Digital Commons Network^™

Justifying Redistributive Regulations, Jack Lienke

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Conventional cost-benefit analysis asks whether a regulation’s total benefits exceed its total costs but not whether those benefits and costs are distributed fairly across society. The traditional justification for this indifference to equity is that distributional concerns are most efficiently addressed through the tax-and-transfer system. Agencies issuing regulations, the story goes, should focus on growing the pie (i.e., increasing aggregate welfare). If the regulation that yields the largest pie also yields inequitably apportioned slices, Congress can correct the problem with taxes and transfers.

But Congress often asks agencies to fill in the details of its transfer programs with regulations, such …

Toward An Absolute Privilege From Defamation For Statements Made In Campus Sexual Misconduct Proceedings, Elizabeth Munoz-Smith

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Title IX prohibits recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of sex in their education programs and activities. The regulations implementing Title IX impose strict requirements on the procedures that institutions must follow in investigating and adjudicating complaints of sexual harassment. But survivors using campus processes are facing potential liability for defamation at an increasing rate. The existence of this threat leads to further underreporting of an already-underreported crime, a detrimental impact on survivors’ education, and psychological stress created by the re-traumatization of a civil suit that carries potential monetary liability for their report. This Note argues that …

Once More: Digital Services Taxes Should Be Creditable, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In a previous column, I argued that digital services taxes should be creditable as in-lieu-of taxes under section 903. A new analysis by Jane Gravelle sheds further light on this topic but does not change the outcome.

Gravelle makes three arguments against the creditability of DSTs. First, she argues that the whole concept underlying both pillar 1 and DSTs (allocating value to market jurisdictions) is wrong, and therefore they cannot be justified. Second, she argues that DSTs are passed on in full to consumers and that this precludes creditability. Finally, she argues that DSTs are discriminatory excise taxes on U.S. …

Shadow Banking And Securities Law, Gabriel Rauterberg, Jeffery Y. Zhang

Law & Economics Working Papers

Shadow banking may be the single greatest challenge facing financial regulation. Financial institutions that function like banks, but outside the scope of banking regulation—aptly termed “shadow banking”—were at the heart of the Global Financial Crisis and most episodes of serious financial stress since then. Scholars have largely focused on one response to this problem—extending traditional banking regulation to shadow banks. Yet more than fifteen years after the crisis, major regulatory efforts along this route have stalled.

In this Article, we explore the uneasy case for greater regulation of shadow banking through securities law. Our first contribution is analytical. We demonstrate …

Paying For Performance? Attorneys’ Fees In Securities Fraud Class Actions, Stephen J. Choi, Jessica M. Erickson, A. C. Pritchard

Law & Economics Working Papers

This Article studies whether plaintiffs' lawyers matter in securities class actions. We use inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) to compare the results in cases led by top-tier firms against those brought by lower-tier firms. This technique addresses case selection effects by using all of the cases led by a top-tier firm and then weighting the cases led by lower-tier firms based on how similar these cases are to the cases led by top-tier firms. We do find that top-tier lawyers obtain better outcomes for shareholders in a subset of securities class actions, specifically the cases against the larger (although not …

The Usefulness Of Pillar 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Many commentators have declared that pillar 1 of the base erosion and profit-shifting project 2.0 is dead. By its explicit terms, the multilateral tax convention (MLC) implementing pillar 1 cannot go into effect this year without ratification by the United States, and the chances of the United States ratifying it before or after the election are low given massive opposition in Congress. If the MLC does not go into effect by December 31, 2024, over 30 countries will likely impose digital services taxes on January 1, 2025, making the whole pillar 1 project (which was aimed at preventing the spread …

Limitation On Benefits Or Principal Purpose Test? Part 2, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Part 1 of this column discussed the choice between the limitation on benefits and principal purpose test (PPT) and the history of the LOB in U.S. tax treaty policy.

How effective is the LOB article in U.S. tax treaties, now that it no longer includes the PPT from the original U.S. LOB?

Limitation On Benefits Or Principal Purpose Test? Part 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

An interesting recent column by Tax Notes’ Lee Sheppard criticizes the principal purpose test (PPT) that was adopted as a minimum standard in the OECD’s base erosion and profit-shifting project 1.0 and has since been incorporated into many tax treaties through the multilateral instrument. Sheppard explains:

Readers will recall that BEPS 1.0 had a set of minimum standards for participating countries, one of which was a treaty amendment to cement the purpose of the treaty to prevent both double taxation and double nontaxation. Participants could choose between a seemingly simple, subjective principal purpose test (PPT) and a complicated but objective …

Bizindan Miinawa (Listen Again), Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Articles

Johnson v. McIntosh was as fake as John Wayne’s teeth. That one was a property dispute, remember? Two wealthy, privileged, and powerful white people squared off over thousands of acres of land acquired from Indigenous nations who called the vast valley of Eagle River home. On one side, you had a former United States Supreme Court Justice; on the other, you had a wealthy political benefactor/beneficiary. No tribal nations or Indigenous peoples to be seen or heard from. And of course, the competing property claims at issue barely overlapped, if at all, thanks to stipulations of the parties at the …

Has Cost Sharing Outlived Its Usefulness?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In her thoughtful column on cost sharing, Mindy Herzfeld explains the history of costsharing arrangements (CSAs) going all the way back to 1966, and then asks several questions, including: “Should the existing CSA regs be scrapped in favor of another regime, or simply eliminated as a choice for taxpayers?”

Pillar 2 And Specific Benefits For Multinationals, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In a recent column, Tax Notes’ Martin Sullivan asked whether a country that wishes to neutralize the effect of pillar 2 on its investment incentives can get around the OECD prohibition on a multinational enterprise receiving what amounts to a refund of the pillar 2 tax it pays to that country. He writes that:

It would make a mockery of the pillar 2 taxation system if an investment hub imposed a 15 percent minimum tax on a company — thereby shielding profit in that hub from other jurisdictions’ pillar 2 tax — and then, through a separate mechanism, unconditionally returned …

Preventing Inversions, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Inversions (transactions in which a U.S. parent corporation becomes a subsidiary of a foreign corporation, but the headquarters remain in the United States) were a major focus of tax policy before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.1 There have been no inversions since the TCJA, but that is more a result of the current rate structure. If the corporate tax rate is increased, inversions may come back, and the time to act to prevent that is now.

Should Large Corporate Mergers Be Subsidized?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

On March 21 Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, DR. I., and J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, introduced the Stop Subsidizing Giant Mergers Act. They explained that large mergers have been increasing in recent years and that since 2007, up to 40 percent by value of all mergers have been structured as tax free. They argue that the tax breaks to mergers are a “wasteful subsidy.”

Garland V. Vanderstok: Brief Of Major Cities Chiefs Association; Police Executive Research Forum; And Current And Former National Security Officials, Law Enforcement Officers, And Prosecutors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Barbara Mcquade

Appellate Briefs

Amici are the Major Cities Chiefs Association, the Police Executive Research Forum, and numerous current and former national security officials, law enforcement officers, and prosecutors.

The Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) is a professional organization of police executives representing the largest cities in the United States and Canada. The mission of MCCA is to provide a forum for police executives from large population centers to address the challenges and issues of policing, to influence national and international policy that affects police services, to enhance the development of current and future police leaders, and to encourage and sponsor research that advances …

Narrowing Foia's Exemption For Business Secrets, Deepa Varadarajan

Michigan Law Review Online

This essay examines the judicial aftermath of Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, a controversial 2019 Supreme Court decision that broadened the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption for trade secrets and confidential commercial information (“Exemption 4”). This decision has made it easier for firms to hide damaging information from public view, frustrating the efforts of journalists and government watchdog groups that make FOIA requests to expose environmental harms, health risks, and failures of agency oversight. But two recent circuit court decisions highlight a promising path forward; they interpret Exemption 4 in ways that can mitigate Food Marketing’s negative …

Contractual Remedies In Mergers: Lessons From Crispo V. Musk, Dhruv Aggarwal, Albert H. Choi, Geeyoung Min

Law & Economics Working Papers

The Delaware Chancery Court recently restricted a merger target's ability to recover damages on behalf of its shareholders from a breaching buyer. This paper investigates the impact of the decision. First, we present a theoretical analysis to generate empirical predictions. Second, we show that the decision led to a decrease in the firm value of targets in mergers governed by Delaware law. Third, we hand-collect relevant provisions from merger agreements and find that the agreements governed by Delaware law increasingly include target-friendly non-price terms after the decision. We also present evidence suggesting deal price responds to the inclusion of novel …

Are Exit Taxes Discriminatory?, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In a recent column, Tax Notes’ Robert Goulder analyzed case law in Europe on the constitutionality of exit taxes. Many EU member states impose exit taxes on individual residents who move to lower-tax jurisdictions, but the Court of Justice of the European Union has repeatedly struck them down as inconsistent with freedom of movement unless they allow for deferral until realization or death with no interest charge, which is equivalent to having no exit tax at all. Goulder cogently argues that this issue is similar to the Moore problem in the United States, especially since the U.S. exit tax on …

The Administrative Procedure Act Problem Reconsidered, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

Tax Notes contributing editor Ryan Finley’s excellent article on the 3M case1 and the Administrative Procedure Act provides an opportunity to reconsider the damage done to tax law by taxpayers constantly invoking the APA to invalidate regulations or IRS notices.

Liability For Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Medicine, Nicholson W. Price Ii, Sara Gerke, I. Glenn Cohen

Book Chapters

While artificial intelligence (AI) has substantial potential to improve medical practice, errors will certainly occur, sometimes resulting in injury. Who will be liable? Questions of liability for AI-related injury raise not only immediate concerns for potentially liable parties but also broader systemic questions about how AI will be developed and adopted. The landscape of liability is complex, involving healthcare providers and institutions and the developers of AI systems. In this chapter, we consider these three principal loci of liability. At the outset, we note a few issues that shape our analysis.

Now You Have It, Now You Don’T: Taxing Crypto, Part 2, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

In “Coinbase: Are Cryptoassets Securities?” Tax Notes contributing editor Lee A. Sheppard highlights a recent district court decision indicating that some forms of cryptoassets are securities for securities law purposes and therefore fall under the jurisdiction of the SEC:

There are potential tax ramifications. Some, indeed many, cryptoassets could be securities under the securities law. That means that losses can’t be recognized on wash sales (section 1091). The IRS should issue a notice stating that many cryptoassets other than bitcoin are securities, so losses on wash sales can’t be recognized. A notice would not be a heavy lift. The taxpayers …

The Broader Lessons Of Privacy Law, Salome Viljoen

Articles

This Article explores the trend of privacy—and what kind of techno-social or legal effect ought to count as a “privacy harm”—expanding to encompass a growing set of social factors. This big-tent approach to privacy has several virtues. However, it also comes with a few costs. While others have explored the conceptual and doctrinal tradeoffs that an expansive approach to privacy may entail, this Article focuses on a secondary effect the trend toward expansiveness has had on the relationship between privacy scholarship and legal scholarship more broadly. This Article suggests that the internal expansiveness of privacy means that insights developed within …

Now You Have It, Now You Don’T: Taxing Crypto, Part 1, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

Articles

The latest rise in the value of bitcoin has rekindled the debate on whether cryptocurrencies perform a useful function. For example, a recent article in the Financial Times argued: Have we learnt the lessons from the disastrous 2022 crash in digital assets? To judge from recent action in the crypto market, the answer appears to be no. Since hitting bottom after FTX collapsed into bankruptcy with a $9bn-ish hole in its balance sheet in November 2022, crypto market values have roughly tripled. Bitcoin’s price rose above $70,000 this week to touch record highs. A new wave of enthusiasm is growing, …

Front Matter

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Front Matter for Volume 57, Issue 4 of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Confronting Algorithms: Conscience Catching In The Criminal Trial And Beyond, Sherman J. Clark

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Using the question of how to treat algorithmic evidence under the Confrontation Clause as an entry point, I argue that the use of AI in ethically salient situations presents a risk. It may cause us to avoid confronting our own responsibility. This matters because facing up to what we do, including what we delegate, can help us grow and thrive. Bearing responsibility can help us nurture vital capacities, including forms of empathy, honesty, and dignity. In the language of ethics, these are eudaimonist virtues—traits and capacities that can help us live well and fully. We should thus find ways of …

The Needless Search For A Founding-Era "Hearsay" Definition, Jeffrey Bellin

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Modern Confrontation Clause doctrine permits only unconfronted “out-of-court statements that would have been admissible in a criminal case at the time of the founding.” To operationalize this concept, the Supreme Court identifies “testimonial hearsay” as the Clause’s primary concern. Its opinions regularly dive into the historical record to refine what counts as “testimonial” but ignore that record in defining “hearsay.” This omission cannot last. Cases in the lower courts, and one on the Court’s recent docket, concern testimonial but (arguably) non-hearsay statements. And while confrontation jurisprudence is supposed to be tied to founding-era evidence law, the “hearsay” definition, casually referenced …

Agency Use Of Indirect Benefits To Justify Regulation, Abe Eichner

Michigan Law Review

Executive agencies have long used indirect benefits—meaning benefits beyond the express purpose of a regulation—to justify their rulemakings. However, the statutes that provide agencies with regulatory authority rarely explicitly direct agencies to consider indirect benefits. Lower courts disagree over whether consideration of indirect benefits is permissible, and the Supreme Court has reserved the question for a future case. Courts and existing scholarship have largely asked whether particular statutory provisions authorize consideration of indirect benefits. This Note contends that, even without such statutory authorization, indirect benefits are presumptively permissible because they further three traditional administrative law values: rational decisionmaking, transparency, and …

Feedback Loops: Upward Appreciation., Patrick Barry

Articles

When was the last time you tried to make your boss feel welcome? Last week? Last month? Never?

How about the last time you tried to make one of your mentors feel welcome? Your mom? Your dad? A particularly helpful pastor, rabbi, imam, or other religious leader?

Front Matter, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Front Matter for Volume 122, Issue 8 of Michigan Law Review

Bounded Extraterritoriality, Ruth Mason, Michael S. Knoll

Michigan Law Review

Twenty-first-century politics has inspired a new mode of interstate rivalries and reprisals consisting not of the tariffs that plagued the Founding but rather of regulations with significant impacts outside the enacting state’s borders. Employing the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine of extraterritoriality, the Supreme Court has limited overbroad state regulations, but the extraterritoriality doctrine is unclear both in its normative grounding and practical application. This Article proposes a conceptual framework that situates the prohibition of extraterritoriality as an aspect of horizontal federalism. Our conceptualization of extraterritoriality enables us to distinguish it from two dormant Commerce Clause doctrines with which it is …

Subjective Beliefs About Contract Enforceability, J. J. Prescott, Evan Starr

Articles

This article assesses the content, role, and adaptability of subjective beliefs about contract enforceability in the context of postemployment covenants not to compete (noncompetes). We demonstrate that employees tend to believe that even clearly unenforceable noncompetes are enforceable, including their own. We provide evidence for both supply- and demand-side stories that explain employees’ persistently inaccurate beliefs. Moreover, we show that believing that unenforceable noncompetes are enforceable likely causes employees to forgo better job opportunities and to perceive that their employer is more likely to sue them if they choose to compete. Finally, we use an information experiment to inform employees …