Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (9762)
- International Law (1184)
- Intellectual Property Law (769)
- Constitutional Law (472)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (415)
-
- Criminal Law (338)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (233)
- Business Organizations Law (219)
- Environmental Law (215)
- Law and Society (204)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (189)
- Banking and Finance Law (185)
- Administrative Law (154)
- Courts (148)
- Law and Politics (139)
- Judges (131)
- Property Law and Real Estate (126)
- Legislation (124)
- First Amendment (122)
- State and Local Government Law (121)
- Supreme Court of the United States (108)
- Legal History (104)
- Civil Law (97)
- Election Law (96)
- Criminal Procedure (95)
- Civil Procedure (94)
- Jurisprudence (93)
- Legal Profession (93)
- Torts (93)
- Law and Gender (91)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (247)
- Constitution (242)
- Copyright (131)
- First Amendment (125)
- Constitutional law (109)
-
- Criminal law (107)
- Antitrust (105)
- Privacy (98)
- Bankruptcy (96)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (94)
- Evidence (92)
- Property (90)
- First amendment (89)
- Law (88)
- Regulation (88)
- Presidential Succession (84)
- Tax (84)
- Religion (83)
- Securities (83)
- Constitutional Law (80)
- Twenty-Fifth Amendment (80)
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (78)
- 25th Amendment (78)
- United States Politics (78)
- Women Politicians (78)
- New York (76)
- International Law (74)
- Race (74)
- Professional responsibility (73)
- Discrimination (72)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (4293)
- All Decisions (1756)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1627)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1452)
- Faculty Scholarship (1102)
-
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (691)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (374)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (316)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (305)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (277)
- The Advocate (100)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (92)
- Fordham Law Review Online (87)
- Speeches (66)
- Correspondence (56)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (44)
- Congressional Materials (36)
- Fordham Lawyer (33)
- Art. 78 Petitions (28)
- Faculty Bibliography (23)
- Reports (23)
- Art. 78 Responses (20)
- Res Gestae (19)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (18)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (17)
- Amicus Briefs (15)
- Maloney Matters (15)
- SJD Dissertations (15)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (14)
- Executive Branch Materials (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1351 - 1380 of 13109
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Corporate Esg Falls Short: Systemic Anti-Black Racism And Inequality Should Be Addressed Through A Cumulative Integrated Approach, Ferrell L. Littlejohn
Corporate Esg Falls Short: Systemic Anti-Black Racism And Inequality Should Be Addressed Through A Cumulative Integrated Approach, Ferrell L. Littlejohn
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
In the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court endorsed the “separate but equal” doctrine, essentially codifying racial segregation. This decision guaranteed that systemic racism would permeate every fabric of society despite the abolition of slavery. Recently, many corporate institutions have pledged to actively support the fight against systemic racism through their environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) initiatives. Corporate stakeholders have actively advocated for these initiatives, particularly in response to recent scholarship revealing the significant involvement of capitalist institutions in historical slavery, and the continued perpetuation of anti-Black racism. Nevertheless, such initiatives, for example, internal diversity, equity, and …
The Notes You Don’T Play: An Empirical Analysis Of The Ninth Circuit’S Filtration Problem In Music Copyright Cases, Robert D. Capodilupo
The Notes You Don’T Play: An Empirical Analysis Of The Ninth Circuit’S Filtration Problem In Music Copyright Cases, Robert D. Capodilupo
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
The Ninth Circuit’s approach to music copyright cases has failed to provide artists with a clear landscape of the boundaries of copyright protection for creative works. Perhaps most disconcerting is the doctrine’s lack of rigid guidance as to which elements of a composition are protected by copyright. Since the court’s controversial ruling in Williams v. Gaye, which showcased the court’s failure to differentiate between protectable and unprotectable musical elements, the literature has taken a greater interest in analyzing the effects of this muddied doctrine. In their 2019 article, Christopher Jon Sprigman and Samantha Fink Hedrick theorize how the doctrine of …
Misappropriation Of Drawing Power (Free-Riding) In Trademarks, Tony Bortolin
Misappropriation Of Drawing Power (Free-Riding) In Trademarks, Tony Bortolin
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
This Article advances the cause of action regarding the Misappropriation of Drawing Power (“free-riding”). It is a form of anti-dilution, along the lines of European Union laws regarding parasitism, and is analogous to other laws such as the protection of personality rights. It could also help settle long-standing debates in the trademark field, such as those regarding dilution by blurring, initial-interest confusion, comparative advertising, and whether and how to protect marks beyond the geographical scope of the plaintiff’s sales (such as protecting U.S. marks used internationally).
Business Empire To Patent Umpire: Amazon And The Ascent Of Platform Patent Adjudication, Shih-Wei Chao
Business Empire To Patent Umpire: Amazon And The Ascent Of Platform Patent Adjudication, Shih-Wei Chao
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
A trend in patent law is mounting, one which this Article refers to as Platform Patent Adjudication. Amazon’s Patent Evaluation Express (“APEX”) now allows patent owners and sellers to resolve infringement disputes without using courts, and even without traditional alternative dispute resolution mechanisms like arbitration or mediation, but instead entirely within the platform setting. Amazon touts, and many practitioners agree, that its procedure is much less expensive and much quicker than litigating in court. But why is Amazon doing this? And why have other platforms not done this before? This Article takes a step back to examine the conditions and …
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702: The Good, The Bad, And A Proposal To Make It Less Ugly, Kevin Burns
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702: The Good, The Bad, And A Proposal To Make It Less Ugly, Kevin Burns
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) has been controversial since its inception. Created to allow intelligence collection against targeted foreign persons, electronic surveillance under Section 702 casts a wide net, often capturing communications sent to or by United States persons. Opponents point to the invasion of privacy such collection presents, and to the well-documented abuse and biased use of Section 702 data against U.S. citizens. This Note argues that despite this, Section 702 is a vital tool in the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking and the case against Section 702 is weaker than it appears. This …
Good Readers, Good Writers, And Ai: Tool, Collaborator, Author?, Katherine Jung
Good Readers, Good Writers, And Ai: Tool, Collaborator, Author?, Katherine Jung
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) systems have revolutionized the world of creative writing. Beyond providing simple grammar or spelling assistance, the most advanced of these systems can now play a collaborative role in the writing process, increasing productivity while pushing content in new and surprising directions. AI-generated creativity raises compelling questions in the context of copyright law, which has long been predicated on the assumption of human authorship. The capacity of AI to one day generate writing at a level of mastery on par with human beings complicates traditional notions of creativity, the protection of which the entire copy …
Algorithmic Dead Hands: What Is Dead May Never Die, Zachary L. Catanzaro
Algorithmic Dead Hands: What Is Dead May Never Die, Zachary L. Catanzaro
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Can we transcend death? By harnessing large language models and the invasive data harvesting of surveillance capitalism, AI systems now offer testators unprecedented posthumous control over property and heirs. These algorithmic ‘dead hands’ promise a seductive form of digital immortality, but if left unchecked, they threaten to spawn a novel breed of perpetuities. This technology risks birthing a digitized techno-feudal Necrocracy marked by inalienable property, extreme wealth consolidation, and the dead’s perpetual dominion over the living.
While modern reforms have weakened the common law’s traditional hostility to dead hand control, these reforms failed to anticipate technologically embodied intentionality persisting beyond …
A Trade-Off In Smart Contract Arbitration; Sacrificing Arbitrators’ Anonymity For Transparency?, Bahadir Köksal
A Trade-Off In Smart Contract Arbitration; Sacrificing Arbitrators’ Anonymity For Transparency?, Bahadir Köksal
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
The recent growth in blockchain usage has substantially affected the number of transactions executed via smart contracts. In parallel, the number of transactions will likely increase the number of disputes that arise from these smart transactions. Some innovative arbitration platforms have emerged in response to the urgent need for a tailor-made dispute resolution mechanism. These platforms tend to promote the anonymity of arbitrators because of their decentralized nature and secured proceedings. Does the anonymity of arbitrators’ identities and skills increase the transparency in smart contract arbitration? And to what extent can the anonymity of arbitrators be sacrificed for more transparent …
Agreeing To Disagree: The Problems Of The Traditional Approaches To The Interpretation Of International Law, Nahuel Maisley
Agreeing To Disagree: The Problems Of The Traditional Approaches To The Interpretation Of International Law, Nahuel Maisley
Fordham International Law Journal
People disagree about international law. To help them work through these disagreements, the discipline has developed a series of rules on the interpretation of its various sources—most notably, Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the standards developed by the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission for the identification of custom. The problem, however, is that these norms are themselves subject to disagreement, thereby creating a meta-debate about how to interpret the rules on interpretation. This Article delves into this meta-debate, focusing specifically on the views adopted by the “traditional …
Access To Civil Justice For Parents In The U.S. Child Welfare System, Caitlin Rubin
Access To Civil Justice For Parents In The U.S. Child Welfare System, Caitlin Rubin
Fordham Urban Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Correcting Federal Rule Of Evidence 404 To Clarify The Inadmissibility Of Character Evidence, Hillel J. Bavli
Correcting Federal Rule Of Evidence 404 To Clarify The Inadmissibility Of Character Evidence, Hillel J. Bavli
Fordham Law Review
Courts misinterpret Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(2) as an exception to Rule 404(b)(1)’s prohibition on character evidence rather than a mere clarification that emphasizes the permissibility of other-acts evidence whose relevance does not rely on propensity reasoning. This misinterpretation turns the rule against character evidence on its head by effectively replacing Rule 404 with a Rule 403 balancing—and one that incorrectly treats character inferences as probative rather than prejudicial, thereby favoring admissibility rather than exclusion. Consequently, as currently interpreted, Rule 404(b)(2) generates substantial unpredictability and verdicts based on conduct not at issue in a case.
I therefore propose that the …
Eliminating Rule 609 To Provide A Fair Opportunity To Defend Against Criminal Charges: A Proposal To The Advisory Committee On The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Jeffrey Bellin
Fordham Law Review
Federal Rule of Evidence 609 authorizes the admission of prior convictions to impeach criminal defendants who testify. And in this important and uniquely damaging application, the [r]ule’s logic fails, distorting American trials and depriving defendants of a fair opportunity to defend against the charges. The Advisory Committee [on Evidence Rules (the “Advisory Committee”)] should propose the elimination of Rule 609 and prohibit cross-examination with specific instances of a criminal defendant’s past conduct when those instances are unrelated to the defendant’s testimony and unconnected to the case.
This short essay begins by setting out the proposed rule change alongside a proposed …
Modern Disaster Fragmentation, Abigail E. André
Modern Disaster Fragmentation, Abigail E. André
Fordham Law Review
Natural disasters test us. They exist at the intersection of nature, law, and society to show us where our systems are failing. Beyond physical damage, they magnify weaknesses in our socioeconomic and legal systems. In an attempt to leverage the lessons disasters bring, this Article analyzes the administrative institutions that govern disaster relief from the perspective of law, history, equity, and institutional design. This intersectional analysis uncovers a system fragmented by centuries of disorganization and infused with socioeconomic discrimination. Minor revisions cannot fix our federal approach to disaster relief: an institutional overhaul is required to achieve good governance.
State Drug Laws, Mason Marks
State Drug Laws, Mason Marks
Fordham Law Review
States have long enacted drug laws that depart from federal laws and regulations. In the early twentieth century, several states prohibited marijuana while it remained federally unregulated. In the 1960s, states started criminalizing psychedelic substances. Shortly thereafter, in the early 1970s, they started reversing the trend to criminalize drugs by reducing or eliminating criminal penalties associated with personal marijuana use. State-level decriminalization accelerated in the 1990s and 2000s.
More recently, states have extended drug policy reforms to other substances, including psychedelics, stimulants, and opioids. Some states have eliminated criminal penalties while others have replaced criminal penalties with fines or diversion …
Marijuana And The Tyrannies Of Scheduling, Robert A. Mikos
Marijuana And The Tyrannies Of Scheduling, Robert A. Mikos
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expecting Medication Surveillance, Jennifer D. Oliva
Expecting Medication Surveillance, Jennifer D. Oliva
Fordham Law Review
In response to federal financial incentives and mandates, all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and three U.S. territories administer electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). Federal and state policymakers justified the implementation and enhancement of ubiquitous prescription drug monitoring by contending that expansive state drug surveillance was a necessary weapon in the war against the American drug overdose crisis. As is often the case with tools designed for law enforcement surveillance, however, PDMPs have proven susceptible to mission creep. Although pioneer PDMPs were paper-based systems that limited their surveillance to a narrow class of heavily regulated controlled substances, modern …
Tele-Induction Of Buprenorphine For Opioid Use Disorder: Regulatory Flux And Public Confusion, Stacey A. Tovino
Tele-Induction Of Buprenorphine For Opioid Use Disorder: Regulatory Flux And Public Confusion, Stacey A. Tovino
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Liberty On Hold: The Constitutional Test And Source For Overdetention Claims, Sarya Baladi
Liberty On Hold: The Constitutional Test And Source For Overdetention Claims, Sarya Baladi
Fordham Law Review
The persistence of overdetention—meaning continued detention after officers knew or should have known that the arrested person was entitled to release—poses major concerns about both the fundamental right against arbitrary detention and other unenumerated constitutional rights. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Baker v. McCollan established a vague constitutional protection against overdetention, but it left lower courts to answer many open questions about its parameters.
Although courts agree that the Constitution prohibits law enforcement from arbitrarily detaining indefinitely an arrested person who protests their legitimate release, the application of this protection has been inconsistent across federal courts of appeals. …
Turning A Blind Eye To “Prisoner-On-Prisoner” Brawls: Why Failure-To-Protect Claims Should Proceed Under Bivens, Sophia M. Brusco
Turning A Blind Eye To “Prisoner-On-Prisoner” Brawls: Why Failure-To-Protect Claims Should Proceed Under Bivens, Sophia M. Brusco
Fordham Law Review
Correctional officers have an obligation, under the Eighth Amendment and 18 U.S.C. § 4042, to protect incarcerated persons from an attack at the hands of fellow incarcerated individuals. Despite this duty, when a federal officer fails to protect an incarcerated person from attack, the viability of the victim’s claim against the offending officer is uncertain. Even though the doctrine, created in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, allows courts to infer a cause of action for damages directly from the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a test in Ziglar v. Abbasi that has …
Racial Targets, Atinuke O. Adediran
Racial Targets, Atinuke O. Adediran
Faculty Scholarship
It is common scholarly and popular wisdom that racial quotas are illegal. However, the reality is that since 2020’s racial reckoning, many of the largest companies have been touting specific, albeit voluntary, goals to hire or promote people of color, which this Article refers to as “racial targets.” The Article addresses this phenomenon and shows that companies can defend racial targets as distinct from racial quotas, which involve a rigid number or proportion of opportunities reserved exclusively for minority groups. The political implications of the legal defensibility of racial targets are significant in this moment in American history, where race …
Executive Power, The Royal Prerogative, And The Founders’ Presidency, Andrew Kent
Executive Power, The Royal Prerogative, And The Founders’ Presidency, Andrew Kent
Faculty Scholarship
The original meaning of the opening clause of Article II of the Constitution— which vests “[t]he executive power ... in a President of the United States”—has been debated inconclusively for over 200 years. As originalism gains ground as an interpretive theory in U.S. courts, and the U.S. executive branch continues to read the clause very expansively, often by making claims about original meaning, an intense scholarly debate has raged in recent decades about the Clause. A cohort of influential originalist scholars read the Executive Power Clause as a broad grant of war, foreign affairs, and national security power supposedly considered …
Defamation, Presumed Damages, And Reputational Injury: A Legal And Philosophical Inquiry, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Defamation, Presumed Damages, And Reputational Injury: A Legal And Philosophical Inquiry, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Tort For The Digital Age: False Light Invasion Of Privacy Reconsidered, John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
A Tort For The Digital Age: False Light Invasion Of Privacy Reconsidered, John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
In his famous 1960 article, William Prosser identified four privacy torts: Disclosure of Private Facts, False Light Invasion of Privacy, Appropriation of Likeness, and Intrusion Upon Seclusion. Although each was recognized in the Second Torts Restatement and by various courts, the false light tort seems to have foundered. Indeed, starting in the late 1980s, prominent courts rejected it and many academics have expressed grave misgivings about it. Often interpreted as a kind of ‘defamation lite,’ the tort seems to its critics an ill-defined wrong that clever lawyers invoke to evade important limitations on defamation liability.
Drawing from case law and …
Blue Carbon Law, Adam D. Orford
Blue Carbon Law, Adam D. Orford
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the emerging law of blue carbon, defined as rules governing human interventions into Earth’s marine carbon cycles. Blue carbon law is of growing importance today as pressure mounts to incorporate coastal conservation and restoration activities into market-based carbon sequestration schemes, and as the planet’s deep oceans are evaluated for their carbon sequestration potential. The Article conceptualizes two broad trends in blue carbon law: the international law of carbon credit markets creating incentives to commodify and monetize blue carbon resources; and the responsive integration of commodification concepts into existing laws that already manage and influence blue carbon systems, …
Voice, Prevention, Remedy: Key Elements In A Global Supply Chain Convention, James J. Brudney
Voice, Prevention, Remedy: Key Elements In A Global Supply Chain Convention, James J. Brudney
Faculty Scholarship
In a global supply chain (GSC) setting, workers’ voice may be understood as the extent to which employees and others toiling in the supply chain are able to participate—individually and/or collectively—in decisions affecting their labor conditions and rights. Policy instruments may strengthen this voice insofar as they provide mechanisms enabling workers to identify and actualize their labor rights within the GSC. This Article initially situates the role of workers’ voice in GSCs by reference to the writings of political economist Albert O. Hirschman. In his classic book, Exit Voice, and Loyalty, and related articles, Hirschman focused on mechanisms for addressing …
The Original Meaning Of The Sixteenth Amendment, John R. Brooks, David Gamage
The Original Meaning Of The Sixteenth Amendment, John R. Brooks, David Gamage
Faculty Scholarship
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived.” Challenges to the exercise of that power have typically turned on whether the thing being taxed is “income” or not. In the most recent example, the 2023 Supreme Court case of Moore v. United States, taxpayers have argued that the Sixteenth Amendment only authorizes taxation of realized income—this is, that gain from appreciated property can only be taxed as “income” when there has been a sale or conversion of that property.
In this Article we argue—based on the …
The Global Tax Deal And The New International Economic Governance, Rebecca Kysar
The Global Tax Deal And The New International Economic Governance, Rebecca Kysar
Faculty Scholarship
The ethos of economic integration and trade liberation no longer reigns supreme. Instead of multilateral trade agreements, nations are turning towards protectionism and unilateralism. Yet in late 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to a new global tax deal that is aimed at coordinating their tax systems to curtail tax competition and corporation profit shifting to tax havens, as well as constructing a new allocation of taxing rights among nations. Although multilateral trade agreements now seem out of reach, tax multilateralism is ascendant. This is surprising given the deep tradition of national control over tax policy. It also perplexing since international …
Interpretive Divergence In The New York Court Of Appeals, Ethan J. Leib
Interpretive Divergence In The New York Court Of Appeals, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Scholarship
This Article focuses attention on the New York Court of Appeals, which is decidedly formalist about contract interpretation but decidedly contextualist about statutory interpretation. It explores some recent exemplary cases to show where the New York Court of Appeals tends to land in what turns out to be, for this court at least, two different battlefields in the law of interpretation. Finding that there is “interpretive divergence” between statutory and contract cases, the Article then reflects on the practice of divergence more generally, revisiting assumptions about why anyone might have thought harmonization was sensible in the first place.
Afrofuturism And The Law: A Manifesto, I. Bennett Capers
Afrofuturism And The Law: A Manifesto, I. Bennett Capers
Faculty Scholarship
Afrofuturism seems to be everywhere these days. In music, film, dance, literature. And in this special symposium issue of the Georgetown Law Journal, “Afrofuturism and the Law.” This prompts a foundational question. What is “Afrofuturism and the Law”? More specifically, as a practice, as a discipline, and a legal movement, what should Afrofuturism and the Law be. Indeed, given Afrofuturism’s seeming staying power, and its incursion into law, is it time for a manifesto to set parameters? Hence, this proposed manifesto. To be sure, I am troubled by the word manifesto, especially given its connection to the word manifest, which …
The Legacy Of The Troubles: Casting A Long Shadow Over Northern Ireland, Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley
The Legacy Of The Troubles: Casting A Long Shadow Over Northern Ireland, Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley
Faculty Scholarship
The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement (Agreement) brought hope to Northern Ireland after thirty years of violent conflict during a period known as the Troubles (1968 - 1998). The Agreement offered a framework for ending the conflict and for addressing the needs of victims. However, unlike peace agreements from many other post-conflict societies, it did not provide a transitional justice process for dealing with contentious issues of the past. As a result, more than 25 years after the signing of the Agreement, the problematic legacy of the conflict continues. Paramilitaries are still a cause for concern. Peace walls still exist. Competing sectarian …