Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1106)
- International Law (117)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Legal Profession (71)
- Law and Society (61)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (36)
- Criminal Law (31)
- Business Organizations Law (30)
- Civil Law (25)
- Legal Education (25)
- Other Law (25)
- Law and Gender (22)
- Civil Procedure (21)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Sexuality and the Law (18)
- Law and Race (17)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (16)
- Intellectual Property Law (16)
- Immigration Law (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Social Welfare Law (15)
- Legal History (14)
- Banking and Finance Law (13)
- Judges (13)
- Courts (12)
- Family Law (11)
- Accounting Law (10)
- Administrative Law (10)
- First Amendment (9)
- Education Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (124)
- Professional responsibility (67)
- Low-income (36)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (34)
- Legal ethics (29)
-
- Legal Services Corporation (28)
- Justice (26)
- Legal profession (26)
- Legal aid (25)
- Professionalism (22)
- Children (21)
- Lawyers (20)
- Clients (18)
- UPL (18)
- Monopoly (17)
- Professional monopoly (17)
- Unauthorized practice (17)
- Race (16)
- Pro bono (15)
- Welfare (15)
- Clinics (14)
- Equality (14)
- Poverty (14)
- Regulation (14)
- Access (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Litigation (13)
- Religion (13)
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (12)
- Access to justice (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (503)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (258)
- All Decisions (255)
- Fordham International Law Journal (144)
- Faculty Scholarship (116)
-
- The Advocate (36)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (21)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (17)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (15)
- Fordham Law Review Online (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Speeches (12)
- Stein Center News (12)
- Art. 78 Petitions (11)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (11)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (9)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (7)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (7)
- Reentry Resources (6)
- Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies (5)
- Art. 78 Responses (5)
- Annual Reports (4)
- Lectures (4)
- Amicus Briefs (3)
- Maloney Matters (3)
- Papers of the Dean (3)
- Reports (3)
- Staff Publications (3)
- All Categories (2)
- Black Law Student Association (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 1523
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Torres V. Sedgwick Ave. Dignity Dev. Llc
Nath V. Wei Xiong
All Decisions
Tenant field an Order to Show Cause for an illegal lock-out. By the conference, Tenant was back in posession. Tenant moved to discontinue and LL cross-moved to dismiss for failure to state a cause; for a judgement of possession and order of eviction; to amend the caption; and to issue a money judgement for use/occupancy. Court discontinued Tenant's petition and denied LL's motions. While RPAPL §743 does allow for a party to assert a legal counterclaim in an Answer, it does not allow such party to obtain a judgment of possession without a verified petition as requried by RPAPL §741. …
Administrative Appeal Decision - Voii, Sergio (2020-01-16)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Voii, Sergio (2020-01-16)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Widening The Lens, Sharpening The Focus: Mental Health And The Legal Profession, Bernice Donald, Alex Bransford
Widening The Lens, Sharpening The Focus: Mental Health And The Legal Profession, Bernice Donald, Alex Bransford
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regency Gardens Company V. Yoshevayev
Friedman Residence Llc V. Denson
Greater Allen Affordable Hsc V. Reddick
Celebrating A Lasting Legacy: Thomas Schoenherr, Michael W. Martin
Celebrating A Lasting Legacy: Thomas Schoenherr, Michael W. Martin
Fordham Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Celebrating A Lasting Legacy: Marcella Silverman, Elizabeth Maresca
Celebrating A Lasting Legacy: Marcella Silverman, Elizabeth Maresca
Fordham Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
The Racial Reckoning Of Public Interest Law, Atinuke O. Adediran, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
The Racial Reckoning Of Public Interest Law, Atinuke O. Adediran, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
People’S Electric: Engaged Legal Education At Rutgers-Newark Law School In The 1960s And 1970s, George W. Conk
People’S Electric: Engaged Legal Education At Rutgers-Newark Law School In The 1960s And 1970s, George W. Conk
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On Bankruptcy’S Promethean Gap: Building Enslaving Capacity Into The Antebellum Administrative State, Rafael I. Pardo
On Bankruptcy’S Promethean Gap: Building Enslaving Capacity Into The Antebellum Administrative State, Rafael I. Pardo
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Who Makes Esg? Understanding Stakeholders In The Esg Debate, Matthew Diller, Stephanie Betts, Lorenzo Corte, David M. Silk, Scott V. Simpson, Lisa M. Fairfax, Carmen X. W. Lu, David H. Webber, Leo E. Strine, Jr., Sean J. Griffith
Who Makes Esg? Understanding Stakeholders In The Esg Debate, Matthew Diller, Stephanie Betts, Lorenzo Corte, David M. Silk, Scott V. Simpson, Lisa M. Fairfax, Carmen X. W. Lu, David H. Webber, Leo E. Strine, Jr., Sean J. Griffith
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.
[email protected], Bruce A. Green, Carole Silver
[email protected], Bruce A. Green, Carole Silver
Faculty Scholarship
The transformative potential of technology in legal practice is well recognized. But wholly apart from how law firms actually use technology is the question of what law firms say about how they use and relate to technology—in particular, how law firms communicate whether technology matters and has value in what they do. In the past, firms in the BigLaw category, especially at the top echelon, have grounded their reputations on the credentials and achievements of their lawyers. In this paper, we explore whether elite law firms use technology similarly by describing it as an additional tool of inter-firm competition—a sort …
Experiential Leadership: Teaching Collaboration Through A Shared Leadership Model, Paul Radvany
Experiential Leadership: Teaching Collaboration Through A Shared Leadership Model, Paul Radvany
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Solomon, Matthew (2019-02-14)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Solomon, Matthew (2019-02-14)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Lackwood, Mark (2018-07-06)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Lackwood, Mark (2018-07-06)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Proactive Regulation Of Prosectors' Offices: Strengthening Disciplinary Committees' Oversight Of Prosecutors' Offices Across The United States With Aba Model Rule 5.1, Caitlyn B. Holuta
Proactive Regulation Of Prosectors' Offices: Strengthening Disciplinary Committees' Oversight Of Prosecutors' Offices Across The United States With Aba Model Rule 5.1, Caitlyn B. Holuta
Fordham Law Review
In the United States, there are currently several mechanisms to deter prosecutorial misconduct, including judicial orders, civil litigation by defendants, enforcement actions by disciplinary authorities, and internal discipline within a prosecutor’s office. Despite these many avenues of oversight, none have successfully prevented misconduct to the degree society demands. Several international legal systems have adopted regulatory frameworks based on the theory of proactive management-based regulation, which mitigates against unethical conduct by requiring attorneys to selfassess their internal ethics policies against a rubric of ethics goals set by ethics and disciplinary authorities. While most U.S. jurisdictions have not adopted proactive management-based regulations, …
Administrative Appeal Decision - Davis. Rowland (2020-06-08)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Davis. Rowland (2020-06-08)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Johnston, Frank (2020-06-01)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Johnston, Frank (2020-06-01)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.