Digital Commons Network^™

Lost In The Department Of Education Layoffs: Who’S Accountable Post-Covid-19 For Students With Disabilities?, Sally Terry Green

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reimagining Employment Discrimination Under Title Vii: National Origin And Immigration Status After Bostock, Pierina Hernandez Luperdi

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Right Relationship: Practicing And Teaching Trauma-Responsive Restorative Advocacy, Amy Dallas

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Common Law, Civil Law, And Supranational Law: Clashes Of Interpretation, Andrea Pin

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Defense Of Pro Se Parents, Matthew F. Gillam

Fordham Law Review

Who gets to represent children in federal court? Adults have long been permitted to represent themselves in federal court under the plain meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1654. And, many adults do just that every year. But what if the real party in interest is a minor child? Who, if anyone, can exercise that child’s right to proceed pro se?

This Note argues that the correct reading of 28 U.S.C. § 1654 would permit parents to litigate pro se in federal court where the real party in interest is their minor child. This is based on a straightforward, grammatically correct …

The Re-Criminalization Of Sexual Minorities As A Testing Ground For International Human Rights Law In Africa, Matteo M. Winkler & Ilias Bantekas

Fordham International Law Journal

This Article scrutinizes the recently enacted statutes that re- criminalize sexual minorities in Africa from the standpoint of international human rights law (IHRL). These statutes are currently justified under cultural relativism, that is, the idea that African culture abhors homosexuality, which represents a malicious import from the Western world. We argue that the re-criminalization statutes violate IHRL in multiple stances and that in no way are these violations justifiable under cultural relativism. This does not mean that there is no virtue in cultural relativism, but a limit must be fixed to the dehumanization of minorities which is the intended purpose …

Collateral Damage And Individual Rights In Armed Conflict, Charles P. Trumbull Iv

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reciprocation And Redistribution: The Emergence Of The Trade-Development Fault Line In The Contemporary Wto, Tana Johnson

Fordham International Law Journal

This Article argues that: 1) trade and development reflect different mindsets and policy implications; 2) both are deeply embedded in the legal past of the World Trade Organization (WTO); and 3) tensions between them jeopardize the WTO’s policymaking future. At the argument’s core is the contrast between “reciprocation” and “redistribution.” Trade is associated with reciprocation (bargaining and two-way concessions), while development is associated with redistribution (assistance and one- way concessions). The WTO’s predecessor—the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)—initially insisted on reciprocation but relaxed that insistence over time, eventually merging with redistribution-related elements of the defunct Havana Charter to …

Diversities Requiem: Fashion’S Very Own Brand Of Exceptionalism And Rethinking Mcdonnell Douglas, Symrin Greenhow

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Shadow Defendants, Mariam A. Hinds

Faculty Scholarship

Although the overrepresentation of men, specifically Black men and men of color, in the criminal legal system is well documented, the people who support these men, especially women, have garnered less attention. Women who are proximate to system-involved men—mothers, grandmothers, sisters, daughters, girlfriends, and wives—are invisible actors in the criminal legal system who perform critical tasks and provide essential support. They appear in court to demonstrate a person’s family and community ties, use their assets as collateral for bail, deposit money in commissary accounts, maintain social ties during imprisonment through letters and visits, and bear the burden of filling the …

Combatting The Financial Dismantling Of Public Higher Education, Priya Baskaran

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

How The 2025 Invocation Of Alien Enemies Act Erodes Immigrants’ Rights, Deborah Lee

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Insuring The Uninsurable: The Case For Nontraditional Data, Catherine Ingram

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

You Get The Jury You Get And You Don’T Throw A Fit, Taurus Myhand

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Balancing The Scales: The Case For County-Determined Noneconomic Damages Caps In Medical Malpractice Claims, Matthew Lista

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Don’T Black Lives Matter? Confronting The Problem Of Disproportionate Black Victimization, Paul H Robinson, Jeffrey Seaman

Fordham Urban Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Beyond Jarkesy: Rethinking The Role Of Administrative Law Judges In Sec Administrative Proceedings, Mark T. Uyeda, Jaime Marinaro

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Pitching For Reform: Cangrejeros' Push To Level The Legal Playing Field By Challenging Baseball's Antitrust Exemption, Justin P. Chaljub

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

For over one-hundred years, professional baseball has enjoyed an antitrust exemption unique among American major sports leagues, stemming from Supreme Court decisions in Federal Baseball and its progeny. This exemption has significantly influenced the evolution and structure of Major League Baseball (MLB). Despite extensive criticism and challenges for judicial and legislative reform, the exemption persists today.

However, new efforts have emerged to comprehensively disrupt this framework. In 2023, Nostalgic Partners was brought and structured to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Plaintiffs anticipated they would lose at the lower court levels and garnered widespread support for the Court to grant a …

The Federal Reserve’S Fight Against Covid-19: A Study Of The Corporate Bond Intervention, Noah Seilgson

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve (Fed) embarked on an unprecedented mission to stabilize the U.S. economy as businesses shut down. One emergency Fed facility, the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF), was used to purchase corporate bonds and corporate bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the secondary market. This extraordinary measure, which injected liquidity into the corporate bond market, aimed to mitigate economic fallout for large companies. Purchasing corporate bonds marked a departure from previous Federal Reserve interventions, but the statutory authority was the same as had been used in past crises: Section 13(3) of the Federal …

Company Districts, C.J. Suglia

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Special districts that are owned or controlled by private entities and act almost uniformly like a company town can be dubbed a “company district.” These special districts, similar to historical company towns, have autonomy over the districts, control the local government, and only have to answer to the state government. Historical company towns like Pullman, Illinois and Hershey, Pennsylvania had almost canonical command over the land within their boundaries. Company districts operate their business similar to a company town—in a city that the private entity controls, but do not have employees living on-site. Company districts benefit by being immune to …

Alternatives To Delaware? Evaluating Corporate Law In Nevada, Texas, And Wyoming, Joseph Landau, Bailey Swartz, Anthony Rickey, Robert Ragazzo, Benjamin Edwards, George A. Mocsary

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

In Re Firstenergy Corp. Securities Litigation: Where Macquarie Meets Affiliated Ute, Elizabeth Cosenza, Amanda M. Payne

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

The central question this Article seeks to address is whether there is any world in which the Affiliated Ute presumption can still apply to cases under Rule 10b-5(b) after the Supreme Court’s decision in Macquarie? Put differently, if only half-truths and affirmative misrepresentations remain actionable under Rule 10b-5(b), is the Basic presumption the only pathway left for securities plaintiffs? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit will likely be the first court to address this issue in In re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation. The case will test the availability of the Affiliated Ute presumption post-Macquarie in cases based …

How To Evaluate Non-Majority Control: What History And Statutes Tell Us, J. Travis Laster

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Under American law, a person who controls a corporation is a fiduciary. Since the nineteenth century, American law has treated a person who wields a majority of the voting power as having control. For almost as long, American law has recognized that holding a majority of the voting power is sufficient but not necessary for control. During the past two decades in Delaware, two schools of thought co-existed regarding non-majority control. One school took a formal approach that (i) shifted from examining control over the business affairs of the enterprise to control over the board, (ii) discounted sources of influence …

The Political Commitment Of The Supreme Court Of Texas To Protecting Controlling Equity Owners, Val Ricks

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

The Supreme Court of Texas has revealed a political commitment to protecting controlling equity owners—e.g., shareholders, LLC members, limited partners—from liability related to their equity ownership. The Court does not say this, of course. The commitment the Court intends to reveal is a legal one. The political commitment must be teased out of what the Court does. The purpose of this article is to tease. Its method is to examine how the Supreme Court of Texas, in cases involving controlling or significant equity owners, extends the reasoning of its opinions out beyond law, and sometimes in conflict with it. When …

Reviving Shareholder Voice By Redefining Pre-Suit Demand, Wendy Gerwick Couture

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

This Article diagnoses, and seeks to cure, an undertheorized dynamic relationship between two levers of shareholder influence in the modern public corporation: suit and voice. This Article demonstrates that, under current Delaware law, a shareholder must stifle its voice in order to retain the ability to pursue a viable derivative claim, thus inhibiting the shareholder’s monitoring and information-sharing roles. In particular, the onerous “demand made” litigation pathway disincentivizes pre-suit demand, and the expansive definition of pre-suit demand captures shareholder communications to the board seeking corrective action other than litigation. To avoid this collision between suit and voice, this Article proposes …

The Intended And Resulting Interpretations Of Article 9 Considering The Rise Of Textualism, Cat Gassiot

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

This Article is the first to examine the interpretive choices of judges for Article 9 of the UCC. Textualism has become one of the predominant methods of interpretation for courts across the state and federal systems in the United States. While there is a great deal of academic work on what this means for traditional statutes, there is limited discussion of the interpretive effects of textualism on the UCC, much less Article 9, which governs secured transactions. The continuity and uniformity of secured transactions jurisprudence is fundamental as it underlies bankruptcy proceedings, debt and credit financing, and commercial transactions more …

Scienter Potentia Est: The Case For The Presumption Of Use Standard In Insider Trading, Audrey Nelson

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Is it possible to accidentally insider trade? The Supreme Court has held that scienter is a necessary element of all § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 actions, but the federal appeals courts are split on how the scienter requirement applies to insider trading cases. In a non-insider- trading § 10(b) case, the Supreme Court stated that § 10(b) scienter requires intentional misconduct. Although the Supreme Court has not heard a case specifically about the scienter element in the context of insider trading, those who support a use requirement claim that the § 10(b) scienter element requires the plaintiff to show that …

The Fortunate Demise Of Sec Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14l, Raffaele Felicetti

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

In 2021, the SEC published its now rescinded Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14L (“the 2021 Bulletin”), revising its interpretations of the “ordinary business” and “economic relevance” exclusions under Rule 14a-8. This Article contends that the post-Bulletin landscape has proven undesirable. It empirically shows that environmental and social (“E & S”) shareholder proposals—including anti-E&S proposals—surged in response. Between 2022 and 2024 alone, E & S proposals accounted for 40% of all such filings in Russell 3000 companies over the entire 2014-2024 period, generating an estimated $23.3 million in additional processing costs for companies during that three-year window. Despite their volume, these …

Consumer Protection And The Illusory Promise Of The Unconscionability Defense, Benjamin C. Zipursky, Zahra Takhshid

Faculty Scholarship

The United States Supreme Court’s notorious decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion seems to display impatience with the idea of an unconscionability defense to the enforcement of a contract. At the core of Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion, however, was not an argument against the idea of unconscionability per se, but an argument against using “unconscionability” as a cover for a broader public policy agenda. This interpretation is confirmed by the Court’s little-known decision in Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown, handed down the term after Concepcion was decided. Plaintiffs were allowed to move forward in Marmet because …

The Violence Of Bright Lines, Terrell Woolfolk, Kathryn E. Miller

Fordham Law Review

The U.S. Supreme Court interprets the Eighth Amendment to prohibit members of certain groups from serving extreme punishments, such as the death penalty and life without parole. For example, the Court has long banned death sentences for people with intellectual disability and for those who were under eighteen years old at the time of their crime. More recently, in Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama, the Court extended this reasoning to sentences of life without parole for those under eighteen—prohibiting the sentence altogether for nonhomicide crimes and barring its mandatory imposition for homicides.

Many scholars and advocates have …