Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5367)
- International Law (488)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (229)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (182)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Courts (93)
- Law and Society (91)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (76)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Law and Politics (60)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (58)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Legal History (55)
- Civil Procedure (53)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Labor and Employment Law (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2421)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (784)
- Faculty Scholarship (649)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (605)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 8567
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Concepts Of Citizenship In The Controversy About Constitutional Citizenship For People Born In U.S. Territories, Janet M. Calvo
Concepts Of Citizenship In The Controversy About Constitutional Citizenship For People Born In U.S. Territories, Janet M. Calvo
Fordham Law Review
In 2019, the District of Utah in Fitisemanu v. United States rejected the Insular Cases and held that persons born in American Samoa acquired Fourteenth Amendment constitutional citizenship at birth. The Tenth Circuit reversed through an analysis that attempted to “repurpose” the Insular Cases. This Essay discusses the differing concepts of citizenship presented in Fitisemanu, which raise significant questions about the nature and import of American constitutional citizenship. The Supreme Court’s recent denial of certiorari in Fitisemanu unfortunately leaves these questions unresolved, further continuing the second-class status of individuals born in the territories and underscores the uncertainty of …
The Case Against The Debt Tax, Vijay Raghavan
The Case Against The Debt Tax, Vijay Raghavan
Fordham Law Review
Americans are increasingly agitating for debt relief. In the last decade, there have been national campaigns to cancel student debt, credit card debt, and mortgage debt. These national campaigns have paralleled local efforts to cancel taxi medallion debt, carceral debt, and lunch debt. But as the public increasingly pursues broad-scale debt relief outside bankruptcy, they face an important institutional obstacle: canceled debt is generally taxable.
The taxability of canceled debt is often raised by opponents as an objection to broad debt cancellation and potentially discounts the value of any debt relief. The conventional account for why we tax canceled debt …
The Move Toward An Indigenous Virgin Islands Jurisprudence: Banks In Its Second Decade, Kristen David Adams
The Move Toward An Indigenous Virgin Islands Jurisprudence: Banks In Its Second Decade, Kristen David Adams
Fordham Law Review
In 2011, the Supreme Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands decided Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp. and, with that decision, introduced a new era in Virgin Islands jurisprudence that embraced a much more active role for Virgin Islands courts and a correspondingly diminished role for the American Law Institute’s restatements. This Essay examines what I will call “second-generation” decisions referencing Banks with the goal of determining whether Banks and its progeny have met, or are at least in the process of meeting, “the goal of establishing ‘an indigenous Virgin Islands jurisprudence’” set by the Banks court. Ultimately, this …
Dual Sovereignty In The U.S. Territories, Emmanuel Hiram Arnaud
Dual Sovereignty In The U.S. Territories, Emmanuel Hiram Arnaud
Fordham Law Review
This Essay examines the emergence and application of the "ultimate source" test and sheds light on the dual sovereign doctrine’s patently colonial framework, particularly highlighting the paternalistic relationship it has produced between federal and territorial prosecutorial authorities.
Looks Matter On Social Media: How Should Courts Determine Whether A Public Official Operates Their Social Media Account Under Color Of State Law?, John B. Tsimis
Fordham Law Review
The widespread use of social media has presented a novel legal landscape for the application of constitutionally protected rights—particularly the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. The First Amendment prohibits the government from excluding citizens from a public forum on the basis of their viewpoints. Public officials acting under color of state law similarly may not use the authority of their offices to deprive citizens of their First Amendment rights.
However, the application of this protection in the context of social media has been inconsistent across federal circuit courts. Although these courts agree that viewpoint discrimination by the government on …
254 Park Avenue South Llc V. Sgori
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000134 (2021-10-05)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000134 (2021-10-05)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000134 (2021-08-24)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000134 (2021-08-24)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Bannon, Patrick (2022-11-08)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Bannon, Patrick (2022-11-08)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Sinclair, James (2022-11-08)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Sinclair, James (2022-11-08)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000134 (2022-02-23)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000134 (2022-02-23)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
A Government Of Laws And Not Of Men: Why Justice Brandeis Was Right To Assume Congress Can Restrain The President's Removal Power, Danielle Rosenblum
A Government Of Laws And Not Of Men: Why Justice Brandeis Was Right To Assume Congress Can Restrain The President's Removal Power, Danielle Rosenblum
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Since the Founding, the extent of the president’s power to remove executive officials from office remains unsettled. While the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2 empowers Congress to participate in the hiring of executive officials, the United States Constitution’s text is silent on whether Congress can limit the president’s ability to fire such employees. The debate on the proper scope of the president’s removal power is significant because it serves as a proxy for a larger constitutional question: whether constraints on presidential power advance or sit in tension with democracy. This Article argues that Justice Brandeis was right to …
A Modern-Day 3/5 Compromise: The Case For Finding Prison Gerrymandering Unconstitutional Under The Thirteenth Amendment, Shana Iden
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Vestiges of slavery and systemic disenfranchisement of people of color persist in the United States. One of these remnants is the practice of prison gerrymandering, which occurs when government officials count incarcerated individuals as part of the population of the prison’s location rather than the individual’s home district. This Article argues that prison gerrymandering functions as a badge of slavery that should be prohibited under the Thirteenth Amendment.
First, this Article provides background on prison gerrymandering and charts its impact through history, particularly on Black communities. Moreover, this Article analyzes how litigation under the Fourteenth Amendment has not yielded meaningful …
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
Rucho In The States: Districting Cases And The Nature Of State Judicial Power, Chad M. Oldfather
Rucho In The States: Districting Cases And The Nature Of State Judicial Power, Chad M. Oldfather
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
2275 Morris Realty Llc V. Garcia
Clinton Arms Assoc. V. De Gonzalez
Decock V. State Of N.Y. Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
Decock V. State Of N.Y. Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Wise V. 1614 Madison Partners, Llc
Parole Board Report - Fusl000143 (2020-11-17)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000143 (2020-11-17)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000152 (2021-07-=27)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000152 (2021-07-=27)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000152 (2021-08-10)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000152 (2021-08-10)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000152 (2021-03-09)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000152 (2021-03-09)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000148 (2018-04-20)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000148 (2018-04-20)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000148 (2018-12-24)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000148 (2018-12-24)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000143 (2022-01-15)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000143 (2022-01-15)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000148 (2021-07-20)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000148 (2021-07-20)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000152 (2022-05-05)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000152 (2022-05-05)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
435 Central Park West Tenant Association V. Park Front Apartments, Llc
435 Central Park West Tenant Association V. Park Front Apartments, Llc
All Decisions
No abstract provided.