Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (27100)
- Education Law (183)
- Constitutional Law (177)
- Religion Law (171)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (145)
-
- Courts (126)
- Family Law (95)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (93)
- First Amendment (90)
- Arts and Humanities (82)
- Legal Education (73)
- Criminal Law (70)
- Legal Profession (65)
- Religion (65)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (64)
- Business Organizations Law (61)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (59)
- Education (52)
- Criminal Procedure (51)
- Sexuality and the Law (51)
- Human Rights Law (48)
- Labor and Employment Law (48)
- Intellectual Property Law (44)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (39)
- Tax Law (38)
- Litigation (37)
- International Law (36)
- Civil Procedure (35)
- Law and Politics (34)
- Taxation-Federal (34)
- Keyword
-
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180983-CA; court brief (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20181046-CA; court brief (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190541-CA; court brief (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190242 (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190863 (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200311 (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200435 (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230768 (4)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (4)
- Utah Supreme Court; 20190560-SC; court brief (4)
- Utah Supreme Court; 20190764-SC; court brief (4)
- Utah Supreme Court; 20220786-SC; court brief (4)
- Corporate law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Inc. (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Intellectual property (3)
- Interpretation (3)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180225; court brief (3)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180257; court brief (3)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180575; court brief (3)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190316; court brief (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6195)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (5933)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (4529)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (3502)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (3179)
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (2620)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (2569)
- BYU Law Review (821)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (368)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (278)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (209)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (169)
- Faculty Scholarship (120)
- The Clark Memorandum (42)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (35)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (15)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (13)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (12)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (8)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (8)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (7)
- Publication Type
Articles 30301 - 30330 of 30632
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Arguments Before The Committee On Patents, May 3, 1906, United States Congress
Arguments Before The Committee On Patents, May 3, 1906, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee, during the last hundred years and more the inventors of the country have been liberally dealt with by the lawmakers, and the result is to-day no country m the world stands higher in everything in the line of mechanical and industrial development than the United States does, and I think you gentlemen who have this matter of patents in charge may justly take pride in yourselves that your committee in the past has done such magnificent work for the wealth, the prosperity, and the reputation, and the ability of the United States at …
Arguments Before The Committee On Patents, May 2, 1906, United States Congress
Arguments Before The Committee On Patents, May 2, 1906, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
CHAIRMAN. The bill seeks to amend section 4966 of the Revised Statutes, which in the original text is as follows:
Any person publicly performing or representing any dramatic composition for which a copyright has been obtained, without the consent of the proprietor thereof, or his heirs or assigns, shall be liable for damages therefor, such damages in all cases to be assessed at such sum, not less than one hundred dollars· for the first and fifty dollars for every subsequent performance, as to the court shall appear to be just.
On January 6, 1897, section 4966 was amended to read …
Anna M. Larkin, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Saltair Beach Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
W. A. Worthen And William Drury, Respondents, V. Perivian Consolidated Mining Company, A Corporation, Appellant : Respondents' Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Anna M. Larkin, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Saltair Beach Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Appellant's Reply Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Agnes Evans, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Glens Falls Insurance Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Anna M. Larkin, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Saltair Beach Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Brief For Appellant
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Excerpt From Report Of The Librarian Of Congress For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1905, United States Congress
Excerpt From Report Of The Librarian Of Congress For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1905, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
"The existing copyright laws of the United States are admittedly imperfect and confused, difficult for the courts to interpret, and impossible for the Copyright Office to administer to the satisfaction of its clients. A similar, though less flagrant condition of the laws relating to trade-marks led to the appointment by Congress of a Commission to revise and codify them. Similar action has been urged to deal with copyright. The experience of the committees of Congress concerned with these subjects led them to believe, however, that as effective results would be achieved more promptly, and at less cost, by conference and …
Stenographic Report Of The Proceedings Of The Librarian's Conference On Copyright, 1st Session, In New York City, May 31-June 2, 1905, United States Congress
Stenographic Report Of The Proceedings Of The Librarian's Conference On Copyright, 1st Session, In New York City, May 31-June 2, 1905, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
The origin and the occasion and the purpose of the Conference … is a general agreement that our present copyright laws are defective in definition and imperfect and perhaps inconsistent in expression. The occasion is an intimation from the Senate Committee on Patents that at the coming session of Congress it proposes to submit abill for a codification of these laws. Such a bill would naturally be drafted in the Copyright Office. If so, it would be the desire of the Copyright Office to have upon it the criticism of the various interests concerned with copyright protection. But the office …
Letter From Sen. Kittredge To Librarian Of Congress, Dated January 27, 1905, Recommending That Librarian Call Conference, United States Congress
Letter From Sen. Kittredge To Librarian Of Congress, Dated January 27, 1905, Recommending That Librarian Call Conference, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
UNITED STATES SENATE
Committee on Patents
Washington, D. C.
January 27, 1905.
Hon. Herbert Putnam,
Library of Congress
Washington, D. C.
My dear Sir:-
Yesterday I conferred with Senator Platt of Connecticut regarding your suggestion that Congress by resolution authorize you to call a conference to consider a codification of the copyright law. Senator Platt is strongly opposed to the appointment of a commission and also thinks it improper for Congress to authorize you to call this conference. I have taken this matter up with the members of the Patent Committee and we have agreed that Senator Platt’s conclusion is …
Paul Wood, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. The Rio Grande Western Railway Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Brief Of Respondent
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Paul Wood, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. The Rio Grande Western Railway Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Appellant's Reply Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
P.T. Elwell, Plaintiff And Respondent, Against George Morrow, Annie Morrow, His Wifem Carrie Cain, Addison Cain, Trustee, Harry Lawrence, And Respondents, Thomas Marnane, Intervener And Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Hon. W. C. Hall, Judge
E. J. Wilkinson, Trustee, Plaintiff, V. Anderson Taylor Company, A Co-Partnership Composed Of Joseph Anderson, Stanley Taylor And S. F. Taylor, Defendants : Appellant's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, A Corporation, Plaintiff And Appellant, V. Moylan C. Fox, Trustee, And F. M. Hayden, Defendants And Respondents : Abstract Of Record
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah, Hon. S. W. Stewart, Presiding
M.B. Sowles And D.C. Roberts, Surviving Executors Of The Estate Of Bolivar Roberts, Deceased, Respondents, V. Spencer Clawson, Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Byron R. Moyes, A Minor, By Stewart H. Moyes, His Guardian Ad Litem, Respondent, V. Ogden Sewer Pipe & Clay Company, A Corporation, Appellant : Appellant's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
E.J. Wilkinson, Trustee, Plaintiff, V. Anderson-Taylor Company, A Corpartnership, Composed Of Joseph Anderson, S. F. Taylor And Stanley Taylor, Defendants : Appellants' Abstract
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
M.B. Sowles And D.C. Roberts, Surviving Executors Of The Estate Of Bolivar Roberts, Deceased, Respondents, V. Spencer Clawson, Appellant : Appellant's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
State Of Utah, Ex Rel, Salt Lake City, V. Benj. R. Eldredge, Assessor Salt Lake County, And Salt Lake County : Brief Of Defendants
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
John Evans, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Highland Boy Gold Mining Company, And Robert T. White, Defendants And Appellants : Brief Of Respondent
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Richard S. Brooks And Birkett B. Brooks, Co-Partners As R.S.Brooks & Son, Plaintiffs And Respondents, V. Western Union Telegraph Company, A Corporation, Defendant And Appellant : Abstract Of Record
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Charles E. Pence, Respondent, V. California Mining Company, A Corporation, Appellant : Appellant's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from the District Court, Summit County, Hon C. W. Morse, Judge
M. C. Moon, Appellant, V. Salt Lake County, A Municipal Corporation; And The Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, A Corporation, Respondents : Appellant's Reply Brief On Appeal From Judgment In Favor Of O. S. L. R. R. Co.
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Charles E. Pence, Respondent, V. California Mining Company, A Corporation, Appellant : Appellant's Abstract
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from the District Court, Summit County, Hon C. W. Morse, Judge
The Bullion Beck And Champion Mining Company, Plaintiff And Respodent, V. The Eureka Hill Mining Company, Defendant And Appellant : Brief Of Appellant
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
Kate Johnson, Respondent, V. Park City, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Kate Johnson, Respondent, V. Park City, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from the District Court, Summitt County, Hon. C. W. Morse, Judge
William Gladmann, Plaintiff And Respondent, V. Lizzie Condon, Defendant And Appellant : Appellant's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
Appeal from the Second District Court in and for Weber County
Sol Block And Griff, A Co-Partnership, Composed Of Sol Block And Theo W. Griff, Plaintiffs And Respondents, V. Samuel L. Schwartz, John Mann, Intervenor And Appellant : Respondent's Brief
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.
M. C. Moon, Appellant, V. Salt Lake County, A Municipal Corporation; And The Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, A Corporation, Respondents : Appellant's Brief On Appeal From Judgment In Favor Of The Oregon Short Line Railroad Company
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)
No abstract provided.