Digital Commons Network^™

Banning Congressional Stock Trading: Will Congress Vote For A Bill That Prevents Them From Profiting Off Industries They Regulate To Help Restore The Country’S Faith In The Political Process?, Priyanka Patel

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

"Significant Bodily Intrusions": Investigations Into Law Enforcement Phlebotomy, Anne Kathleen Johnson

Dissertations and Theses

This three-paper dissertation explores law enforcement phlebotomy, the ability of law enforcement officers to draw blood. Phlebotomy is both a ubiquitous, invasive diagnostic tool as well as a social site with complex relational dynamics at play between phlebotomist and patient. Through law enforcement phlebotomy, the blood draw is co-opted from the medical field into the policing field, and the normative framework through which it is used changes: whereas medical edicts instruct providers to work with patients through an ethics of care--respecting consent and refusal--policing is not similarly bound, instead operating through a prioritization of security and efficiency. In the articles …

When A Government’S Control Crosses Borders: How The Overinclusive Nature Of Trig Continues To Exclude Qualified Noncitizens From Obtaining Legal Status In The United States, Mailinda Hoxha

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

All The Regulatory Light We Cannot See: The Impact Of Loper Bright On Regulating Artificial Intelligence In The Workplace, Bradford J. Kelley

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Professor Britta Redwood Accepted To 2025 Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum, Britta Redwood

Cardozo Law News Archive

Assistant Professor of Law Britta Redwood has been accepted to present at the 2025 Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum, taking place June 2–3 at Harvard Law School. Her paper, “A Brutal Anomaly: Unfettered Ownership Rights and the Illegality of Transatlantic Chattel Slavery,” was selected through a competitive double-blind review process. The work argues that transatlantic chattel slavery was unlawful at the time it was practiced, challenging Eurocentric interpretations of treaty and customary international law and instead grounding its analysis in general principles of international law. This recognition places Professor Redwood among a select group of 12–20 junior scholars chosen to …

The Quest For Algorithmic Justice In The Workplace: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission And Other Federal Responses To Ai, Technology, And Enhanced Dangers Of Employment Discrimination, David Lopez

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

A Voting Obstacle Course: Improving And Codifying New Hampshire Absentee Voting, Jessica Mcgloin

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Artificial Intelligence For Lawyers And Law Students: Crutch, Craft, Or Catalyst?, David S. Kemp

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

From Factory Floors To Courtroom Doors: The New Jersey Law Revision Commission Review Of An Exception And A Defense To The Exclusive Remedy Of The New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act, Whitney G. Schlimbach, Carol Disla-Roa

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Quantitative Ai Risk Assessments: Opportunities And Challenges, David Piorkowski, Michael Hind, John Richards

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Patients Are Entitled To Moore: Determining The Relationship Between Phenotype, Genotype, Spleens, Data, And Informed Consent, Charles E. Binkley

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Ttp As An Effective Response To Sffa, Michael Asante-Appiah

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

002nd Amendment: License To Abuse While Armed? The Intersection Of Intimate Partner Violence And Second Amendment Rights, Laura Burkett

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Brandon M. Hornlein, Mailinda Hoxha, Jessica Wisowaty

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Vol. 49, No. 3

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Doctors Playing Lawyers: Lessons For Professional Regulation In Crisis, Rebecca H. Allensworth

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

When someone gets in legal trouble in America, their case is almost invariably decided by a lawyer (a judge), lay people (a jury), or a combination of the two. Professional discipline, however, is a giant unexplained exception. In professional discipline matters, accusations of dangerous or incompetent practice are decided, usually in the first instance but always in the last, by state licensing boards composed of other members of the accused’s profession. These licensing boards wield immense power as labor regulatory institutions, covering ten times as many American workers as the minimum wage and more workers than private and public sector …

Bridging The Justice Gap: Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic At North Mississippi Rural Legal Services, Emma-Kathryn Bond

Honors Theses

Over the course of two years, I spent more than 130 hours completing on-the- ground volunteer work with the Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC), a clinic within North Mississippi Rural Legal Services that provides free legal assistance to individuals navigating disputes with the IRS. While the Sixth Amendment guarantees legal representation in criminal cases, no such guarantee exists for civil matters such as tax disputes, housing instability, or loss of public benefits. Clinics like LITC fill a crucial gap by offering support in areas that are often overlooked, such as tax law, where clients risk audits, wage garnishments, and court proceedings …

Police Questioning In Hospitals: Custodial Interrogation Or Not?, Jessica Wisowaty

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

In Congress, A Welcome, But Flawed, Step To Stop Trump’S Transfers To Torture, Scott Roehm, Rebecca Ingber

Online Publications

Senate Democrats are demanding the Trump administration provide information on its transfers to torture in El Salvador, including actions it has taken in response to court orders. On May 1, U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Alex Padilla (D-CA), introduced legislation outlining the questions they want answers to. Representative Joaquin Castro (D-TX) is leading companion legislation in the House.

Executive Watch: Zick On Executive Orders And Official Orthodoxies, Timothy Zick

Popular Media

During his first term as president, Donald Trump signaled that he was not committed to pluralism and expressive liberty when it came to matters like patriotism, public protest, and other forms of dissent. During his second term, Trump has issued multiple executive orders that attempt to impose official orthodoxies or understandings regarding race, gender, patriotism, and other subjects.

As we have seen, these edicts are not merely symbolic. The executive orders call for agency actions and criminal investigations, and place hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding at risk. The orders have affected what universities teach, which immigrants can …

Law Of Federal Courts (2d Ed.), James L. Oakes

Maine Law Review

Professor Charles A. Wright's second edition of Law of Federal Courts, one of the West Hornbooks is not exactly light reading. It probably will not make the best-seller list, at least in competition with some of the current, racy fare that list affords. Indeed, it is not even the kind of law book that one picks up and reads from cover to cover, so to speak. At the same time, Law of Federal Courts is a thoroughly realistic, well composed work of legal art which will fill any reviewer's bill. With a broad brush stroke, Professor Wright, who was one …

Uncommon Controversy, David Getches

Maine Law Review

In the mid-nineteenth century the Indians of the Northwest were pressured by government agents into signing treaties ceding most of the land they had historically occupied to the United States. In each treaty, besides reserving small tracts of land for themselves, the Indians specifically reserved the right to fish "at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations." Because the lands which the Indians were permitted to reserve were selected so as "not to interfere with existing [non-Indian] claims, or with the progress of settlements," many traditional fishing places were located outside the reservations. The Indians' grudging acceptance of the treaties …

The Fair Credit Reporting Act, David J. Fletcher

Maine Law Review

With the increasing importance of credit in the United States economy, a specialized group of agencies has developed to supply businesses with personal information on consumers. These reporting agencies come in two basic forms. Credit bureaus deal with purely economic data and use a file system to develop their reports. Investigative consumer reporting agencies issue a more comprehensive report which is generally the result of a field investigation. Because of subjective judgments, errors of identification, or use of untrustworthy sources, consumer reports often are inaccurate. The direct result of most inaccuracy is harm to the report's subject, the consumer. An …

Wallace V. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.: Defective Products, Expanded Liability, And The Demise Of The Impact Rule, Robert A. Whidden

Maine Law Review

During the last decade there has been a rapid change in the theories of recovery in cases involving defective products. A majority of jurisdictions has adopted strict products liability as a tort. Others still employ implied warranty, a device, apparently tort, borrowed from contract law. A minority still holds that a plaintiff must prove his claim in negligence. In a recent decision, Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc., the Maine Supreme Judicial Court addressed the question of the extent of a manufacturer's liability for a defective product and the nature of the proof necessary to show a compensable injury. This …

Beaulieu V. Beaulieu: An Obituary For Lex Loci And An Approach To Interest Analysis, David C. Shonka

Maine Law Review

Clifford Beaulieu, a guest in his father's automobile, was injured when the vehicle struck a telephone pole in Massachusetts. Both parties were residents of Maine. The trip had originated in Maine and was to terminate there. The son filed an action against his father in the Maine Superior Court, alleging negligent operation of the vehicle. On an agreed statement of facts, the case was reported to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court where the defendant argued for dismissal of the action on the grounds that the doctrine of lex loci delictus, the law of the place of the tort, was applicable …

Extending The Smith V. Hooey Duty To The Holding Jurisdiction, Ronald D. Russell

Maine Law Review

The right to a speedy trial has been an integral part of the Anglo-American legal system since its foundation. The first statement of this guarantee seems to be in the codification of basic rights included in the Magna Charta. It was incorporated into the earliest laws of colonial America and later expressed in the sixth amendment to the Constitution. In Klopfer v. North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court stated, "The history of the right to a speedy trial and its reception in this country clearly establish that it is one of the most basic rights preserved by our Constitution." …

Bernier V. State - The Right To Counsel In Entrustment Revocation Proceedings, Peter J. Detroy

Maine Law Review

Theodore Bernier was adjudicated a juvenile offender in September, 1966, and was subsequently committed to the Boys Training Center (BTC) for the term of his minority. In February, 1968, he was released on entrustment to his parents. Almost a year and a half later, Bernier was questioned by local police regarding his possible involvement in the theft of greenstamps from a local store. Although he was released without the police taking further action, they notified an aftercare and placement worker assigned to the BTC of the questioning. As a result, the BTC revoked the entrustment, and the police took him …

Law Of Rebuttable Presumptions In Maine, Curtis L. Bourdon

Maine Law Review

In Hinds v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., the Maine Supreme Judicial Court sought to clarify and simplify the law of rebuttable presumptions as to the quantum of evidence that must be introduced before a presumption is dispelled. The Maine court adopted a rule which states that a presumption is rebutted when the probability of the nonexistence of the presumed fact is as probable as its existence. Stated another way, a presumption is rebutted when the jurors' minds are placed in equilibrium. Ten years later, in State v. O'Clair, the court expressly incorporated the Hinds rule into criminal procedure. …

Constitutional Dilemmas Posed By State Policies Against Marine Pollution - The Maine Example, Daniel Wilkes

Maine Law Review

The physical fact about coastal pollution is that, since many of its harms are irreversible, it must be prevented and not just dealt with as it arises. The legal fact about coastal pollution is that legislation which aims to prevent pollutants must survive attacks under the due process, equal protection, commerce, and privileges and immunities clauses of the federal Constitution if we are not to lose entirely the enjoyment of our coastal waters. As the following discussion of the "Environmental Protection Package" passed by the First Special Session of the 104th Maine Legislature and the earlier Wetlands Act shows, judicial …

Conservation, Policy And The Role Of Counsel, David J. Halperin

Maine Law Review

The conservation interests in the State of Maine have been roused to a furor by the decision of Maine's highest court in State v. Johnson. The case, in substance, holds that Maine's Wetlands Act is unconstitutional when applied to prohibit the filling of a specific segment of salt water marsh. While both the decision and the underlying statute are of considerable substantive interest, the case deserves particular study for the light it sheds on the role of counsel in helping the legal process accommodate new policy concerns. A note of caution must, of course, be sounded before seeking to generalize …