Digital Commons Network^™

Folder 3, Law School Building, 1919, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 4, Law School Building Fund--Student Subscriptions, 1912, Undated, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 5, Law School Bulletins, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 6, Law School Bulletins, Cont., John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 7, Law School Enrollment List, 1918, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 8, Law School Graduates, 1886-1911, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 9, Law School History Notes And Sketch, 1886-1912, 1917, Undated, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

Folder 10, Law School Petitions For Admission To The South Carolina Bar, 1920, John Peyre Thomas Jr.

Thomas, John Peyre Jr. (1910-1920)

No abstract provided.

The Ethics Of Exploitation: How Social Media Profits From Attention, Addiction, And Data Manipulation, Laeila Scott

NSU Undergraduate Law Journal

The pervasive influence of social media platforms extends far beyond digital interaction, shaping human behavior, manipulating democratic processes, and exploiting user data with minimal oversight. Through the attention economy, these platforms employ algorithms designed to maximize engagement at the expense of users’ autonomy, fostering addiction and cognitive dependency. Manipulative terms and conditions further entrench corporate control, binding users to contracts with the very companies that obscure the extent of data collection and limit legal recourse. The Cambridge Analytica scandal laid bare the dangers of unregulated data harvesting, demonstrating how personal information can be weaponized for political and economic gain.

Beyond …

Discussing The Unconstitutionality Of The Dual Sovereign Doctrine, Kaden Collorafi

NSU Undergraduate Law Journal

This paper critically examines the United States Supreme Court’s long-standing endorsement of the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine, which permits successive prosecutions by both state and federal governments for the same underlying conduct. Rooted in dicta from Moore v. Illinois and formally adopted in United States v. Lanza, the doctrine, in the author’s opinion, has repeatedly undermined the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Despite the incorporation of this clause to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment in Benton v. Maryland, the Court has maintained the doctrine on grounds of judicial practicality and sovereign independence.

Through an in-depth review …

Beyond Loper Bright: Securities Enforcement And Regulation In A Post-Chevron World, Kevin Campion, Jake Griggs

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.

Commencement Program - Seton Hall University School Of Law Class Of 2025 Commencement Exercises

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Speech - Benediction - Seton Hall Law School Commencement Njpac May 28, 2025, Kevin P. Mckenzie '25

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Speech - Seton Hall Law School Commencement Welcome Address, Katia Passerini , Provost And Senior Executive Vice President

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Speech - Dean Weich's 2025 Commencement Remarks, Ronald Weich , Dean Of Seton Hall Law School

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Speech - Seton Hall Law Graduation, 2025 - Chair Of The Board Of Visitors, Welcome Remarks, Elaine A. Rocha , Esq., Chair, Board Of Visitors

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Speech - Class Of 2025 Commencement Speech, Najma Hassan

Graduation

No abstract provided.

Bruni And Sugden On Market Virtues, Luís C. Calderón Gómez, Robert Talisse, John A. Weymark

Articles

According to classical liberalism, markets are instruments for the mutually advantageous voluntary exchange of goods and services among individuals who have conflicting interests. Some critics have used a virtue ethics understanding of behavior in markets to call for moral limits to markets because this classical view does not respect the internal value of human practices and the intrinsic motivations of individuals. In response, Luigino Bruni and Robert Sugden have offered a virtue ethics defense of markets, thereby “reclaiming virtue ethics for economics.” We argue that their account needs further elaboration and clarification before it is possible to assess the soundness …

The Lawyer As Advocate, Mark R. Brown, Jonathan Rapping, Christian Stegmaier

Mercer Law Review

Remarks from the Lawyer as Advocate panelists from the Mercer Law Review Annual Symposium, which was entitled Parts of a Whole: The Multiple Roles of the Lawyer and Professional Identity (Oct. 4, 2024). A recording of The Lawyer as Advocate panel may be found online at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iixbw77DW_I [https://perma.cc/NQ4X-MW43]. Each of the panelists’ full biographies may be found online at the following link: https://guides.law.mercer.edu/ld.php?content_id=78269490 [https://per ma.cc/CAY7-MQUX].

Lawyer As Judge Or Other Neutral Actor, Verda M. Colvin, Charles Gardner Geyh, Marc T. Treadwell

Mercer Law Review

Remarks from the Lawyer as Judge or Other Neutral Actor panelists from the Mercer Law Review Annual Symposium, which was entitled Parts of a Whole: The Multiple Roles of the Lawyer and Professional Identity (Oct. 4, 2024). A recording of The Lawyer as Judge or Other Neutral Actor panel may be found online at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iixbw77DW_I [https://perma.cc/NQ4X-MW43]. Each of the panelists’ full biographies may be found online at the following link: https://guides.law.mercer.edu/ld.phpcontent_id=78269490 [https://perma.cc/CAY7-MQUX].

Professional Roles Expanded: Holistic, Systemic, & Optimistic Lawyering, Douglas B. Ammar

Mercer Law Review

Last night’s keynote speaker—Mary Smith—suggested that there is often a connection between working with individuals (i.e., being an advocate) and seeking systemic change.1 Those connections rarely occur at the same time, during the same transactions. They seldom overlap They might not even be sequentially connected in time, but they are connected. One prepares you for the other—direct service lays the groundwork for system change.

For the first twenty years of our organization’s history, we focused solely on individual representation—on being someone’s lawyer as they faced a criminal charge. We did that work, and continue to represent individuals, in an iconoclastic …

The Lawyer’S Obligation As Public Citizen, Gene R. Nichol

Mercer Law Review

It is an honor to participate in this symposium—at the Mercer Law School—which, to its great credit, is looking hard and thoughtfully at the lawyer’s professional role. I particularly admire the focus on the lawyer’s obligation as public citizen. Something we pay attention to, I’d guess, less frequently than other purported ethical charges. I’m grateful, too, that the Mercer Law Review would host this terrific conference. And I salute former American Bar Association (ABA) President Mary Smith’s leadership on these issues; especially her formation, in 2023, of the ABA’s Task Force for American Democracy, with Judge Michael Luttig and others, …

Money For Nothin’, Gifts For Free: The Supreme Court Differentiates Between Bribes And Gratuities In Snyder V. United States, Seth Lewis

Mercer Law Review

The Supreme Court of the United States determined that the federal bribery statute regarding state and local officials did not include gratuities in Snyder v. United States. In Snyder, James Snyder was convicted of accepting an illegal gratuity under 18 U.S.C. § 666 and appealed his conviction. The Court’s decision addressed the split in the United States Courts of Appeals regarding whether 18 U.S.C. § 666 criminalized gratuities, payments made after an official’s act without a prior agreement, along with bribes, payments made with a prior agreement. The Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 666 only criminalized bribes and did …

Good Faith, Bad Faith, And Ugly Tactics: Bad Faith In Modern Insurance Litigation, John M. Forbes

Mercer Law Review

This Article seeks to explain bad faith in insurance litigation. Its purpose is to provide a general overview of the cause of action, as well as outline some of the nuances which make bad faith difficult to litigate for all involved. In this Article, Part III will introduce the general idea of the cause of action and discuss some of its history. Part IV will discuss the mechanics, including: first and third-party claims, procedural prerequisites, the origins of a claim, whether insurers must pay a claim to avoid bad faith, assignment, damages, and summary judgment. Part V will explain why …

The Ambiguity Rule: Pennhurst, Dole, And The American Rescue Plan Act, Damiano Servidio

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Lawyer As Counselor, Joan Macleod Heminway, D'Andrea Morning, Ben Parrish

Mercer Law Review

Remarks from the Lawyer as Counselor panelists from the Mercer Law Review Annual Symposium, which was entitled Parts of a Whole: The Multiple Roles of the Lawyer and Professional Identity (Oct. 4, 2024). A recording of The Lawyer as Counselor panel may be found online at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iixbw77DW_I [https://perma.cc/NQ4X-MW43]. Each of the panelists’ full biographies may be found online at the following link: https://guides.law.mercer.edu/ld.php?content_id=78269490 [https://pe rma.cc/CAY7-MQUX].

Current Events In Legal Classrooms: Enhancing Professional Identity Formation, Stevie Leahy

Mercer Law Review

In the Fall of 2023, educators were surveyed on their inclusion of “current events” in classroom spaces (“CE Survey”). The term current events was broadly defined as: “events that are happening in the world, including recent legal decisions (U.S. or global), political events that impact the operation of the legal system, and/or social events that impact your community. This definition is intended to be inclusive.” Based on nearly 100 responses, the results indicate that while the large majority of educators agreed that incorporating current events into instruction is vital, there are still many barriers to responsible inclusion of this type …

The Aftermath Of Loper Bright: The Demise Of Deference Will Make No Difference In Securities Law, Dan M. Berkovitz

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.

Loper Bright And Judicial Review Of Ratemaking, Alison Gocke, Nathaniel Glass

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pleas And Prejudice: Examining Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargaining After The Supreme Court’S Denial Of Certiorari In Davis V. United States, Casey R. Morrison

Seton Hall Law Review

No abstract provided.