Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6866)
- University of Michigan Law School (1836)
- Fordham Law School (1499)
- Duke Law (1166)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1116)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (1101)
- William & Mary Law School (973)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (901)
- Brigham Young University Law School (864)
- UC Law SF (862)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (844)
- University of Minnesota Law School (814)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (782)
- Seton Hall University (742)
- Southern Methodist University (725)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (709)
- Notre Dame Law School (679)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (660)
- University of Richmond (656)
- University of Chicago Law School (639)
- Cornell University Law School (603)
- New York Law School (570)
- Columbia Law School (562)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (538)
- Florida State University College of Law (537)
- University of Miami Law School (526)
- University of Washington School of Law (513)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (512)
- University of Missouri School of Law (493)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (488)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (1290)
- Criminal justice (1127)
- Law (774)
- Justice (642)
- Criminal procedure (614)
-
- Crime (585)
- Police (573)
- Evidence (550)
- Sentencing (548)
- Capital punishment (468)
- Race (468)
- Death penalty (458)
- Criminal Law (457)
- Constitutional law (403)
- Punishment (403)
- Criminology (390)
- Human rights (390)
- Supreme Court (360)
- Due process (341)
- Corrections (335)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (332)
- Discrimination (327)
- Constitutional Law (323)
- Sixth Amendment (319)
- United States Supreme Court (316)
- Fourth Amendment (309)
- Courts (298)
- Civil rights (294)
- Ethics (293)
- Law enforcement (290)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (6599)
- Faculty Scholarship (2408)
- Articles (1224)
- Faculty Publications (1097)
- Michigan Law Review (675)
-
- Fordham Law Review (597)
- Scholarly Works (481)
- North Carolina Law Review (456)
- Faculty Articles (348)
- Hofstra Law Review (341)
- Indiana Law Journal (340)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (338)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (331)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (330)
- Journal Articles (326)
- UC Law Journal (326)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (325)
- Cardozo Law Review (313)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (312)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (310)
- Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021) (308)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (305)
- Seton Hall Law Review (299)
- SMU Law Review (290)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (288)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (284)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (274)
- Louisiana Law Review (272)
- Notre Dame Law Review (271)
- Missouri Law Review (267)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 991 - 1020 of 53055
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Making Youth Matter, Kimberly Ambrose
Making Youth Matter, Kimberly Ambrose
Washington Law Review
Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the United States. The harm caused by this public health crisis falls disproportionately on Black and Brown youth. While it is broadly accepted that children are less blameworthy than adults for their criminal behavior, what does this mean when they have access to and use guns? The Supreme Court held that youth matters when juveniles face life without parole sentences because children are different from adults—they fail to appreciate risks and consequences; are more impulsive; more susceptible to peer and family influence; less able to remove themselves …
Another Broken Promise: The Mmiwg2s Crisis And The Violation Of The Federal Indian Trust Obligation, Marley Forest
Another Broken Promise: The Mmiwg2s Crisis And The Violation Of The Federal Indian Trust Obligation, Marley Forest
Washington Law Review
Indigenous Women, Girls, and Two-Spirit people go missing and are murdered at rates nearly ten times the national average in the United States. This disproportionate epidemic of violence has been labeled the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls, and Two-Spirit (MMIWG2S) crisis. Several factors exacerbate this crisis. First, European colonizers used violence against Native people, especially women and Two-Spirit people, as a tactic of control and domination since first contact in the 1600s. Second, nearly two hundred years of legislative actions and case law have effectively stripped Native Nations of all criminal jurisdictional power over crimes committed on their land …
Rethinking Courtroom Presence In The Virtual Era, Jenia Iontcheva Turner
Rethinking Courtroom Presence In The Virtual Era, Jenia Iontcheva Turner
Indiana Law Journal
Technological innovation has made virtual appearances by criminal defendants increasingly common. These appearances have advanced efficiency but also raised questions about the scope of both the right and the duty of defendants to be physically present in court. Should judges, for example, be allowed to hold virtual arraignments, even if a defendant wishes to appear in person? Can defendants opt for virtual appearances at will? While courts are beginning to address these questions, they have yet to develop a coherent framework to evaluate when virtual appearances are constitutional and appropriate. This Article seeks to contribute to this project by examining …
Extreme Prison Sentences: Legal And Normative Consequences, Melissa Hamilton
Extreme Prison Sentences: Legal And Normative Consequences, Melissa Hamilton
Cardozo Law Review
The article examines the phenomenon of extreme sentences—defined as those exceeding 200 years—in the federal criminal justice system, raising critical questions about their rationale, proportionality, and alignment with traditional theories of punishment. Through an empirical study of 55 such cases, the analysis highlights the role of mandatory minimums, cognitive biases, and an exclusionist mindset in driving these sentences. It critiques the normalization of extreme penalties and their implications for mass incarceration, deterrence, and human dignity.
Can Ai Empower The Rule Of Law?, Eleftheria Papadaki
Can Ai Empower The Rule Of Law?, Eleftheria Papadaki
North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Future Crime: A Theoretical Foundation For Designing Effective Cybercrime Laws In The Age Of Ai And Ransomware, Thi Ha Do, Niloufer Selvadurai
Future Crime: A Theoretical Foundation For Designing Effective Cybercrime Laws In The Age Of Ai And Ransomware, Thi Ha Do, Niloufer Selvadurai
North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Judicial Enforcement Of Evidence Law, G. Alexander Nunn
Judicial Enforcement Of Evidence Law, G. Alexander Nunn
Faculty Scholarship
The truth matters. At least it should. In the courtroom, truth can serve as the cornerstone of justice, liberating the innocent, vindicating victims, and holding the guilty to account. Indeed, truth is such a normative imperative that an entire legal discipline now focuses on fostering its discovery at trial—evidence law. By regulating both the reliability of proof and the rationality of cognitive inferences, evidence law seeks to help factfinders discern truth and reach an accurate verdict. And given the importance of that role, one might naturally assume that the strict enforcement of evidence law would be a legal mandate of …
Seeing Is Believing: Identifying The “Ideal Manifestation Of Hidden Disability” In Ontario’S And Quebec’S Social Benefits Tribunals, Pascale Malenfant
Seeing Is Believing: Identifying The “Ideal Manifestation Of Hidden Disability” In Ontario’S And Quebec’S Social Benefits Tribunals, Pascale Malenfant
Dalhousie Law Journal
The phenomenon of disability skepticism, especially in relation to “hidden” disabilities like chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), has fostered a culture of doubt among medical, legal, and public entities. This paper explores the intersection of such skepticism with the social benefits adjudication processes in Ontario and Quebec. In drawing parallels to feminist critiques of the “ideal victim” in sexual assault cases, it argues that the tribunals’ biased framework for believability is based on a claimant’s conformity to stereotypical expectations of what an “ideal” claimant with a hidden disability looks like. By comparatively examining 10 years worth of Ontario and Quebec tribunal …
Getting There From Here: Reflecting On Compassionate Migration Policy, Steven W. Bender
Getting There From Here: Reflecting On Compassionate Migration Policy, Steven W. Bender
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
Having written about Latinx issues for more than three decades, with a focus on immigration policy for at least the last two decades, I see no middle ground in this time of Trump. Those who relish hurt and hate, and those scholars who wrote the kindling for that bonfire, must be basking in the glow of their handiwork. Those of us who I claim are on the right side of history must search through the ashes for hope—the where, when, and how to nurture humanity on scorched ground. Counting myself among those searching for hope, I acknowledge the indulgence offered …
Thou Shalt Not Castrate: The Conflict Between Louisiana’S Surgical Castration Law And The Principles Of Medical Ethics, Morgan Ambrosecchia
Thou Shalt Not Castrate: The Conflict Between Louisiana’S Surgical Castration Law And The Principles Of Medical Ethics, Morgan Ambrosecchia
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 2024, Louisiana became the first state to permit courtordered surgical castration for sex offenders who have been convicted of certain sex crimes against children. Under the law, an offender who refuses to submit to the procedure will face an additional three to five years in prison without the possibility of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The court’s order is contingent on confirmation by a court-appointed expert that the offender is an “appropriate candidate for surgery.” However, the statutory language is vague and does not clearly define who can serve as an expert nor does it define the scope …
Look What You Made Me Do, Russell M. Gold
Look What You Made Me Do, Russell M. Gold
Washington and Lee Law Review
We have understood for centuries that crime is both the product of social forces and individual choice. We know now that crime is affected by economic deprivation, addiction, trauma, and mental health issues. But American criminal legal processes hide this reality by coercing defendants into expressing a profoundly simple narrative: crime is solely individual choice to do wrong. This coerced narrative finds defendants during a plea colloquy standing up in court saying that they are pleading guilty because they are guilty and for no other reason. A defendant who goes off-script to tell the judge that they have been repeatedly …
Sovereign Solutions: Reclaiming Reproductive Autonomy In Oklahoma Indian Country After Dobbs, Morgan Sandler
Sovereign Solutions: Reclaiming Reproductive Autonomy In Oklahoma Indian Country After Dobbs, Morgan Sandler
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In the United States, Native American women face disproportionately high rates of sexual violence and adverse maternal health outcomes. In addition to these ongoing challenges, they continue to face significant barriers to reproductive healthcare access. Oklahoma’s near-total abortion ban—without exceptions for rape or incest—exacerbates these negative trends, particularly for Native women and the Two-Spirit community. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, approximately 42 percent of Oklahoma’s land area is recognized as Indian Country. This Comment explores how Oklahoma’s abortion ban disproportionately impacts Native women due to systemic inequities stemming from the federal government’s long history of …
A Call For Canceling Compassionate Release And Restoring Federal Parole, Honorable Chief Judge C.J. Williams
A Call For Canceling Compassionate Release And Restoring Federal Parole, Honorable Chief Judge C.J. Williams
Washington and Lee Law Review
The current federal sentencing scheme is a patchwork quilt of provisions that grant judges virtually unfettered and unreviewable discretion imposing sentences on the front-end and in granting compassionate release on the back end. It was not designed in the beginning to be this way. The advisory-only sentencing guidelines scheme we have now resulted from the Supreme Court’s finding that mandatory guidelines violated the Constitution. The recent sentencing reform movement—of which compassionate release is a significant part—has sought to find ways of ameliorating what is seen as the draconian result of the war on drugs. The question is whether granting Article …
Case Global: A Winning Tradition, Case Western Reserve University School Of Law, The Frederick K. Cox International Law Center
Case Global: A Winning Tradition, Case Western Reserve University School Of Law, The Frederick K. Cox International Law Center
Case Global Newsletter
Volume 17, No. 1 (2025)
- CWRU once again ranked among the best in 2025 PreLaw magazine and US News & World Report rankings of International Law Program...
- Case Western Journal of International Law Tackles the Need to Update the Geneva Conventions
- Building on a Winning Tradition
- CWRU Launches New International Development Law Lab
- CWRU Establishes Spring Break in the Hague Program
- Professor Michael Scharf leads Team to Prepare Ukrainian Judges and Prosecutors to Try Environmental War Crimes
- Professor Rapp teaches Comparative Law to Saudi Administrative Judges in Riyadh
- Yemen Accountability Project publishes two new White Papers
- Immigration Clinic Builds Momentum …
Burdens Of Proof In Criminal Procedure, Eve Brensike Primus
Burdens Of Proof In Criminal Procedure, Eve Brensike Primus
Articles
The Supreme Court’s haphazard approach to allocating burdens of proof in criminal procedure has created a system in which constitutional rights can be rendered meaningless simply because defendants are required to prove things they cannot possibly know. Even though allocations of the burden of proof often drive litigation outcomes, the Court has failed to establish clear burden allocation structures for cases arising under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments, leaving lower courts split about how to allocate the burdens. When the Supreme Court does allocate burdens, it often does so without explanation or consideration of key factors. Recent Supreme …
When Executions Don't Kill: The Stories Of Eight People Who Survived Their Date With Death, Austin Sarat, Julia Morgan-Canales, Aidan Gemme
When Executions Don't Kill: The Stories Of Eight People Who Survived Their Date With Death, Austin Sarat, Julia Morgan-Canales, Aidan Gemme
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
This Article focuses on the eight people who have survived execution attempts in the last 100 years. Some of them faced a second attempt to carry out the sentence. Others escaped that fate only to die in prison; one reached an agreement with the state to allow them to remain in prison for the rest oftheir life, and the fate of another is up in the air.
By examining what went wrong in their executions and the accounts of those events offered by defense lawyers, state officials, and judges, this Article suggests that these executions fall into distinct genres. Each …
Civil Appeals Mediation Program 2024 Mediation Colloquy: 50 Years Of Building Bridges Through Appellate Mediation
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
On December 17, 2024, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and its CAMP program hosted Justice Sotomayor to celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the establishment of CAMP. During the Colloquy, the 50th Anniversary CAMP documentary video was premiered.
Localizing Public Order, Brenner M. Fissell
Localizing Public Order, Brenner M. Fissell
Faculty Publications
Public order offenses—public intoxication, sleeping outside, etc.—seem trivial, but they have enormous consequences for marginalized populations. These are the offenses that justify coercive police interactions, as well as entry into the procedural morass of the criminal legal system. Accordingly, these offenses have received extensive scholarly attention, with decades of research addressing their vagueness and their impact on urban communities of color. But no work has been done to survey how much of this conduct is criminalized and at what jurisdictional level—city or state.
This Article picks up that task, undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the criminal codes of the fifty …
Localizing Public Order, Brenner M. Fissell
Localizing Public Order, Brenner M. Fissell
Vanderbilt Law Review
Public order offenses—public intoxication, sleeping outside, etc.—seem trivial, but they have enormous consequences for marginalized populations. These are the offenses that justify coercive police interactions, as well as entry into the procedural morass of the criminal legal system. Accordingly, these offenses have received extensive scholarly attention, with decades of research addressing their vagueness and their impact on urban communities of color. But no work has been done to survey how much of this conduct is criminalized and at what jurisdictional level—city or state. This Article picks up that task, undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the criminal codes of the fifty …
Judicial Enforcement Of Evidence Law, G. Alexander Nunn
Judicial Enforcement Of Evidence Law, G. Alexander Nunn
Vanderbilt Law Review
The truth matters. At least it should. In the courtroom, truth can serve as the cornerstone of justice, liberating the innocent, vindicating victims, and holding the guilty to account. Indeed, truth is such a normative imperative that an entire legal discipline now focuses on fostering its discovery at trial— evidence law. By regulating both the reliability of proof and the rationality of cognitive inferences, evidence law seeks to help factfinders discern truth and reach an accurate verdict. And given the importance of that role, one might naturally assume that the strict enforcement of evidence law would be a legal mandate …
The Not-So-Silent Side Effects Of Upzoning: Noise Pollution, Mackenzi Barrett
The Not-So-Silent Side Effects Of Upzoning: Noise Pollution, Mackenzi Barrett
Vanderbilt Law Review
A broad coalition has formed to oppose restrictive zoning laws. According to this coalition, zoning is largely to blame for the current housing crisis facing the United States, and to increase the housing supply, cities across the country should embrace upzoning—that is, loosen zoning laws to allow for greater density. Like many other well-intentioned policy changes, upzoning has the possibility for negative unintended consequences. Among those consequences is noise pollution. In recent decades, noise pollution has gone largely undiscussed in the United States. Notwithstanding this neglect, existing research demonstrates that noise pollution can have serious adverse effects on people’s health …
Reasoning From Injustice, Robert L. Tsai
Reasoning From Injustice, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
In a series of lectures at Yale Law School, the Harvard political theorist Judith Shklar critiqued leading models of justice as overly abstract and lacking a realistic account of the social dynamics that perpetuate injustice. In this essay, Professor Tsai builds on Shklar’s account of injustice as a social phenomenon by offering a structural reading of key literary texts that explore the nature of legal injustice—from the Book of Job to Harriett Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Frederick Douglass’s The Heroic Slave. A close reading of these texts permits us to flesh out Shklar’s observations and “give injustice …
Benchmarking Age-Gates, Katharine B. Silbaugh
Benchmarking Age-Gates, Katharine B. Silbaugh
Faculty Scholarship
This article examines how legal actors—particularly legislators, judges, and attorneys—invoke chronological age to justify the application of legal rules to adolescents. In doing so, they often rely on comparisons to existing “age-gates,” treating these thresholds (such as ages 18 or 21) as self-justifying reference points. Age 18, marking the legal transition from childhood to adulthood, and age 21, the former age of majority and current sales age for certain controlled substances, serve as especially powerful rhetorical anchors in age-based legal reasoning. These anchor points shape how legal actors advocate for or against particular age thresholds, often substituting analogy for substantive …
Breaking The Chains: Addressing Criminal Records For Sex Trafficking Survivors Through Vacatur Laws, Charlotte Kessinger
Breaking The Chains: Addressing Criminal Records For Sex Trafficking Survivors Through Vacatur Laws, Charlotte Kessinger
Advanced Issues in Criminal Law: Sex Offenses
No abstract provided.
Cruel, As Usual: Application Of The Eighth Amendment To The Use Of Juvenile Criminal Records In Higher Education Admissions, Rabab Alajmi
Cruel, As Usual: Application Of The Eighth Amendment To The Use Of Juvenile Criminal Records In Higher Education Admissions, Rabab Alajmi
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
This Note addresses the systemic barrier to societal reintegration faced by juvenile offenders applying to enroll in higher education. Specifically, this Note will examine whether, in light of the Fifth Circuit’s recent Hopkins v. Hosemann decision, Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishments should be extended to college applicants with juvenile criminal records who have completed their sentences. This Note argues that the Eighth Amendment reasoning in the Hopkins decision should be applied to higher education institutions who consider an applicant’s juvenile criminal record where the applicant has already completed their sentence. While the Hopkins decision concerned “the …
การกำหนดบทลงโทษทางปกครองและทางอาญาร่วมกันในกรณีความประมาทเลินเล่อของ ภาระผูกพันหลังการทำเหมืองขององค์กร: กรณีศึกษาเปรียบเทียบกฎระเบียบการทำเหมืองแร่ของประเทศอินโดนีเซีย ไทย และแอฟริกาใต้ (A Combined Imposition Of Administrative And Criminal Sanctions For Negligence Of Corporate Post-Mining Obligations: A Comparative Study Of Indonesian, Thailand, And South African Mining Regulations), Fachrian Rizki
Chulalongkorn University Law Journal
วิธีการทางกฎหมายอันเหมาะสมและบทบัญญัติของกฎหมายที่เพียงพอต่อการลงโทษนิติบุคลคลซึ่งละเลยหน้าที่อันต้องกระทำการหลังการขุดเหมืองแร่นั้นถือเป็นประเด็นในทางกฎหมายที่หลายประเทศทั่วโลกไม่ได้ให้ความสนใจเท่าไรนัก นอกจากการละเว้นหน้าที่ดังกล่าวโดยประมาทจะส่งผลร้ายทั้งทางตรงและทางอ้อมต่อสิ่งแวดล้อมและชุมชน บริเวณรอบพื้นที่แล้ว การกระทำดังกล่าวยังส่งผลเสียต่อตัวนิติบุคคลด้วย ในอินโดนีเซียมีผู้เห็นว่าการบังคับใช้มาตรการบังคับทางปกครองเพียงอย่างเดียวก็สามารถป้องปรามการกระทำดังกล่าวได้อย่างเพียงพอ แต่อย่างไรก็ตาม เมื่อได้ศึกษาเปรียบเทียบกฎหมายของอินโดนีเซียกับประเทศไทยและแอฟริกาใต้แล้ว พบว่ามีการใช้มาตรการทางอาญาควบคู่ไปกับมาตรการบังคับทางปกครอง ดังนั้น กรณีดังกล่าวจึงนำมาสู่ปัญหาของงานวิจัยฉบับนี้ว่า การบังคับใช้มาตรการทางอาญาควบคู่ไปกับมาตรการบังคับทางปกครองต่อความผิดฐานละเลยหน้าที่ที่พึงต้องกระทำหลังการขุดเหมืองแร่โดยประมาทจะมีผลสัมฤทธิ์มากกว่าการใช้มาตรการบังคับทางปกครองเพียงอย่างเดียวหรือไม่ และการใช้โทษทางอาญาในความผิดฐานดังกล่าวนั้นขัดต่อหลักความได้สัดส่วนและหลักการกำหนดความผิดในทางอาญาหรือไม่ บทความวิจัยนี้จึงมุ่งศึกษาปัญหาดังกล่าวโดยเน้นการวิเคราะห์หลักเกณฑ์ทางทฤษฎีที่เกี่ยวข้อง และเปรียบเทียบกฎหมายของประเทศไทยและแอฟริกาใต้
Defederalizing Opioid Addication Care, Matthew B. Lawrence
Defederalizing Opioid Addication Care, Matthew B. Lawrence
San Diego Law Review
Lack of access to evidence-based care for drug addiction is an urgent problem amid a decades-long overdose crisis that kills more than one hundred thousand Americans a year. Opioid addiction is the primary driver of overdoses today, and medicines exist to treat such addiction that can dramatically improve quality of life while reducing the risk of deadly overdose by more than half. Yet fewer than one in four of the nine million Americans who need such evidence-based medical care for their addiction receive it. Chief among barriers to access are restrictive and burdensome federal requirements limiting the use of narcotic …
Rights In The Eyes Of The Beholder: The Lived Hierarchy Of Rights In India's Democracy, Sehar Abdullah, Keerthana Satheesh, Prashant Narang
Rights In The Eyes Of The Beholder: The Lived Hierarchy Of Rights In India's Democracy, Sehar Abdullah, Keerthana Satheesh, Prashant Narang
Socio-Legal Review
This paper examines how citizens in India perceive and prioritise fundamental rights, with particular attention to the six freedoms under Article 19(1) and the property right. While the freedoms of Article 19(1) remain central to democratic citizenship, the Forty-Fourth Constitutional Amendment of 1978 reclassified the right to property as a constitutional right under Article 300A. This shift prompts an important question: Does the diminished constitutional rank of property correspond to its place in popular hierarchies of rights? Our in-depth interviews with 26 respondents, whose livelihoods make them especially sensitive to changes in both categories of rights, reveal that citizens continue …
A Different Form Of Post-Op: Healing Survivors Of Domestic Violence Through Prosecutorial Anatomy, Elizabeth Ellick
A Different Form Of Post-Op: Healing Survivors Of Domestic Violence Through Prosecutorial Anatomy, Elizabeth Ellick
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Chacahoula 2025, Volume 92, Alayna Pellegrin
Chacahoula 2025, Volume 92, Alayna Pellegrin
Chacahoula
The 2025 issue of Chacahoula includes December 2024 and May 2025 graduating classes, as well as stunning photography student life on the banks of Bayou Desiard. With features covering students, faculty, and staff, this year's time capsule preserves an academic year in the life of the University of Louisiana at Monroe.