Digital Commons Network^™

Strategy For Strategy’S Sake, Edith Beerdsen

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Undeterred: On The North Carolina General Assembly’S Decision To Double Down On Criminalizing The Opioid Epidemic, Drew Alexander

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Hardest Thing I'Ve Ever Done: Reentry Realities Of Criminalized Survivors, Emunah Evans, Marsha Weissman, Deborah M. Weissman

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sentencing Vulnerability: An Empirical Study Into The Role Of Personal Characteristics And The Foreseeable Experience Of Confinement At The Sentencing Of Older Adults, Adelina Iftene, Allison Hearns

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

This article presents and analyzes findings from a qualitative and quantitative review of reported Nova Scotia sentencing decisions (2013–2020) of aging individuals. The goal is twofold. First, by investigating the judicial discourse around personal characteristics at sentencing aging individuals, we specifically seek to understand where aging, and characteristics that interplay with aging, fit into current sentencing practices and the potential benefits and challenges of considering these factors. Secondly, and more generally, through the case study of older offenders, this article seeks to contribute to the largely theoretical scholarship that has engaged with the need for a methodical inclusion of a …

Trauma-Informed Judicial Practice Meets Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Compassionate Written Judgments In Child Protection Cases, Shelley Kierstead

Articles & Book Chapters

Trauma arises from profoundly distressing life events, and manifests in a range of often overwhelming physical and psychological symptoms. The legal community is increasingly recognizing that clients living with trauma need trauma-informed services—that is, services that “recognize, understand and minimize” the long-term impact of trauma. A trauma-informed approach acknowledges that “effective interventions with people require both the avoidance of retraumatization and the presence of respectful and supportive interventions that help people rebuild their lives.”

Can Prosecutors’ Offices Preserve Public Confidence In Their Nonpartisanship—And, If So, How?, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Doing Justice With Empathy: Black Prosecutors In The Age Of Mass Incarceration, Kevin Woodson

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

No Knock? No Case: Prosecutorial Deterrence As A Countermeasure To No-Knock Warrants, Tamika Griffin Moses

Utah Law Review

The high-profile deaths of Amir Locke and Breonna Taylor ignited a national debate surrounding the legitimacy of no-knock warrants. Their deaths are part of a cycle of reaction and inaction that permeates this debate. As the impacted communities and segments of the populace respond by demanding that federal and state legislatures abolish or severely restrict the use of no-knock warrants, they are met with inaction. The legislative bodies have failed to pass laws banning the warrants and judges continue to sign them. This inaction continues to undermine the public’s trust in law enforcement and challenges the legitimacy of a democracy …

Protecting The Presumption Of Innocence: Tiktok Detectives, Misinformation And Private Content Moderation, Paige Sanders

Utah Law Review

The presumption of innocence is a fundamental component of the American legal system, but modern media platforms undermine its effectiveness. Platforms like TikTok have become popular sites for true crime content, allowing online detectives to spin their own narratives about high-profile crimes, often with little regard for the truth. This trend undermines the integrity of the legal system and causes irreversible harm to those being baselessly accused on social media. While TikTok and other social media platforms employ guidelines to moderate users’ content, they consistently fall short in preventing the spread of unverified true crime content. This Note explores TikTok’s …

Cannabis In The Clink: An Argument In Favor Of Medical Marijuana For Disabled Inmates, Sophia Dechurch

Journal of Law and Health

In recent decades, medical marijuana programs have become commonplace, and most states in the United States of America are ready to accept marijuana as a natural alternative to treat symptoms of certain conditions such as chronic pain, cancer, mental illness, multiple sclerosis (MS), HIV/AIDS, and substance use disorder; as such, medical marijuana is readily accessible to those who have a qualifying diagnosis – the exception being those who are incarcerated. Although disability, substance abuse, and mental illness are prevalent among those under state supervision, these individuals are effectively prohibited from enjoying the benefits of medical marijuana. This Note will provide …

Climbing The Family Tree To Solve Crime: The Statutory Regulation Of Investigative Genetic Genealogy In Wisconsin, Margaret B. Mullican

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

Investigative Genetic Genealogy ("IGG") has emerged as a groundbreaking

tool that law enforcement agencies across the United States

are using to solve their most notorious criminal cases. IGG has led to

remarkable outcomes, such as identifying unknown victims, solving

decades-old violent crimes, and exonerating the innocent. While IGG

has transformed criminal investigations for the better, the tool has

also sparked concerns with the public regarding its haphazard regulation

and its constitutional implications. Despite the tool being

widely used by law enforcement, it remains relatively unregulated,

which has raised concerns about potential misuse, as well as a lack

of transparency and …

High “Status”: Reforming Employment Protections For Medical Cannabis Users Based On Status, Benjamin P. Sheppard

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

This paper explores the inconsistencies in employment protections for medical cannabis users, with a focus on the divergent interpretations of protections based on “status” across different jurisdictions. The analysis begins with an overview of federal and state laws, followed by an examination of varying court approaches to the scope of protections afforded to medical cannabis users. Courts differ in interpreting whether "status" protections extend to cover positive drug test results, leading to significant variations in employment rights depending on jurisdiction. To address these disparities, this paper proposes two model statutes tailored to the level of protection each state may choose …

Leveraging The History And Tradition Framework In Support Of Transgender Americans’ Fundamental Right To Choose A Name, Abigail Franke

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

Transgender people are facing waves of new legislation limiting their right to exist. However, there is an enormous amount of preexisting state laws which limit transgender people’s right to choose a gender affirming name on their own terms. Many current state laws severely restrict the ability of transgender people with prior felony convictions to change their name. These laws limit the ability of people with felony convictions from changing their name: based on the offense, pursuant a time limit, or force transgender people to out themselves. In this note I argue that these state-level laws place an unconstitutional barrier between …

Reasonable Ai: A Negligence Standard, Mihailis E. Diamantis

Vanderbilt Law Review

Even as artificial intelligence (“AI”) promises to turbocharge social and economic progress, its human costs are becoming apparent. For example, selfdriving technology will someday make traffic jams a thing of the past, but technologists now acknowledge that it will never eliminate all traffic deaths. By design, AI behaves in unexpected ways. That is how it finds unanticipated solutions to complex problems. But unpredictability also means that AI will sometimes harm us. To curtail these harms, scholars and lawmakers have proposed strict regulations (to help ensure firms develop safe algorithms) and strict corporate liability (for injuries that nonetheless occur). These rigid …

Not Demented Enough: Dementia And Competency To Stand Trial, Rashmi Goel

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Participatory Defense And Three Pillars Of Criminal Injustice, Isis Misdary

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Deputization And Privileged White Violence, Ekow N. Yankah

Articles

A number of high-profile and racially charged killings, such as Trayvon Martin’s, Kenneth Herring’s, Ahmaud Arbery’s, and Jordan Neely’s, have been at the hands of civilians declaring themselves the law. These deaths stemmed from a phenomenon best described as “deputization.” Deputization describes a latent legal power that has empowered White people throughout American history to claim authority to enforce the law, as they see it, upon racial minorities generally and Black people in particular. This power turned the ancient common law duty to police all felons in England into a specific American common law duty to police Blacks. From the …

A World-Threatening Feeling: Grief, Moral Injury, And Institutional Loss In Rural Courts, Michele Statz

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Race, The Academy, And The Constitution Of The War On Drugs, Jeffrey Bellin, Bennett Capers

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The war on drugs is widely viewed as a policy failure. Despite massive government intrusions on personal liberty, drug addiction, overdoses, and drug-related violence have only in- creased since the war was declared in 1971. David Pozen's new book, The Constitution of the War on Drugs, reveals a constitutional failure as well. Pozen chronicles a host of constitutional arguments that American litigants deployed to protect a "right" to use drugs with surprising, if fleeting, suc- cess. Pozen asks what might have been, exploring why the courts backtracked and effectively re- moved the Constitution as a meaningful obstacle to drug prohibitions. …

The Pro-Defense Constitution, Zamir Ben-Dan

Utah Law Review

The pro-defense Constitution envisioned by the framers had its shortcomings. State power was unconstrained by it. More importantly, the Constitution’s protections only applied to white people; African Americans had no legal rights. The drafters of the Reconstruction Amendments attempted to change this reality in the field of criminal law by making the Bill of Rights applicable to the states. Put another way, the pro-defense Constitution was to protect all persons charged with crimes in the United States. The author avers that this vision of the Constitution must be reclaimed.

Race, The Academy, And The Constitution Of The War On Drugs, Bennett Capers, Jeffrey Bellin

Faculty Publications

The war on drugs is widely viewed as a policy failure. Despite massive government intrusions on personal liberty, drug addiction, overdoses, and drug-related violence have only increased since the war was declared in 1971. David Pozen’s new book, The Constitution of the War on Drugs, reveals a constitutional failure as well. Pozen chronicles a host of constitutional arguments that American litigants deployed to protect a “right” to use drugs with surprising, if fleeting, success. Pozen asks what might have been, exploring why the courts backtracked and effectively removed the Constitution as a meaningful obstacle to drug prohibitions.

This Review …

Individual Liberty, Safety And Police Liabilities Under The Mental Health (Care And Treatment) Act, Gary Kok Yew Chan

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

How should a society strike a balance between the objective of ensuring safety from dangers that may be posed by individuals believed to have a mental disorder and the deprivation of their liberty? How should police officers discharge their duties in apprehending such individuals with a view to conveying them to a medical practitioner at a psychiatric institution? These legal issues took centrestage in the Singapore High Court decision of Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General in which the apprehended individual brought claims in false imprisonment against a police officer. The decision examined the underlying purposes of the Singapore Mental Health …

Can Prosecutors' Offices Preserve Public Confidence In Their Nonpartisanship - And, If So, How?, Rebecca Roiphe, Bruce Green

Articles & Chapters

Politicians, the media, and others erode public confidence in prosecutors by accusing them of “weaponizing” their power in cases with political implications. This essay argues that prosecutors’ offices have a responsibility not only to do their work in accordance with professional norms, training and policy that call for nonpartisan decision-making, but also to make affirmative efforts to restore and preserve public faith that prosecutors are in fact acting neutrally, objectively and impartially. Despite limits to what prosecutors’ offices can do in the current climate, this essay suggests some possible measures to counteract the perception of political bias.

Abolition By Algorithm, Peter N. Salib

Michigan Law Review

In one sense, America’s newest abolitionist movement—advocating the elimination of policing and prison—has been a success. Following the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, a small group of self-described radicals convinced a wide swath of ordinary liberals to accept a sweeping claim: Mere reforms cannot meaningfully reduce prison and policing’s serious harms. Only elimination can. On the other hand, abolitionists have failed to secure lasting policy change. The difficulty is crime. In 2021, following a nationwide uptick in homicides, liberal support for abolitionist proposals collapsed. Despite being newly “abolition curious,” left-leaning voters consistently rejected concrete abolitionist policies. Faced with the difficult …

Public Defender Workload And The Promise Of Gideon, M. Eve Hanan

Scholarly Works

Gideon v. Wainwright, which was decided in 1963, held that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel for poor people charged with crimes in state court.1 Over the six decades since Gideon was decided, states have grappled with how to provide public defense services.

The Mixed Blessing/‌Curse Of The Meyer-Pierce Legacy, Elizabeth Bartholet

The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues

The Supreme Court decisions in Meyer v. Nebraska and Pierce v. Society of Sisters left us a mixed legacy, one part blessing and one part curse. Many would agree on this but differ on which part is blessing and which part curse.

In my view the blessing is the doctrine of substantive due process protecting personal liberty. The Court did not use this language in these cases, but it did rule that the states’ attempts to interfere with parent rights in those cases violated the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and the Court made it clear that in future …

Incentivizing Diversion, Christina E. Miller

New Mexico Law Review

No abstract provided.

Actualizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty Through Tribal Self-Governance, Bailey Ulbricht

New Mexico Law Review

Data, as described by a Yurok Tribe council member, is “the original theft”—the first thing stolen from Native peoples in the United States. Indigenous data sovereignty seeks to redress this and prevent future data infractions by placing Indigenous communities in charge of decision-making about their own data. Yet with no established body of federal case law on tribal data authority, it is not immediately clear how Indigenous data sovereignty would fit within the complex and contradictory web of federal caselaw that confines tribes’ inherent sovereignty. This Article seeks to address this gap. First, as a policy matter, it argues that …

Ai Co-Counsel: An Attorney's Guide To Using Artificial Intelligence In The Practice Of Law Symposium, Brandon Mchugh, David Myers, Ashvi Patel

Akron Law Review

This panel discussion as part of Akron Law Review’s Symposium, discusses how artificial intelligence is changing how to practice law. Panelists will focus on their own practice and how lawyers can integrate artificial intelligence into legal practice. Panelists include Brandon McHugh, an associate attorney with the Akron law firm Plakas Manos; Ashvi Patel, an associate attorney with the global law firm Jones Day; and David Myers, a partner with the northeast Ohio business law firm Buckingham, Doolittle, and Burroughs. The panel was moderated by part-time law review assistant editor and full-time professor in the Department of Criminal Justice Studies at …

Collaborative Study Guide Assignment: Materials, Templates, “Reusable” Pedagogy, Penny Geyer

Open Educational Resources

This collaborative study guide assignment engages undergraduate criminal justice students in defining key concepts related to research methods through a peer-driven, reusable process. Along with an overview, this document includes multiple instructional materials, including a pedagogical rationale for student-created study guides, detailed instructions for six sequential assignments, grading rubrics, and a structured study guide template. Each assignment follows a rotating role system: students alternate between acting as “creators,” who draft definitions and examples for assigned terms, and “editors,” who provide feedback and refine content. Contributions are compiled in a shared doc or within the Brightspace LMS, culminating in a comprehensive, …