Digital Commons Network^™

Social Bulimia And The Deportation Pipeline In New York City, David C. Brotherton, Sarah Tosh

Publications and Research

Twenty-seven years after the IIRAIRA in New York City, that iconic destination of migrants has undergone extraordinary challenges to its status as a welcoming refuge to the tired and teeming masses of the globe. In this article, based on recent qualitative and quantitative research, we trace the policing of its migrant communities as the U.S. state has resorted to increasingly punitive measures to regulate the lives of non-citizens regarded as deportable aliens within the rubric of contemporary immigration laws. Findings from the research show that while the city with its long history of immigrant advocacy has in part resisted the …

Hemp And Marijuana: The Necessity Of Lab Testing For Fair Prosecutions, Jessica Aycock

Pace Law Review

This Article examines the evidentiary and ethical challenges prosecutors nationwide face in distinguishing between hemp and marijuana under current federal and state laws. Following the legalization of hemp under the federal 2018 Farm Bill, the legal distinction between hemp and marijuana now hinges on the concentration of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). This distinction requires quantitative lab testing to be established. Without quantitative lab testing, prosecutors cannot accurately determine THC levels, making it challenging, if not impossible, to meet the burden of proof required for marijuana possession convictions. This Article argues that the absence of testing raises evidentiary and ethical concerns that …

An Innocence‐Centered View Of New Jersey’S Post‐Conviction Jurisprudence: A Symposium - The History Of New Jersey’S State Constitutional Guarantee Against Suspension Of State Habeas Corpus And Its Unconstitutional Suspension In 2009, D. Michael Risinger, Lesley C. Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Innocence-Centered View Of New Jersey’S Post-Conviction Jurisprudence: A Symposium - Introduction To The Symposium With Illustrative Cases, And A List Of Factors Contributing To The Problems Of New Jersey’S Post-Conviction Procedures, Lesley C. Risinger, D. Michael Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Continuing Risk Of Forensic Error And Fraud, Michael J. Saks

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Compensation For The Convicted Innocent In New Jersey: Problems And Recommended Solutions, D. Michael Risinger, Lesley C. Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Towards An Innocence-Centered Post‐Conviction Regime In New Jersey, Lesley C. Risinger, D. Michael Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Smart Resolutions: Exploring The Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Alternative Dispute Resolution, Nadia Ahmad

Cleveland State Law Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a significant impact on most industries, including the legal landscape. Effective AI incorporation has removed barriers to access to justice, resolving issues such as backlogged court systems and inadequate resources for pursuing claims. Similarly, the expediency and cost-effectiveness associated with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have established ADR as a mainstay in most countries to enhance legal accessibility. It was inevitable that AI and ADR were integrated to efficiently deliver justice.

Most automated ADR systems implemented thus far have been with human intervention. As machine learning develops, there are efforts to completely automate ADR, and this …

Developmental Neurobiology And Miller V. Alabama: To What Extent Do Juvenile Brains Change?, Christos D. Strubakos J.D., Ph.D.

Cleveland State Law Review

This article delves into the profound complexities surrounding juvenile violent offenders. The landmark Supreme Court decision in Miller v. Alabama ruled that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional, citing developmental neuroscience that suggests adolescent brains are more amenable to rehabilitation because of their ongoing development. However, this article posits the ruling overlooks critical nuances in brain development. Emerging research indicates some juvenile offenders may exhibit persistent neurological profiles, like structural and functional brain changes, which do not resolve with age, challenging the assumption all young offenders can be rehabilitated as they mature. Through an in-depth analysis of contemporary …

Diabetes Behind Bars: Dissecting Diabetic Deliberate Indifference And Delivering Inmates A More Workable Standard Under The Fourth Amendment, Maggie J. Malloy

Cleveland State Law Review

This Note examines the inadequacies of the current Eighth Amendment framework in safeguarding the constitutional rights of diabetic inmates. It contends that the subjective element of the two-pronged Eighth Amendment claim—often used to assess deliberate indifference—leads to unfair and inconsistent outcomes. To address these shortcomings, this Note draws inspiration from the objective analysis employed in Fourth Amendment excessive force claims, specifically referencing the Supreme Court’s decision in Graham v. Connor. This new framework eliminates the subjective element, and instead replaces it with three objective factors courts should consider when evaluating Eighth Amendment violations related to diabetic medical care. Through …

Is The State Constitutional Guarantee Of The Privilege Of Habeas Corpus Suspended In N.J.?, Bernard K. Freamon

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Empirical Assessment Of New Jersey's Mistaken Imprisonment Act, Jeffrey S. Gutman

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

“Beat My Teeth Out And Then Kick Me In The Stomach For Mumbling”—Denying Compensation To The Innocent Who Pleaded Guilty, Donald A. Dripps

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Pleading For The Fifth: How Assisting Law Enforcement For T & U Visas Violates Immigrants’ Right Against Self-Incrimination, Maya Huffman

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Human trafficking is a transnational crime that has decimated the lives of many innocent victims, especially those seeking to immigrate to the United States. In 2000, Congress enacted the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which created T and U visas for victims of severe forms of trafficking and other crimes, respectively. Although these visas were created to protect especially vulnerable immigrants, they ultimately are more harmful than helpful. A condition for being granted a T or U visa is that the applicant must assist law enforcement in the investigation and prosecution of the perpetrator of the crime they are a victim …

Post-Conviction Relief In Immigration Law: A Valid Solution Or Merely Perpetuating The Problem?, Will Gronefeld

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Immigration courts are underfunded and overwhelmed. Many noncitizens face challenges navigating the complex jurisprudence of immigration law, let alone successfully arguing their claims in court. As a result, the role of counsel takes on an even greater importance for noncitizens. However, no right to counsel exists for noncitizens. Many noncitizens who have built lives in America are deported due to difficulty navigating the complex field of immigration law on their own, not the merits of their claim. Post-conviction relief provides a legal avenue for noncitizens to challenge these decisions. This article explains the role of post-conviction relief, specifically claims of …

Children And Family Unity: The Unintended Effects Of The Unlawful Presence Bars, Shannon Conroy

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

This Article examines the adverse consequences of the unlawful presence bars (ULP bars) on the fundamental right to family unity, with a particular focus on children as collateral victims. While the ULP bars intended to curb entering without inspection, they have had unintended and disproportionate effects on immigrant families, especially children. This Article argues that the ULP bars violate children’s right to family unity, highlighting the legal and social challenges that the bars impose on families. Further, this Article explores the severe challenges faced by families, including the effects on children’s well-being and the disproportionate impact on low-income and immigrant …

Environmental Injustice At Toxic Appalachian Prisons, Molly Baker

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

In the United States, both federal and state governments continue to build prisons at toxic locations despite the serious health and safety hazards for prisoners. This Article discusses how the convergence of destructive and toxic mining operations with the rural prison boom in the Appalachian Mountain region has resulted in grave human rights violations at the hands of government actors. “Toxic prison siting,” the practice of constructing new prisons at toxic former mining sites, in Appalachia continues to violate the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health as laid out in the International Covenant on Economic, …

Barred From Every Angle: Ninety Days To Save Your Life From Arkansas Prisons, Lindsay Mast

Arkansas Law Review

Charlie Vaughn has been incarcerated since 1991 in Arkansas’s Tucker Unit maximum security prison, serving a life sentence for a first-degree murder he did not commit. His actual innocence is simply irrelevant in the State of Arkansas due to strict adherence to procedural court filing rules. He has only been denied without opinion or procedurally barred. Despite both state and federal constitutional protections safeguarding liberty and freedom through various rights, including to counsel, to remain silent, a speedy trial, a jury of peers, and due process, wrongful convictions persist. Arkansas stands out among other top incarceration rate states as one …

Tenant Rights Deserve Consumer Protections: The Case For Overturning State V. Schwab, Robert S. Colton

Washington Law Review

Tenancy is a precarious housing arrangement—tenants do not own their homes yet depend on housing stability as a foundation for engaging in almost all aspects of life. For more than fifty years, Washington law has decreed it a landlord’s responsibility to maintain safe and secure housing for their tenants. As the Washington State Legislature has declared, “[d]ecent housing for the people of Washington state is a most important public concern.” This strong rhetoric remains at odds with State v. Schwab, the sweeping decision issued by the 1985 Washington State Supreme Court removing tenants from the reach of the Consumer …

Growing Pains: The Evolution Of Jlwop Sentences In Washington, Selena M. Galvan

Washington Law Review

In 2021, the Washington State Supreme Court abolished de facto life sentences— those that amount to a life sentence despite not carrying the life without parole label—for juvenile offenders, finding them unconstitutional under article 1, section 14 of the Washington Constitution. In 2022, less than a year later, the Court reversed course in the case of State v. Anderson by upholding a sixty-one-year sentence for crimes a juvenile offender committed at age seventeen. The Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in Anderson runs contrary to what modern science demonstrates about the diminished culpability of juvenile offenders, and it runs contrary to …

Properly Partitioning Prejudice: Analyzing Mixed Brady And Napue Claims, Patrick Scariano

Fordham Law Review

Due process affords criminal defendants the right to receive evidence possessed by the government that would aid in their defense. This right was codified in Brady v. Maryland. Brady’s lesser-known ancestor is Napue v. Illinois, which gave defendants the right to a new trial if the government knowingly offered perjured testimony in their original trial. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that these rights are critical to support verdicts worthy of confidence necessary to ensure due process.

Unfortunately, defendants victimized by misconduct are often affected by multiple violations of their rights. Courts have developed ways to examine …

Judging Demeanor, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Julia Simon-Kerr

Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that defendant demeanor—affect, body language, and physical appearance—helps juries assess guilt. On the contrary, we show that demeanor evidence poses an inherent risk of propensity-based reasoning. It invites jurors to convict defendants based on whether they “look like criminals,” rather than on the actual facts of the case. In doing so, demeanor evidence facilitates cultural and racial subordination. It enables members of dominant groups—consciously or not—to penalize members of less-dominant groups for failing to appear innocent or credible. We argue that existing law has things backwards. It treats defendant demeanor as presumptively useful and …

Voter F̶R̶A̶U̶D̶ Mistake, Benjamin Plener Cover

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

False narratives challenging electoral integrity often cite ineligible voting as a prime example of so-called widespread voter fraud. This Article demonstrates that ineligible voting often consists of mistakes that are problematically treated like fraud. Some jurisdictions criminalize ineligible voting on a strict liability basis, imposing punishment even when the ineligible voter is unaware of her ineligibility. When jurisdictions impose this strict criminal liability, mistakes are often misunderstood or misrepresented as fraud. This harsh and confused treatment of voter mistake undermines the criminal justice system by severing criminality from culpability, punishing good faith democratic participation, targeting marginalized populations, and amplifying systemic …

Rivers V. Guerrero, Meagan R. Hurley

Articles

Danny Rivers sought federal habeas relief, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Rivers’s petition was denied, but while his initial habeas appeal was pending, he initiated a second filing to include new information that his prior counsel failed to utilize in an exculpatory report supporting his innocence. Applying 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), the district court determined it was “without jurisdiction to entertain” the new evidence because Rivers’s filing was a “second or successive” petition. The Fifth Circuit of Appeals agreed.

What's Important To Write About? A Century Of Washington Law Review Topics, Hugh Spitzer

Washington Law Review

This Article examines the topics of all lead articles in Washington Law Review during its past ninety-eight years of publication. The analysis illustrates the changing interests of legal academics, student editors, and the working lawyers and judges who have read and used the articles over a century. For its first fifty years, the journal focused on general topics of interest to practitioners, Washington law matters, business and tax law, and government regulation. Other topics, such as legal and judicial system reform, constitutional law, and comparative and international law, were present in modest numbers. In its second half century, Washington Law …

Barlow V. Washington: Judicial Hesitancy And Sexual Violence At Universities, Elizabeth G. Porter

Washington Law Review

Sexual violence among university students—most frequently, violence against women—is a well-known and pernicious problem. But the liability of universities for failing to prevent such violence is exceedingly rare. Courts remain hesitant to impose a duty on universities to prevent sexual violence, even in situations where they are in by far the best position to do so. This Article examines that judicial hesitancy in the context of a claim by Madeleine Barlow, who sued Washington State University (WSU) after she was raped at an off-campus party in her first week of college by a student with a record of past sexual …

Washington's Implementation Of Legalized Cannabis: A Model For Other States And The Federal Government, Bruce Turcott, Daniel Shortt

Washington Law Review

This Article examines the process and outcomes of cannabis legalization in Washington State, offering insights for other states and potential federal legalization schemes. It begins with an overview of the campaign that led to the passage of Initiative 502 (I-502), detailing the initiative’s structure, which draws from liquor licensing laws. The Article then explores the establishment of a recreational cannabis market from scratch, focusing on agency structure, federal responses such as the Cole Memorandum, and the state’s regulatory framework aimed at preventing adverse outcomes.

Additionally, this Article highlights Washington’s efforts to promote social equity, emphasizing that I-502 was framed as …

Mitigation That Worked: Empirical Evidence Of Why Jurors Rejected The Death Penalty In Some Highly Aggravated Capital Cases, Russell Stetler, Maria Mclaughlin, Susan Garvey

Hofstra Law Review

Over several years, we have documented over 625 highly aggravated cases where jurors declined to impose the death penalty at sentencing. These cases support our belief that the effective investigation and presentation of mitigating evidence can forestall a death sentence no matter how death-worthy the crime facts may appear at first glance. However, our previous publications shed no light on the specific mitigation evidence that inspired jurors to reject the death penalty in individual cases. This Article summarizes readily available documentary sources from over five hundred cases (more than eighty percent of all the cases in our database), utilizing special …

Camera-Shy Courtrooms: Balancing Extraordinary Transparency And The Appearance Of Justice, Caroline Olsen

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

High-profile trials alert us to the dissonance between transparency and accountability in the federal judiciary. This Note will explore this tension and argue that when policymakers respond to calls for “extraordinary transparency,” transparency should be subordinate to fairness. Part I will discuss the principles underlying public adjudication and how, through various constitutional challenges, the limits of public access have changed over time. Analyzing modern high-profile trials, Part II will demonstrate how those very principles are inadequately protected in jurisdictions that allow unrestrained public access to the courtroom. Part III will describe how transparency, when conflated with accountability, threatens procedural due …

State And Federal Constitutional Right To Counsel In An Age Of Case Specific Inadequacies, Brent R. Appel

UMKC Law Review

No abstract provided.