Digital Commons Network^™

National Socialism And German Jurisprudence From 1933 To 1945, Arthur Kaufmann

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Vol. 11 No. 3 (1988): Pacific Studies Front Matter, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Neoslavery - Surrogate Motherhood Contracts V. The Thirteenth Amendment, Lorraine Stone

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Freedom Coercion And The Law Of Servitudes , Gregory S. Alexander

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Freedom, Coercion, And The Law Of Servitudes, Gregory S. Alexander

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

What do we want from a restatement of servitude law? Doctrinal simplification presents one obvious objective. Property teachers and their students commonly observe that the law of servitudes is a mess. However, doctrinal simplification surely does not present the only objective of the restatement. Developing a unified body of servitude doctrine, by itself, merely creates a sense of aesthetic coherence. Presumably the project aims at achieving more than just that. Law reformers generally seek to enhance the legal system's substantive coherence. At this level--developing a set of substantively coherent doctrinal practices--I am skeptical about the servitude restatement project.

A restatement …

Vol. 11 No. 3 (1988): Pacific Studies Full Issue, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Contributors: Vol 11 No. 3, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Contributors list of Vol. 11 (1988): Pacific Studies Full Issue 3

Reflections On Willful, Wanton, Reckless, And Gross Negligence, Edwin H. Byrd Iii

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Big Pictures And Little Puzzles, D. Don Welch

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Three Criminal Law Books, Roger Groot

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Force, Stanley E. Fish

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is This Really Necessary? - Beyond Regulation: The Indigenous Problem Of Attorney Self-Importance And Abuse Of The English Language

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Uncharged Misconduct Under Rule 404(B): The Admissibility Of Inextricably Intertwined Evidence, Jennifer Y. Schuster

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conference Program

Group Defamation & Freedom of Speech: The Relationship Between Language and Violence (1988)

No abstract provided.

Al-Aziz V. Commander Of Idf Forces In The West Bank, Meir Shamgar, Shlomo Levin, Eliezer Goldberg, Miriam Ben-Porat, Gavriel Bach

Translated Opinions

The military commanders of the various occupied territories, acting pursuant to the Defence (Emergency) Regulations, 1945, ordered the deportation of the Petitioners from the territories, on the ground that they are involved in hostile activities against the State of Israel, such as to endanger the security of the state and the public peace. The Petitioners contend that the deportation orders violate Article 49 of the Fourth Hague Convention of 1949. Sitting in a panel of five Justices, the court denied the petitions, holding:

1. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention must be interpreted against the background of the outrages …

Constitutional Rhetoric And The Ninth Amendment, Sanford Levinson

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

You Can Raise The First, Hide Behind The Fourth, And Plead The Fifth - But What On Earth Can You Do With The Ninth Amendment, Lawrence G. Sager

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Practical Implications Of Ins V. Cardoza-Fonseca: Evidencing Eligibility For Asylum Under The "Well-Founded Fear Of Persecution" Standard, Humberto H. Ocariz, Jorge L. Lopez

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Uses Of An Unwritten Constitution, Thomas C. Grey

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bankruptcy Code Section 362(D)(2): Protecting Turnkey Sale Values In Liquidations Under The Bankruptcy Code, David W. Meadows

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Obligation Clause Of The United States Constitution: Public And/Or Private Contracts, Robert L. Clinton

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Better Trials Through Science: A Defense Of Psychologist-Lawyer Collaboration, J. Alexander Tanford, Sarah Tanford

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Republicanism, Imperialism, And Sovereignty: A History Of The Doctrine Of Tribal Sovereignty, Jane M. Smith

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Exchange-Trading Requirement Of The Commodity Exchange Act, William L. Stein

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) makes it illegal to trade a contract for the purchase or sale of a commodity for future delivery-a"futures contract"-unless the contract is executed on a federally designated exchange. Despite its long history of trouble-free administration and operation, this central premise of futures regulation recently has been attacked as unworkable and undesirable. Some argue that the requirement discourages commercially useful off-exchange transactions. They claim that even if such transactions fall within the letter of the requirement, off-exchange transactions do not implicate the trading restriction's policy concerns. In contrast, others suggest that off-exchange

transactions threaten the safety …

The Indian Supply Drop Into Sri Lanka: Nonmilitary Humanitarian Aid And The Troubling Idea Of Intervention, Paul J. Costa, Peter Evans

Connecticut Journal of International Law

On 4 June 1987, five Indian military jets escorted a number of cargo planes carrying food and medical supplies into Sri Lankan airspace. Despite this clear violation of Sri Lankan territorial integrity, the New Delhi government maintained that its actions were "humanitarian assistance" to the beleaguered Tamil civilians under attack by Sri Lankan troops in that country's northern Jaffna peninsula.

Once generally accepted as legal means to protect foreign citizens' from substantial abuses of human rights, humanitarian intervention has fallen into disfavor in the twentieth century.' Perhaps the main deterrent to use of this doctrine is article 2(4) of the …

Mythical Stereotypes-Dealing With Mexico As A Lawyer, Michael Wallace Gordon

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Vol. 11 No. 2 (1988): Pacific Studies Front Matter, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Vol. 11 No. 2 (1988): Pacific Studies Full Issue, The Jonathan Nāpela Center For Hawaiian And Pacific Islands Studies

Pacific Studies

Pacific Studies is published two times a year by The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies, Brigham Young University Hawai‘i #1979, 55–220 Kulanui Street, Lāʻie, Hawai‘i 96762, but responsibility for opinions expressed in the articles rests with the authors alone. Subscription rate is US$40.00 yearly, payable to The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies. The Jonathan Nāpela Center for Hawaiian and Pacific Studies (formerly The Pacific Institute) is an organization funded by Brigham Young University Hawai‘i. The Center assists the University in meeting its cultural and educational goals by undertaking a program of teaching, research, and …

Fundamentals Of Jurisprudence: An Ethnography Of Judicial Decision Making In Informal Courts, John M. Conley, William M. O'Barr

North Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Motions 1988 Volume 1 Number 3, University Of San Diego School Of Law Student Bar Association

Newspaper, Motions (1987-2019)

No abstract provided.