Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (7903)
- University of Michigan Law School (5825)
- Fordham Law School (4649)
- Duke Law (4617)
- American University Washington College of Law (4014)
-
- William & Mary Law School (3748)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3608)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3442)
- UC Law SF (3210)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3158)
- University of San Diego (2997)
- Southern Methodist University (2972)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2920)
- University of Colorado Law School (2875)
- University of Minnesota Law School (2811)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2688)
- Notre Dame Law School (2685)
- Seton Hall University (2651)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (2635)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2577)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2418)
- University of Chicago Law School (2394)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2366)
- University of Richmond (2347)
- University of South Carolina (2286)
- University of Washington School of Law (2114)
- Columbia Law School (2095)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2037)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2017)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1994)
- Keyword
-
- Law (2458)
- Human rights (1493)
- Constitutional law (1349)
- Discrimination (1201)
- Privacy (1165)
-
- Regulation (1163)
- Supreme Court (1123)
- First Amendment (1093)
- Constitutional Law (1089)
- International law (1082)
- United States (1042)
- Environmental law (1010)
- Climate change (989)
- Abortion (957)
- Women (933)
- Legislation (922)
- International Law (836)
- Federalism (808)
- Children (804)
- Constitution (801)
- Ethics (800)
- Criminal law (749)
- Health care (737)
- Education (730)
- COVID-19 (726)
- Administrative law (719)
- Civil rights (701)
- Race (694)
- Torts (691)
- United States Supreme Court (690)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8295)
- Articles (4051)
- Faculty Publications (3400)
- Michigan Law Review (1983)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1845)
-
- Fordham Law Review (1706)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (1661)
- North Carolina Law Review (1605)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (1590)
- Scholarly Works (1536)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (1473)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (1455)
- Journal Articles (1270)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1242)
- Indiana Law Journal (1241)
- SMU Law Review (1193)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1172)
- West Virginia Law Review (1130)
- UC Law Journal (1126)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1087)
- Louisiana Law Review (1084)
- Faculty Articles (1077)
- Missouri Law Review (1057)
- McGeorge Law Review (1055)
- Minnesota Law Review, Vols. 1-106:1 (1917-2021) (1051)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (1044)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1035)
- Cardozo Law Review (1033)
- Washington Law Review (1033)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1020)
- Publication Type
Articles 7321 - 7350 of 183818
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Standardization And Accuracy Of Race And Ethnicity Data: Equity Implications For Medical Ai, Alexandra Tsalidis, Lakshmi Bharadwaj, Francis X. Shen
Standardization And Accuracy Of Race And Ethnicity Data: Equity Implications For Medical Ai, Alexandra Tsalidis, Lakshmi Bharadwaj, Francis X. Shen
Articles
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has raised many concerns about race bias in AI models. Yet, overlooked in this dialogue is the lack of quality control for the accuracy of patient race and ethnicity (r/e) data in electronic health records (EHR). This article critically examines the factors driving inaccurate and unrepresentative r/e datasets. These include conceptual uncertainties about how to categorize races and ethnicity, shortcomings in data collection practices, EHR standards, and the misclassification of patients’ race or ethnicity. To address these challenges, we propose a two-pronged action plan. First, we present a set of …
Ai Assistance In Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study, Jonathan H. Choi, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz
Ai Assistance In Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study, Jonathan H. Choi, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz
Articles
No abstract provided.
Free To Be You But Not Me?, Leah Litman
Free To Be You But Not Me?, Leah Litman
Reviews
In Gendered Liberty, Prof. Laura Portuondo presents a doctrinal puzzle: While claims to individual liberty are in decline in some spaces, they are ascendant in others. As Portuondo describes things, constitutional law has become increasingly hostile to claims by people who seek to defy gendered stereotypes. That includes the women who, for whatever reason, do not want to become mothers when they are pregnant, as well as the women whose lives, health, or fertility would be in jeopardy if they became mothers. The Supreme Court overruled their claims to liberty in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Curbing Harmful Force: Mandatory Jiu-Jitsu Training For Police, Mason Arent
Curbing Harmful Force: Mandatory Jiu-Jitsu Training For Police, Mason Arent
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
From Choice To Justice: Examining The Intertwined Oppression Of Abortion Restriction And Family Policing, Casey Callahan
From Choice To Justice: Examining The Intertwined Oppression Of Abortion Restriction And Family Policing, Casey Callahan
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Cbp One App: A Virtual Manifestation Of The American Government's Failure To Uphold Its Moral And Legal Obligations To Asylum Seekers, Joseph Choe
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Terrorizing Who? Luigi Mangione's Terrorism Charge And The Threat To Capital, Julia Hopkins
Terrorizing Who? Luigi Mangione's Terrorism Charge And The Threat To Capital, Julia Hopkins
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
No Child Left Behind: Individualized Active Shooter Drill Planning As A Requirement Of A Free, Appropriate Public Education, Anna Patton
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Disposability And Survival: The Legal And Social Marginalization Of Black Transwomen, Rachel Still
Disposability And Survival: The Legal And Social Marginalization Of Black Transwomen, Rachel Still
Public Interest Law Reporter
The criminalization of Black transwomen emerges not as an incidental consequence of law but as a deliberate, structural process intertwined with a long history of racial, gendered, and class-based oppression. From the horrors of slavery to contemporary policing, the state has consistently defined and regulated Black trans bodies through a lens of disposability. This article explores the historical and contemporary forces that contribute to the marginalization and criminalization of Black transwomen, emphasizing how race, gender, and socio-economic status intersect to create a landscape of legal violence that continues to shape their lives and deaths.
The experiences of Black transwomen reveal …
Prisons Built On Toxic Sites: Eighth Amendment Protections For Pregnant Incarcerated Persons, Bianca Stockmeier
Prisons Built On Toxic Sites: Eighth Amendment Protections For Pregnant Incarcerated Persons, Bianca Stockmeier
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Resource List, Public Interest Law Reporter
Resource List, Public Interest Law Reporter
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Public Right Vs. Private Interest: The Role Of Corporate Entities In Eroding Free Expression, Jack Henry
Public Right Vs. Private Interest: The Role Of Corporate Entities In Eroding Free Expression, Jack Henry
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Insulin: America’S Deadly Pharmaceutical Profiteering Crisis, Elizabeth Hernandez
Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Insulin: America’S Deadly Pharmaceutical Profiteering Crisis, Elizabeth Hernandez
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Did The Supreme Court Authorize Kidney Discrimination? An Analysis Of Marietta Memorial Hospital V. Davita Dialysis, Emily Miller
Did The Supreme Court Authorize Kidney Discrimination? An Analysis Of Marietta Memorial Hospital V. Davita Dialysis, Emily Miller
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Calculated Ignorance: The Trump Administration’S Indifference To The Climate Crisis, Payton Fallick
Calculated Ignorance: The Trump Administration’S Indifference To The Climate Crisis, Payton Fallick
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Unfulfilled Promise Of Obergefell For Children Of Lgbtq+ Parents: Advancing Non-Discrimination Laws For Familial Association, Jeffrey Dodge
The Unfulfilled Promise Of Obergefell For Children Of Lgbtq+ Parents: Advancing Non-Discrimination Laws For Familial Association, Jeffrey Dodge
Faculty Scholarship
Since the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, same-sex marriages have increased significantly in the United States. The American Community Survey data collected in 2022 shows that there are around 1.3 million same-sex couple households in the country, up from 565,000 in 2028. Just over half of these couples are legally married, up nearly 400% from prior to Obergefell. This data not only shows the significance of Obergefell for the LGBTQ+ community, but it also frames a generational shift in attitudes on marriage and family.
With the rise in same-sex couples accessing marriage has come greater visibility, representation, and acknowledgement. …
More Than Miscommunication: Rethinking Interpretation At The Asylum Office, Pooja R. Dadhania, Hillary Mellinger
More Than Miscommunication: Rethinking Interpretation At The Asylum Office, Pooja R. Dadhania, Hillary Mellinger
Faculty Scholarship
The United States requires asylum applicants to provide their own interpreters for their interviews at the Asylum Office, barring exceptional circumstances. Applicants can face significant hurdles in finding suitable interpreters, who play a critical role in giving them a voice in the asylum process. Inaccurate interpretation can have serious ramifications such as denial of an applicant’s asylum claim. Despite the critical need for meaningful language access in the asylum process, interpretation at the Asylum Office remains understudied. This article represents a first attempt at bringing the scholarly and practitioner communities together to rethink interpretation at the Asylum Office, with the …
An Economic Comparison Of Succession Law Systems: Prioritizing Spouses Vs. Forced Shares For Children And Proposal For A Standards Based Approach To Child Disinheritance
Florida A & M University Law Review
In the United States (“U.S.”), the foundation of succession law is the freedom of disposition. Priority is placed on the testator’s freedom to choose what happens with their property after they die. Thus, laws governing the distribution of property in both testate and intestate situations are aimed at honoring the testator’s intent. In the U.S., spouses are given preferential treatment under succession laws and intestacy laws. However, children are not given as great a level of protection as spouses and a testator can legally disinherit a child. This approach is unique because several other countries, along with one U.S. state, …
Keynote Address - Intimate Privacy, Expressive Power, And Trust: Essential Inputs For A Healthy Democracy, Danielle Keats Citron
Keynote Address - Intimate Privacy, Expressive Power, And Trust: Essential Inputs For A Healthy Democracy, Danielle Keats Citron
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Artificial Intelligence Trolley Problem, James Cooper, Kashyap Kompella
The Artificial Intelligence Trolley Problem, James Cooper, Kashyap Kompella
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay addresses a growing Constitutional challenge in public governance: the increasing delegation of consequential decisions to algorithmic systems that encode value trade-offs between liberty and security, equity and efficiency, and expression and control, without visibility, legal justification, or institutional oversight. We view this hidden normative choice an example of the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trolley Problem.” Like the classic moral dilemma, it involves unavoidable sacrifices among competing goods. Unlike its philosophical counterpart, however, algorithmic trade-offs occur silently. They are embedded in data proxies, optimization logic, and model design, and insulated from scrutiny by claims of technical neutrality. This Essay argues …
Legalized Surveillance: The Historical To Modern Policing Of Black Life, Nile Blass
Legalized Surveillance: The Historical To Modern Policing Of Black Life, Nile Blass
Upper Level Writing Requirement Research Papers
No abstract provided.
The Nauru Declaration: A Milestone For Judicial Wellness, Rangajeeva Wimalasena, Lynne C. Leitch, Carly Schrever, Jeremy Fogel
The Nauru Declaration: A Milestone For Judicial Wellness, Rangajeeva Wimalasena, Lynne C. Leitch, Carly Schrever, Jeremy Fogel
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Social Justice Unionism: Intersectionality In The Twenty-First Century Workplace, Shirley Lin
Social Justice Unionism: Intersectionality In The Twenty-First Century Workplace, Shirley Lin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Parafamily, Christina Mulligan
Gendered Liberty, Laura Portuondo
Access Or Sovereignty, John T. Holden
Access Or Sovereignty, John T. Holden
Emory Law Journal
Despite centuries of genocidal assimilation and forced removal, Indigenous communities in the United States have persevered and even thrived. A key driver of economic success for many tribes is gambling. While states objected, perhaps out of greed, the Supreme Court held that, as sovereign governments, gaming operations on tribal land were largely beyond the reach of state governments and law enforcement. The Supreme Court’s Cabazon decision furthered a congressional push to develop a negotiated solution to recognize Indigenous communities’ rights as sovereigns while balancing states’ desire to limit the volume of gambling taking place within their borders. The Indian Gaming …
Health Is Wealth: Strengthening Plaintiffs’ Ability To Confer Standing In Health Information Data Breach Cases, Kayla M. O'Brien
Health Is Wealth: Strengthening Plaintiffs’ Ability To Confer Standing In Health Information Data Breach Cases, Kayla M. O'Brien
Emory Law Journal
Individuals’ health information is increasingly at risk of data breaches as healthcare providers adopt health information technologies and individuals use digital devices and applications to log their health data. The frequency of data breaches involving health information has escalated year after year, and, as a result, more individuals are seeking recourse in federal court. To proceed in federal court, however, these individuals must have Article III standing, and meeting the injury-in-fact requirement to confer standing has been a difficult hurdle for plaintiffs in data breach cases to overcome. Federal courts have narrowly interpreted what constitutes a concrete harm stemming from …
Technological Readiness Versus Disruption: A Framework For Assessing Distinct Artificial Intelligence Policy Strategies, Orly Lobel
Emory Law Journal
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is here and rapidly advancing. As the 2024 Thrower Symposium of the Emory Law Journal demonstrated, developments in the integration of AI to all aspects of life raise fundamental challenges for legal scholars and policymakers about the desirability and legitimacy of algorithmic decision-making, the societal impact of automation, and the liability, ownership, and regulatory puzzles created by substituting human actions with AI systems. This Article provides a framework for analyzing the readiness and desirability of contemporary technological innovation while continuing to address the effects and impact of technological shifts on the labor market, social welfare, and democracy. …
Civil Society And The Crisis Of Privacy Law, Ari Ezra Waldman
Civil Society And The Crisis Of Privacy Law, Ari Ezra Waldman
Emory Law Journal
Based on interviews with key players, public reports, and previously undisclosed primary sources, this Article tells the inside story of the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA) and the role of privacy nonprofit organizations in crafting it. It uses ADPPA’s drafting as a case study about larger questions of expertise, the lawmaking process, and the role of law in setting the context of advocacy. The Article’s descriptive argument is that background law and the dynamics of privacy policymaking in the United States Congress channeled and constrained the choices made by privacy civil society organizations while negotiating and drafting key …
The Globalization Of Copyright Exceptions For Ai Training, Matthew Sag, Peter K. Yu
The Globalization Of Copyright Exceptions For Ai Training, Matthew Sag, Peter K. Yu
Emory Law Journal
Generative AI, machine learning, and other computational uses of copyrighted works pose profound conceptual questions for copyright law. This Article surveys multiple countries with different legal traditions and local conditions to explore how they have responded to these questions in relation to the use of copyrighted works for AI training without express permission from the relevant rightsholders. Our survey suggests an emerging international equilibrium in which jurisdictions from around the world have found ways to reconcile copyright law and AI training. In this equilibrium, countries recognize that text and data mining, computational data analysis, and AI training can be socially …