Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (769)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (753)
- UC Law SF (738)
- UIC School of Law (686)
- American University Washington College of Law (634)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (512)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (439)
- University of Michigan Law School (410)
- Seattle University School of Law (330)
- University of Washington School of Law (324)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (280)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (261)
- Columbia Law School (259)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (255)
- William & Mary Law School (213)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (205)
- Duke Law (197)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (196)
- Marquette University Law School (186)
- University of Richmond (185)
- Boston University School of Law (178)
- The University of Akron (160)
- Santa Clara Law (145)
- Georgetown University Law Center (141)
- BLR (137)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (127)
- Southern Methodist University (126)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (125)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (122)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (120)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (1633)
- Intellectual property (1145)
- Patent (604)
- Patents (479)
- Copyright law (450)
-
- Patent law (408)
- Trademark (407)
- Fair use (320)
- Intellectual Property Law (289)
- Intellectual Property (285)
- Technology (275)
- Copyright infringement (257)
- Internet (228)
- Infringement (226)
- Law (191)
- Copyright Act (175)
- First Amendment (172)
- Lanham Act (169)
- Innovation (142)
- Trademark law (139)
- Trademarks (139)
- Antitrust (134)
- Licensing (127)
- IP (126)
- Privacy (119)
- Patent infringement (116)
- Federal Circuit (113)
- Artificial intelligence (110)
- NJTIP (108)
- Inc. (105)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (764)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (721)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (656)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (444)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (406)
-
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (396)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (234)
- Seattle University Law Review (228)
- Articles (223)
- Faculty Publications (208)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (204)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (200)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (172)
- Michigan Law Review (163)
- Cardozo Law Review (160)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (147)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (138)
- ExpressO (133)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (129)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (123)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (118)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (113)
- American University Law Review (109)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (107)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (106)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (102)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (99)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (99)
- William & Mary Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11761 - 11790 of 12276
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
First Amendment Protection Of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation Of Video Games, John E. Sullivan
First Amendment Protection Of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation Of Video Games, John E. Sullivan
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note proposes that video game software, the driving force of all video game entertainment, is an artistic creation of a video game designer. Because the United States Supreme Court repeatedly has recognized that artistic expression and entertainment are forms of expression that the first amendment protects, video game software deserves first amendment protection. Video game software is the "heart and soul"" of the video game, and first amendment protection, therefore, also should blanket the game itself. Accordingly, free "speech" liberties give video game manufacturers, distributors, and operators a fundamental right to purvey the protected expression; and the public a …
An Economic Analysis Of Royalty Terms In Patent Licenses, Michael J. Meurer
An Economic Analysis Of Royalty Terms In Patent Licenses, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
Efficient exploitation of a patent often requires patentees to license users of their inventions. The courts, on the other hand, have proscribed many forms of license agreements and discouraged patent licensing in general, thereby diminishing the efficacy of the patent system as a stimulus to R & D. This negative attitude is attributable to fears that licensing will be used to protect invalid patents and secure illegitimate extensions of monopoly power. Part I of this Note reviews judicial treatment of certain royalty terms in patent licenses, describing the restraints the courts have imposed on the freedom of patentees to license …
Copyright And Factual Works—Is Research Protected?—Miller V. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1981), Edwin K. Sato
Copyright And Factual Works—Is Research Protected?—Miller V. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1981), Edwin K. Sato
Washington Law Review
Gene Miller, a reporter for the Miami Herald, collaborated with a kidnapping victim in writing the book 83 Hours Till Dawn. The book detailed the victim's experience of being placed in a coffin-like container and buried alive in the Georgia woods for five days. Universal City Studios negotiated with Miller to purchase the movie rights to the work, but no agreement was reached. Nevertheless, Universal produced and aired a television movie about the kidnapping. Miller brought an action alleging that Universal's making of the movie infringed his copyright in the book. The trial court instructed the jury that, while facts …
Problems In Giving Obscenity Copyright Protection: Did Jartech And Mitchell Brothers Go Too Far?, Kurt L. Schmalz
Problems In Giving Obscenity Copyright Protection: Did Jartech And Mitchell Brothers Go Too Far?, Kurt L. Schmalz
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development traces in part II the emergence of the rule that obscenity is not copyrightable. Part III then examines the courts' reasoning in Mitchell Brothers and Jartech and analyzes the impact of these cases on copyright law. Part IV finds that although these courts properly vindicate free expression, they fail to recognize adequately the national policy against obscenity and the inconsistency of affording federal copyright protection to materials that violate federal obscenity laws. Thus, this Recent Development argues that the strong national policy against obscenity, as manifested in federal anti-obscenity statutes, requires courts in some cases to deny …
The Developing Methodology For Analyzing Privacy Torts, Duncan M. Davidson, Jean A. Kunkel
The Developing Methodology For Analyzing Privacy Torts, Duncan M. Davidson, Jean A. Kunkel
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The authors assert the need for a common method of analyzing privacy situations that can be applied consistently by practitioners, juries and courts. They contend that confusion exists as to the legal basis of privacy torts because the right of privacy, as originally conceived by Warren and Brandeis, was never adequately defined. Prosser's analysis of privacy torts departs from the Warren and Brandeis formulation and, according to the authors, also can be criticized for lack of definition. The authors present a new methodology that analyzes privacy torts based upon the scope of consent standard. They maintain that the result will …
Eliminating The Network/Cable Cross-Ownership Ban: Does A Free Market Protect The Marketplace Of Ideas, Noy S. Davis
Eliminating The Network/Cable Cross-Ownership Ban: Does A Free Market Protect The Marketplace Of Ideas, Noy S. Davis
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
As part of its policy of deregulation, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed eliminating its rule that prohibits broadcast networks from owning cable systems. This note examines a report by two of the FCC's staffs in which it is recommended that the network/ cable cross-ownership ban rule be abolished. The note discusses the economic and first amendment considerations behind the ban and proposes a market analysis to be used in determining whether first amendment concerns are better protected with or without the rule.
The Copyrightability Of Jokes: Take My Registration Deposit...Please, Gayle Herman
The Copyrightability Of Jokes: Take My Registration Deposit...Please, Gayle Herman
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In an examination of the copyrightability of jokes, this note explores the limitations of the existing case law in preventing the pirating of the material of joke writers and analyzes how the unique features of a joke inhibit protection under the 1976 Copyright Act. The note concludes with suggestions for affording the joke-writing industry more protection, including changes in the judicial interpretation of the copyright law and regulatory licensing by the profession itself.
Cable-Copyright: The Corruption Of Consensus, Leslie A. Swackhamer
Cable-Copyright: The Corruption Of Consensus, Leslie A. Swackhamer
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The author examines the cable-copyright issue of whether Congress should impose full copyright liability on cable. In an historical overview, the author details the origins of the FCC's .Consensus Agreement and the compulsory license provision of the 1976 Copyright Revision Act as it limits copyright liability. The writer explores the continued validity of the compulsory license in view of the financial growth and stability of the cable industry and the video marketplace and analyzes the effect of the FCC's deregulation of cable on the Consensus Agreement and the Copyright Royalty Tribunal. The author suggests that copyright principles dictate that imposing …
Draft Of The Misappropriation Explosion: Thoughts On The Development Of Property Rights - 1983, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft Of The Misappropriation Explosion: Thoughts On The Development Of Property Rights - 1983, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
The piece on which I am currently working explores courts' growing willingness to create tort and property rights in the intellectual property area, and their insensitivity to any danger of paralysis which a large degree of exclusivity may impose on an interdependent society. The following will summarize the directions the article is taking at this preliminary stage of research and thinking.
Software Piracy And The Personal Computer: Is The 1980 Software Copyright Act Effective?, 4 Computer L.J. 171 (1983), Mickey T. Mihm
Software Piracy And The Personal Computer: Is The 1980 Software Copyright Act Effective?, 4 Computer L.J. 171 (1983), Mickey T. Mihm
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Ownership Of Access Information: Exploring The Application Of Copyright Law To Library Catalog Records, 4 Computer L.J. 305 (1983), Celia Delano Moore
Ownership Of Access Information: Exploring The Application Of Copyright Law To Library Catalog Records, 4 Computer L.J. 305 (1983), Celia Delano Moore
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Trouble With T-Shirts: Merchandise Bootlegging In The Music Industry, Andrew E. Clark
The Trouble With T-Shirts: Merchandise Bootlegging In The Music Industry, Andrew E. Clark
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Merchandise bootlegging is a serious problem in the music industry. Since potential profits are enormous and the bootleggers' costs of doing business are negligible, a host of entrepreneurs have entered the bootlegging business and are reaping millions of dollars of illicit profits. Artists and licensed merchandisers through legal efforts have helped to alleviate the problem but additional action is required. The author examines bootlegging and analyzes the theories upon which legal actions have been based. In concluding that the current remedies are inadequate, the author proposes legislative solutions that will result in effectively protecting the rights of artists and licensed …
Voir Dire: Is There A Consitutional Right Of Access, Kathleen A. Kelly
Voir Dire: Is There A Consitutional Right Of Access, Kathleen A. Kelly
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The United States Supreme Court has ruled upon the public's constitutional right to attend criminal trials in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, and the right to attend preliminary hearings in Gannett Co. v. DePasquale. This note analyzes whether there is a constitutional right of access to voir dire. The note explores the distinction between trial and pretrial events and the historical practice and structural purpose of voir dire. The author suggests that voir dire be considered under the Gannett analysis. Accordingly, the author concludes that there is no constitutionally guaranteed right to attend voir dire.
Constitutional Limitations On Libel Actions: A Bibliography Of New York Times V. Sullivan And Its Progeny, 1964-1984, Frank G. Houdek
Constitutional Limitations On Libel Actions: A Bibliography Of New York Times V. Sullivan And Its Progeny, 1964-1984, Frank G. Houdek
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
No abstract provided.
The Selig Case And Amortization Of Player Contracts: Baseball Continues Its Winning Ways, S. Barksdale Penick
The Selig Case And Amortization Of Player Contracts: Baseball Continues Its Winning Ways, S. Barksdale Penick
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Over the years professional sports teams have enjoyed special treatment under the law. In the mid-1970's, however, there was a general tightening of the tax treatment of sports teams. This note examines the Tax Reform Act of 1976 and recent court decisions which have tried to determine the proper allocation of cost to player contracts purchased with a sports franchise. Although no accurate method of allocating cost has yet been found, the author concludes that the court in Selig v. United States went too far in permitting significant amortization deductions for owners of baseball teams and that this extreme extension …
Copyright - Copyright Act Of 1976 - Operating System Computer Programs Expressed In Object Code And Stored On Rom Are Copyrightable, Janet E. Fisher
Copyright - Copyright Act Of 1976 - Operating System Computer Programs Expressed In Object Code And Stored On Rom Are Copyrightable, Janet E. Fisher
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Disabled Student Athlete: Gaining A Place On The Playing Field, Kathleen De Santis
The Disabled Student Athlete: Gaining A Place On The Playing Field, Kathleen De Santis
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Historically, students with physical or mental impairments were barred from participating on school sports teams because school officials feared that these disabled students faced a greater risk of serious injury than their non-handicapped peers. The author examines recent student challenges to athletic disqualification decisions and concludes that the equal protection clause and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act provide effective means for combatting handicap discrimination in school athletics.
Protecting And Regulating Commercial Speech: Consumers Confront The First Amendment, Barbara Burnett
Protecting And Regulating Commercial Speech: Consumers Confront The First Amendment, Barbara Burnett
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Although courts have determined the necessity of regulating commercial speech, first amendment considerations also require commercial speech be accorded a certain amount of protection from regulation. Preventing false and deceptive advertising is the express goal of such regulation. The author suggests a functional analysis approach be applied to commercial speech to determine the extent of first amendment protection due. Functional analysis would break down commercial messages into those that are factually verifiable and those that are subjective. The author suggests this approach would be the first step to providing a standard by which messages may be evaluated for constitutional protection.
The Reexamination Of Cable Television's Compulsory Licensing Royalty Rates: The Copyright Royalty Tribunal And The Marketplace, Dale N. Hatfield, Robert Alan Garrett
The Reexamination Of Cable Television's Compulsory Licensing Royalty Rates: The Copyright Royalty Tribunal And The Marketplace, Dale N. Hatfield, Robert Alan Garrett
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 1976 imposed on cable operators. The authors assert that changing conditions in the cable industry have eliminated the original need for a strict royalty schedule, and that the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, in its discretion, should adopt new rates which reflect those reasonably charged in the marketplace. The authors additionally argue that Congress itself should use this marketplace approach to amend the statutory rates applied to distant signal programming retransmitted by cable.
What's Entertainment - An Inquiry Into The Educational And Amusing Aspects Of Educational Play Parks, Jennifer J. Martin
What's Entertainment - An Inquiry Into The Educational And Amusing Aspects Of Educational Play Parks, Jennifer J. Martin
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
An innovative type of amusement park offering a blend of education and entertainment is emerging throughout the country. The author discusses whether these educational play parks should be considered as educational facilities or amusement parks for state and local amusement tax purposes. The focus of the discussion is the examination of the terms "education" and "amusement." The author analyzes the impact of the ruling in Big Mama Rag, Inc. v. United States, and the issues in the dispute between the first educational play park, Sesame Place, and the township of Middleton.
Subliminal Projection: History And Analysis, Thomas Albert Bliss
Subliminal Projection: History And Analysis, Thomas Albert Bliss
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
This article examines subliminal projection, the process whereby information is transmitted to one's subconscious without one's knowledge, as it applies to audio-visual media. The author outlines the psychological basis for the process, then describes the various techniques that have been devised for exploiting the process. A detailed history of experimental and nonexperimental applications is followed by a discussion of the responses by lawmaking, regulatory and programming bodies to those applications and the process in general. The author argues that, lacking statutory bases for prevention of the use of subliminal projection, the most appropriate tort theory on which to base an …
Journalists' Interference With Police: The First Amendment, Access To News And Official Discretion, Kent R. Middleton
Journalists' Interference With Police: The First Amendment, Access To News And Official Discretion, Kent R. Middleton
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
A journalist at a news scene, such as the site of a car accident with trapped victims, may be denied access by police officer who believes the journalist's presence will hinder his performance. In such situations, the journalist's interest in access to obtain news and the officer's interest in performing official duties are in conflict. This conflict is analyzed in the author's discussion of New Jersey v. Lashinsky where a news photographer refused to leave a news scene at an officer's request and was prosecuted and convicted for interference. The author argues that the New Jersey Supreme Court improperly upheld …
Copyright Protection For Video Games, Computer Programs And Other Cybernetic Works, Marilyn A. Brody
Copyright Protection For Video Games, Computer Programs And Other Cybernetic Works, Marilyn A. Brody
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Computer software is an increasingly important form of intellectual property. Continued investment and development depends on patent or copyright protection, but as Apple v. Franklin demonstrates, courts disagree as to the appropriateness of such protection. Consistent application of the law based on a clear understanding of the underlying technologies is essential. Against this background, and using concepts from cybernetics and information theory, a specialized form of copyright is suggested as the appropriate protection mechanism.
Video Game Regulation And The Courts, Linda Sue Dobb
Video Game Regulation And The Courts, Linda Sue Dobb
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Local governments have traditionally used anti-gambling, licensing and curfew statutes to control the presence of pinball machines, pool halls and bowling alleys within their communities. This note analyzes the recent use of similar statutes to limit the number of video games, the location of video arcades and the ownership of amusement centers. It concentrates on the constitutional challenges by owners of video devices to anti-gambling, licensing and curfew statutes as applied to these games. The rights of property owners, youths and games players of all ages are examined as courts decide whether "Pac-Man," 'Space Invaders" and "Asteroids" are entitled to …
Metromedia V. San Diego Iii: Content Regulation, Commercial Speech, And The California Supreme Court's Recent Billboard Decision, Steven Saxton
Metromedia V. San Diego Iii: Content Regulation, Commercial Speech, And The California Supreme Court's Recent Billboard Decision, Steven Saxton
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In Metromedia v. San Diego III, the California Supreme Court laid to rest San Diego's billboard ordinance, rejecting guidelines set forth by the United States Supreme Court for curing the ordinance's constitutional defects. This note examines the reasons for the California court's decision. The author analyzes the various uses of "content neutrality" in first amendment adjudication, and traces the influence of content neutrality principles on the development of commercial speech doctrine. In turn,this analysis is applied to the Metromedia cases to explain the inconsistencies among them.
Trade Screening Laws: A Survey And Analysis, Thomas A. Bartasi
Trade Screening Laws: A Survey And Analysis, Thomas A. Bartasi
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
For years, movie distributors have used "blind bidding," a licensing method under which an exhibitor bid and negotiated sight unseen, for the right to exhibit a motion picture. This article presents a comprehensive survey of state statutes, known as "trade screening laws," which have attempted to make the licensing process more open and fair. By examining the restrictions and prohibitions contained in the various statutes, this survey is directed at assisting legislators who seek to enact or revise trade screening laws.
Simon Geller And The Comparative Renewal Process: What's Good For Gloucester, Frances C. Lindemann
Simon Geller And The Comparative Renewal Process: What's Good For Gloucester, Frances C. Lindemann
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) employs a "comparative renewal process" in determining which of two mutually exclusive applicants should be granted a broadcasting license. This note examines the controversial method used in awarding licenses by focusing on the case of Simon Geller, the first instance in which the FCC failed to renew an existing broadcasting license when challenged by a new applicant. It considers the factors weighed in the comparative renewal process, questions whether they were accurately applied in the Geller case, and discusses whether the comparative renewal process really protects the "public interest."
What Does Negligence Mean In Defamation Cases, Marc A. Franklin
What Does Negligence Mean In Defamation Cases, Marc A. Franklin
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Ten years have passed since the Supreme Court decided Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. and introduced "fault" analysis into defamation cases. The author examines how the courts have approached the determination of a defendant's fault in the years since Gertz. He further reviews recent statistical data and insurance trends, and analyzes the impact that the emergent negligence standard has had on libel litigation.
The Athlete As Public Figure In Light Of Gertz V. Robert Welch, Inc., Or Torts In Sports: The Role Of The Courts, Richard M. Wise
The Athlete As Public Figure In Light Of Gertz V. Robert Welch, Inc., Or Torts In Sports: The Role Of The Courts, Richard M. Wise
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Recognizing the need for a systematic treatment of the public figure doctrine in relation to professional athletes, this article examines the tension between first amendment rights of free speech and the athlete's right to privacy. The author presents a brief history on the law of defamation and analyzes the differences between limited and general public figures. Supporting a flexible framework of analysis, he proposes close scrutiny of the mitigating factors of time and audience. Only then, he concludes, will the courts be able to protect both the constitutional guarantees of free speech and the athlete's personal interest in his reputation.
Spotlight On The Jury: Trial Publicity And Juror Privacy, Susan L. Greenberg
Spotlight On The Jury: Trial Publicity And Juror Privacy, Susan L. Greenberg
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The note examines the current law regarding media coverage of jury trials and the effect of such publicity on the privacy rights of jurors. The author proposes that the competing rights of jurors and the media be balanced in order that jurors' privacy rights may be protected without excluding the media from the courtroom.