Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1409)
- Universitas Indonesia (872)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (718)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (507)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (480)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (286)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (265)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (230)
- Duke Law (215)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (170)
- Fordham Law School (148)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (140)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (116)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (840)
- Supreme Court (689)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (416)
- Constitution (381)
-
- Judges (358)
- Judicial review (279)
- Jurisdiction (262)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (255)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (205)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Due process (185)
- Jurisprudence (164)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (134)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (128)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (737)
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (582)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
-
- Touro Law Review (453)
- Articles (425)
- Faculty Publications (337)
- University of Richmond Law Review (302)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (223)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (149)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- Scholarly Works (135)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- Court Briefs (119)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 12061 - 12090 of 12608
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Judge Advocate General's Department Of The Army, Edgar H. Snodgrass
The Judge Advocate General's Department Of The Army, Edgar H. Snodgrass
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Johnson Amendment To The Judicial Code, Edwin C. Goddard
The Johnson Amendment To The Judicial Code, Edwin C. Goddard
Michigan Law Review
The so-called Johnson bill amending the Judicial Code was passed by Congress and signed by the President on May 14, 1934. The bill was the result of long agitation against the alleged pernicious interference by United States District Courts with rate regulations of the state utility commissions and the state courts. It was charged that the removal of cases from state to federal tribunals was burdening the District Courts and, what was far more serious, was favoring the public utilities and preventing their proper state regulation by submitting controversies to judges having life tenure and who were out of touch …
Bankruptcy-Debtor Proceedings-Power Of Court To Enjoin State Court Actions
Bankruptcy-Debtor Proceedings-Power Of Court To Enjoin State Court Actions
Michigan Law Review
A debtor proceeding was initiated in a Florida federal court and an ancillary proceeding was begun in a New York federal court. The latter court enjoined petitioner, who had obtained a tort judgment against the debtor in a New York state court, which judgment had been affirmed by the Appellate Division, from arguing the case as appellee in the New York Court of Appeals and from continuing to prosecute an action commenced by him (petitioner) against the sureties on an appeal bond filed by the debtor pending the appeal to the Appellate Division. Shares of stock had been pledged by …
Evidence - Admissibility Of Blood-Group Test
Evidence - Admissibility Of Blood-Group Test
Michigan Law Review
The old axiom, "blood will tell," has been given a new lease on life by the work of biochemists and hereditists in the last thirty years. At the beginning of the twentieth century a scientist, Karl Landsteiner, working on the means to make blood transfusions safe, discovered that the New Testament saying, the Almighty "hath made of one blood all nations of men," is not true. He found that human blood is divided into four groups, characterized by the possession or non-possession of certain substances in the serum and the corpuscles of the blood. If one puts a little blood …
Mortgagee Beneficiaries In The Federal Courts, Elvin E. Overton
Mortgagee Beneficiaries In The Federal Courts, Elvin E. Overton
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Challenge To The Lawyers Of The State, Earl King
A Challenge To The Lawyers Of The State, Earl King
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall, William T. Frierson
Chief Justice John Marshall, William T. Frierson
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tax Limitations Of Counties And Municipalities, M. P. O'Connor
Tax Limitations Of Counties And Municipalities, M. P. O'Connor
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Theory Of The Case, Bernard C. Gavit
Procedural Simplification, Arthur Crownover Jr.
Procedural Simplification, Arthur Crownover Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution Of The United States, Robert M. Jones
The Constitution Of The United States, Robert M. Jones
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tax Delinquency In Tennessee - Legislative Aspects, Charles P. White
Tax Delinquency In Tennessee - Legislative Aspects, Charles P. White
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Verdict--Juror's Assent--What Constitutes, Paul D. Farr
Verdict--Juror's Assent--What Constitutes, Paul D. Farr
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Practice And Procedure - Power Of The Court To Increase Inadequate Verdict
Practice And Procedure - Power Of The Court To Increase Inadequate Verdict
Michigan Law Review
With the development of the remittitur in the case of excessive verdicts, one would naturally expect the development of an analogous device for cases wherein the verdicts are inadequate. When the plaintiff moves for a new trial because of an inadequate verdict, a denial of the motion on the condition that the defendant agree to a certain increase in the verdict is perfectly analogous to the remittitur in form. But this device has not received the same wide acceptance as its counterpart. In cases in which the plaintiff has appealed this device has been condemned, while it has been approved …
Pleading-Appeal And Error Reversal Because Of Erroneous Overruling Of Demurrer
Pleading-Appeal And Error Reversal Because Of Erroneous Overruling Of Demurrer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice -Appeal And Error - Review Of Denial Of Motion For New Trial
Federal Practice -Appeal And Error - Review Of Denial Of Motion For New Trial
Michigan Law Review
The federal appellate courts have, in a great many decisions, refused to review the denial of a motion for a new trial made in a lower federal court. The very recent case of Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. once again presents the problem, and Justice Brandeis, writing the majority opinion, follows the prior holdings. In this very excellent opinion the learned Justice presents the reasons for the result generally reached, and enumerates some of the exceptions in a manner which should tend to clarify much of the doubt which has existed in this field of appellate jurisdiction.
Prosecution Appeals In West Virginia, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Prosecution Appeals In West Virginia, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Dartmouth College Case -- Then And Now, Hugh Evander Willis
The Dartmouth College Case -- Then And Now, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. United States Supreme Court Service, Ralph F. Fuchs
Book Review. United States Supreme Court Service, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice - Appeal And Error - Necessity For Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law In Interlocutory Proceedings
Michigan Law Review
The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin issued a temporary order reducing telephone rates, setting forth its reasons and the facts in an elaborate opinion. A temporary restraining order was issued by a federal district court, which was followed by an application for an interlocutory injunction. A hearing on this application was held before three judges who granted an injunction on the same day upon the giving of a bond. Meanwhile the temporary restraining order continued in force. No opinion was rendered other than a general statement in the decree that the Commission's order "would result in the confiscation of the …
Constitutional Law--- Status Of Courts Of District Of Columbia
Constitutional Law--- Status Of Courts Of District Of Columbia
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, justices of District of Columbia courts, protested the application by the Comptroller-General of an Act of Congress reducing their salaries, alleging that they felt it their duty to have the status of these courts defined. The majority of the Court, answering questions certified by the Court of Claims; held that section l of Article III of the federal constitution applied to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia and to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, and forbade a reduction of the compensation of the justices thereof during their continuance in office, on the theory …