Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1409)
- Universitas Indonesia (872)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (718)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (507)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (480)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (286)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (265)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (230)
- Duke Law (215)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (170)
- Fordham Law School (148)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (140)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (116)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (840)
- Supreme Court (689)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (416)
- Constitution (381)
-
- Judges (358)
- Judicial review (279)
- Jurisdiction (262)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (255)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (205)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Due process (185)
- Jurisprudence (164)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (134)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (128)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (737)
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (582)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
-
- Touro Law Review (453)
- Articles (425)
- Faculty Publications (337)
- University of Richmond Law Review (302)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (223)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (149)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- Scholarly Works (135)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- Court Briefs (119)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11821 - 11850 of 12608
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Proceedings Of The Law Institute On The Economic Status Of The Legal Profession
Proceedings Of The Law Institute On The Economic Status Of The Legal Profession
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Students Section - Notes And Recent Cases
Legal Economics And The Press, Edward J. Meeman
Legal Economics And The Press, Edward J. Meeman
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Procedure By Rules Of Court In West Virginia, Harry Scherr Jr.
Regulating Procedure By Rules Of Court In West Virginia, Harry Scherr Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contempt--Power Of Chancery To Punish, W. H. S.
Contempt--Power Of Chancery To Punish, W. H. S.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appeal And Error - Order Granting A New Trial As An Appealable Order, Michigan Law Review
Appeal And Error - Order Granting A New Trial As An Appealable Order, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict was returned plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial claiming misconduct on the part of the jury. The trial court granted the motion and the defendant appealed. Held, the granting of a motion for a new trial is not a final order and, therefore, not subject to review, except in cases where it clearly appears from the record that the trial court has abused its discretion in granting the motion. Petro v. Donner, 137 Ohio St. 168, 28 N. E. …
Some Public Reactions To Procedural Methods, Michael L. Fansler
Some Public Reactions To Procedural Methods, Michael L. Fansler
Indiana Law Journal
An address delivered by Judge Michael L. Fansler of the Indiana Supreme Court at the mid-winter meeting of the Indiana State Bar Association, January 25, 1941.
Appeal And Error - Bad Faith Of Counsel As A Basis For Granting A New Trial Where Fact That Defendant Was Insured Was Brought To Attention Of Jury, Raymond H. Rapaport
Appeal And Error - Bad Faith Of Counsel As A Basis For Granting A New Trial Where Fact That Defendant Was Insured Was Brought To Attention Of Jury, Raymond H. Rapaport
Michigan Law Review
It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the defendant is covered by indemnity insurance. The reasons for the rule are that the matter of insurance is irrelevant, and that the exposition of its existence is prejudicial. The jury is likely to grant more and larger verdicts for the plaintiff when it is known that an insurance company, rather than the individual defendant being tried, will have to pay the judgment. However, the fact that the defendant is insured reaches the jury in a multitude of ways. While direct evidence of …
Jurisdiction Of Employee Suits Under The Fair Labor Standards Act, George W. Crockett Jr.
Jurisdiction Of Employee Suits Under The Fair Labor Standards Act, George W. Crockett Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The statutory authority for employee suits under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is found in section 16(b). Suits under this section have been instituted in both state and federal courts. In practically every case the defendant has, by a motion to dismiss, challenged the jurisdiction of the court. The usual ground for the challenge in the state courts is that such suits seek to recover penalties incurred under a statute of the United States, and are, therefore, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States. The jurisdiction of the federal district courts is generally …
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Walter Muller
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Walter Muller
Michigan Law Review
Robbery of a Federal Reserve Bank and jeopardizing lives by the use of dangerous weapons were the charges brought against defendant in a federal district court. Ten months after being taken into custody, he was finally brought to trial. On the latter date, for the first time, the defendant expressed to the court a desire to engage different counsel because of recent difficulties he had had with his original choice. The defendant was the complaining petitioner in a pending disbarment proceeding against his attorney. But the record did not show that the defendant disclosed the nature of those differences to …
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles And Politics, John P. Frank
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles And Politics, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Iii, John P. Frank
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Iii, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Justice Appointments: Ii, John P. Frank
Supreme Court Justice Appointments: Ii, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Advent Of The Administrative Process And Its Future, Thomas Frank Konop
The Advent Of The Administrative Process And Its Future, Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
Every government exercises three governmental powers E that are necessary for its existence. They are Taxation, Police Power, and the Power of Eminent Domain. Every government, however crude, or whatever we may call it, must have the power first to make the law, which is called the legislative power; second, it must have the power to declare what the law is, which is the judicial power; and third, it must have the power to enforce the law and this is called the executive power.
In the very early governments such as the government of the clan or tribe, these three …
Federal Courts - Jurisdiction Over Violations Of Civil Liberties By State Governments And By Private Individuals, Eugene Gressman
Federal Courts - Jurisdiction Over Violations Of Civil Liberties By State Governments And By Private Individuals, Eugene Gressman
Michigan Law Review
The long-term security of civil liberties in the United States must in the end depend upon the spirit and attitude of the public. Many violations of these rights never reach the stage of justiciable issues. But even when they do, public sentiment is often reflected in the courts. Especially is this true in the state courts, which are often too near local prejudices and entrenched mores to withstand their effect. This situation was recognized as long ago as the Reconstruction Era, when the various civil rights acts provided for federal protection of civil liberties. Apparently it was felt that from …
The Premises Of The Judgment As Res Judicata In Continental And Anglo-American Law, Robert Wyness Millar
The Premises Of The Judgment As Res Judicata In Continental And Anglo-American Law, Robert Wyness Millar
Michigan Law Review
That every judicial judgment, whatever its character, consists of premises and conclusion is a fact sufficiently obvious. In our system, especially, expression of the premises must very often be sought outside the actual judgment-order and collected from other parts of the judicial record or even from evidence aliunde of what took place at the hearing. But the legal nature of the relation between premises and conclusion is independent of the particular structure of the record and the mode of ascertaining what those premises were. Given satisfaction of the requirements of the law with respect to identity of parties, it is …
Common Mistakes In Appellate Procedure, A. J. Stevenson
Common Mistakes In Appellate Procedure, A. J. Stevenson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The New Supreme Court Rules, Curtis G. Shake
The New Supreme Court Rules, Curtis G. Shake
Indiana Law Journal
An address delivered by Judge Curtis G. Shake of the Indiana Supreme Court at the Fort Wayne Law Institute, August 22, 1940.
Summary Judgment Procedure For Tennessee, Charles S. Coffey
Summary Judgment Procedure For Tennessee, Charles S. Coffey
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Modern Movement For Higher Standards Of Admission To The Bar, W. Raymond Blackard
The Modern Movement For Higher Standards Of Admission To The Bar, W. Raymond Blackard
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tennessee Procedure Should Be Studied: A Modest Proposal, Walter P. Armstrong
Tennessee Procedure Should Be Studied: A Modest Proposal, Walter P. Armstrong
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unfair Competition - Past And Present Trends, Robert E. Sadtler
Unfair Competition - Past And Present Trends, Robert E. Sadtler
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Electricity As A Subject Of Larceny In Tennessee, Seymour Samuels Jr.
Electricity As A Subject Of Larceny In Tennessee, Seymour Samuels Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Psychopathic Proceeding - Due Process And Jury Trial, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Psychopathic Proceeding - Due Process And Jury Trial, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Proceedings were brought against appellant under a Minnesota statute providing for commitment of psychopathic persons who showed habitual sexual misconduct. Appellant appealed to the state supreme court for a writ of prohibition, claiming denial of due process. Appellant's contentions were overruled and he appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Held, the statute did not deny due process. Minnesota ex rel. Pearson v. Probate Court, (U.S. 1940) 60 S. Ct. 523.
Search And Seizure Problems?, E. C. Arnold