Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1407)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (715)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (495)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (472)
- Universitas Indonesia (471)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (269)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (264)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (229)
- Duke Law (212)
- American University Washington College of Law (201)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (171)
- Fordham Law School (138)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (136)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (115)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (854)
- Supreme Court (687)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (414)
- Constitution (380)
-
- Judges (362)
- Judicial review (278)
- Jurisdiction (263)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (253)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (203)
- Constitutional Law (195)
- Due process (184)
- Jurisprudence (167)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- First Amendment (135)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (129)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (126)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (573)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
- Touro Law Review (453)
-
- Articles (418)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (336)
- Faculty Publications (333)
- University of Richmond Law Review (292)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (220)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (147)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- Scholarly Works (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- Court Briefs (103)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (97)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 11821 - 11850 of 12107
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ruling On Demurrer To Petition For Annulment Of Marriage, Theophilus J. Moll
Ruling On Demurrer To Petition For Annulment Of Marriage, Theophilus J. Moll
Indiana Law Journal
This is a ruling on demurrer by Judge Moll in In Re Marriage of Henry R. Steinkuhler and Elizabeth P. Bowman, Superior CT. No. 35298. It gives a judicial pronouncement in a most unusual legal action
Does "Legislative Review" By Courts In Appeals From Public Utility Commissions Constitute Due Process Of Law?, Maurice H. Merrill
Does "Legislative Review" By Courts In Appeals From Public Utility Commissions Constitute Due Process Of Law?, Maurice H. Merrill
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
Washington Law Review
With regard to the constitutionality of the proposal, the first question that occurs to every lawyer is whether the legislature may delegate the rule-making power to the courts. It seems strange that, in view of the history of English and American procedural law, this question should occur to anyone as presenting a serious objection, but the reason is, of course, that we have got so far away from the original method of regulating court procedure that our inclination is to believe that legislative codes are the only way in which court procedure can be prescribed. As a matter of fact, …
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
The Court Of Claims, J. H. Toelle
The Court Of Claims, J. H. Toelle
Michigan Law Review
The Court of Claims was established by Act of Congress in 1855. The original Act provided that at the commencement of each session of Congress, and at the commencement of each month during the session, the Court should report the cases upon which they should have finally acted, stating in each the material facts which they found established by the evidence, with their opinion in the case, and the. reasons upon which such opinion was founded, and the opinion of any judge who should dissent from the majority. It also directed the Court to prepare a bill or bills in …
Practice In Justice's Court Joining Or Splitting Causes Of Action, G. D. H.
Practice In Justice's Court Joining Or Splitting Causes Of Action, G. D. H.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
The Technique Of Judicial Appointment, Harold J. Laski
The Technique Of Judicial Appointment, Harold J. Laski
Michigan Law Review
It is difficult to overestimate the significance of the judiciary in the modern state. The work of the executive has become so vast, the powers delegated to it by the legislature are so wide, that judges are, perhaps more than at any previous time, the real safeguard of personal liberty. It is only necessary to recall cases like Coppage v. Kansas, or R. v. Halliday, to realize how nearly judicial activity goes to the very heart of freedom. That is, of course, even more the case when, as with America, the constitution of the state is written, and …
The Uniformity Of The Maritime Law, George L. Canfield
The Uniformity Of The Maritime Law, George L. Canfield
Michigan Law Review
In 1871, Richard Henry Dana commenced a masterly article on the "History of Admiralty Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States,'' by writing, "After seventy yea.rs of baffling winds and cross currents in the region of admiralty jurisdiction, the Supreme Court of the United States has sailed out into deep water." In 1924, Charles Merrill Hough concludes his delightful "Admiralty Jurisdiction-of Late Years," with the statement, "The years since 1906 have not increased the certainty of maritime law, and they have impaired the tradition of enforceable customs of the sea." And others writing in current legal periodicals have …
The Validity Of The Act Of 1925 Calling A Constitutional Convention In Tennessee, O. T. Tindell
The Validity Of The Act Of 1925 Calling A Constitutional Convention In Tennessee, O. T. Tindell
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Progress In Legal Education, Alfred Z. Reed
Recent Progress In Legal Education, Alfred Z. Reed
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
Washington Law Review
During these times of renewed interest in the defects in our judicial procedure, probably the most sweeping and far-reaching reform proposed is to give the rule-making power to our courts. The exact form of the proposal differs with the conditions in various jurisdictions, but the proposed acts generally provide that the highest appellate court of the jurisdiction shall regulate and prescribe, by rule, the forms for and the kind and character of the entire pleading, practice and procedure to be used in all suits, actions, appeals and proceedings of whatever nature in any of the courts of the state, superseding …
Judicial Settlement And The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Amos S. Hershey
Judicial Settlement And The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Amos S. Hershey
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Early Tennessee Surveys And Maps, F. Giddings, M. D. Arnold Jr.
Early Tennessee Surveys And Maps, F. Giddings, M. D. Arnold Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Technical Rules Of Evidence, Irving Lehman
Burden Of Proof Of Due Course Holding Under Negotiable Instruments Law, Walter E. Treanor
Burden Of Proof Of Due Course Holding Under Negotiable Instruments Law, Walter E. Treanor
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Permanent International Court Of Criminal Justice, By M. Caloyanni, James J. Robinson
Permanent International Court Of Criminal Justice, By M. Caloyanni, James J. Robinson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Probationary Powers, Eugene B. Cochran
Federal Probationary Powers, Eugene B. Cochran
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congress And The Supreme Court (Continued), Thomas Frank Konop
Congress And The Supreme Court (Continued), Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself.
Congress And The Supreme Court, Thomas Frank Konop
Congress And The Supreme Court, Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself.
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Compulsory Arbitration Under Kansas Industrial Relations Act
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Compulsory Arbitration Under Kansas Industrial Relations Act
Michigan Law Review
Another interesting chapter has been written in the legal history of the Kansas Court of Industrial Relations, that most interesting attempt to substitute judicial methods for the present condition of strife in the field of industrial dispute, and to recognize the rights of the public as an interested third party in such disputes. In Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, U. S. Sup. Ct., Oct. Term, 1924, Nos. 207 and 299, 45 S. Ct. Rep. 441, the Supreme Court of the United States has decided that the Industrial Relations Act, c. 29, LAWS 1920 (KANSAS), SPECIAL SESSION, …
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
"The plaintiff corporation was incorporated in Russia under the Imperial government. Prior to the Russian Revolution it had deposited certain securities and moneys with the defendant, as trustee, as required by the New York statutes, for the protection of policy-holders and creditors. In this suit to compel the return of the funds the defendant claimed that the plaintiff corporation was no longer in existence because of the Russian Soviet decrees.... Held, that although the court cannot recognize the legal validity of the decrees of the Soviet government, the facts of the situation are such that justice and reason require …
Cooperation Between The Bar And The Public In Improving The Administration Of Justice, Edson R. Sunderland
Cooperation Between The Bar And The Public In Improving The Administration Of Justice, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
Professor Sunderland compares public participation in the legal systems of the United States and Great Britain. "There must be a partnership between the profession and the laity for improving the administration of justice. Law must become a matter of public concern, and not treated as a mere perquisite of a professional class."