Digital Commons Network^™

The Grand Jury--Prosecutorial Abuse Of The Indictment Process, 65 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 157 (1974), Robert G. Johnston

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judicial Activity And Public Attitude: A Quantitative Study Of Selective Service Sentencing In The Vietnam War Period, Dianne Bennett Graebner

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Jury Experiment Reanalyzed, Shari Seidman Diamond

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Researchers in the behavioral sciences have watched with some pride as the courts have given increased attention to social science studies. Judicial interest in empirical studies is a desirable development but one not quite free of danger. The courts are not yet fully accustomed to dealing critically with such evidence. The United States Supreme Court ruled recently, in Colgrove v. Battin, that six-member juries in civil cases meet the seventh amendment requirement of trial by jury. This decision was not surprising in light of Williams v. Florida, in which the Court ruled that six jurors were sufficient to …

The Politics Of Federal Judicial Administration, Paul D. Carrington

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Politics of Federal Judicial Administration by Peter Graham Fish

State Judicial Financing: Preliminaries, Progress, Provisions, And Prognosis, James A. Gazell

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Prior Inconsistent Statements: Presently Inconsistent Doctrine, Mark Reutlinger

Faculty Articles

The common law has come a long way since Sir Walter Raleigh was convicted of treason on the basis of accusations contained in unproduced letters and the hearsay declarations of unproduced witnesses. However, despite the painstaking development and innumerable formulations and reformulations of the hearsay rule over the past several centuries, there are areas of that body of law which are as yet unsettled and the subject of heated controversy. One such area is that of prior inconsistent statements of witnesses, the controversy over which has continued over the years and has surfaced once again with promulgation of the new …

Book Review. A Special Kind Of Justice, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Unification, Funding, Discipline And Administration: Cornerstones For A New Judicial Article, Luvern V. Rieke

Washington Law Review

Need for adjustments in the structure and operation of the judiciary is occasioned by the same factors that require modification of other institutions and is more accurately described as a continuing process than as a response to a specific crisis. In recent years, however, demands upon existing judicial resources have burgeoned, and it has been said that the "old ways of doing things are clearly inadequate to meet the burdens imposed on our courts by the 'law explosion' of the mid-20th century." The legitimacy of these demands already has been recognized in Washington. Partial reform of the courts of limited …

The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure: State Court Evasion Of The Burger Court, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Proposed Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Paul F. Rothstein

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the Supreme Court's rules are now pending in the House of Representatives. From the point of view of a specialist in the law of evidence, Professor Rothstein analyzes the differences between the Supreme Court's proposals and the House amendments and suggests solutions to these conflicts.

Disqualifications For Interest Of Lower Federal Court Judges: 28 U.S.C. § 455, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Disqualification of a judge occurs when he is ineligible by law to sit in a particular case. At the Supreme Court level, disqualification is a personal decision of the individual justice, who seldom records the reasons for his decision. Thus, there is little material on the Court's disqualification practices that can be subjected to legal analysis. However, substantial case law on disqualification has developed in the lower federal courts, where the decision of a trial judge to sit or step down in a case may appear in the trial record and is subject to review by a court of appeals. …

Victimless Crimes: A Proposal To Free The Courts, Robert C. Boruchowitz

Faculty Articles

Victimless "crimes"—acts that are presently outside the law but which have no readily identifiable victim—account for almost half of the cases handled by United States courts. They include behavior which may reflect illness and which requires medical and therapeutic attention (such as drunkenness), as well as behavior condemned as varying from moral or social standards and leading to harmful behavior (such as vagrancy and curfew violations). If the burden of regulating this type of behavior were removed from the criminal justice system, perhaps one half of the courts' current case load could be eliminated. Furthermore, persons caught in deviant conduct …

Court Reform In England, Kazimierz Grzybowski

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Collateral Challenges To Criminal Convictions, Keith G. Meyer, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

The Kansas Defender Project is a clinical program sponsored by the University of Kansas School of Law. The Project provides student legal services to indigent prison inmates at the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth and the Kansas State Penitentiary at Lansing, Kansas. Launched in 1965 through the efforts of Paul E. Wilson, Kane Professor of Law, the Project has since been a model for similar clinical undertakings at law schools across the country.

Judicial Administration: The Williamsburg Consensus - Some Errors And Omissions, James G. France

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Friesen, Gallas & Gallas: Managing The Courts, William A. Mcrae Jr.

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Managing the Courts by Ernest C. Friesen, Edward C. Gallas, and Nesta M. Gallas

National Institute Of Justice--A Proposal, Bert H. Early

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Volume 39 (1971-1972)

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflection On The Present Footing Of Judicial Administration, Thomas C. Clark

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Our Options Are Limited, Warren E. Burger

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Fifty-One Chief Justices, William F. Swindler

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Grand Jury: Bulwark Of Prosecutorial Immunity?, Michael K. Williams

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Courts--Juveniles In Delinquency Proceedings Are Not Constitutionally Entitled To The Right Of Trial By Jury--Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

At a hearing in the juvenile court of Philadelphia in October 1968, Joseph McKeiver was declared a "delinquent child" and placed on probation by a juvenile court judge who determined that McKeiver had violated a Pennsylvania law. The juvenile court petition charged McKeiver, then sixteen years old, with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods as the result of an incident in which McKeiver and twenty or thirty other youths took twenty-five cents from three teenagers. Despite the fact that the evidence against McKeiver consisted primarily of the weak and inconsistent testimony of two of the victims, the juvenile court judge, …

Devising Procedures That Are Civil To Promote Justice That Is Civilized, Maurice Rosenberg

Michigan Law Review

In a democracy, process is king to a very large extent, and this is especially so in the judicial branch. Even though substantive laws command attention, procedural rules ensure respect. Why is this true? One powerful reason is that when people end up in court, their case typically is not a matter of right against wrong, but of right against right. Decent process makes the painful task of deciding which party will prevail bearable and helps make the decision itself acceptable.

To put my position plainly, I believe that the road to court-made justice is paved with good procedures. Later …

Juvenile Courts: Kentucky Law In Need Of Revision, Jack M. Smith Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Plea Bargaining: A Model Court Rule, Kenneth A. Kraus

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

It is not the purpose of this note to discuss the justification for the plea bargaining process, for it is clear that this system will of necessity be continued in the foreseeable future. Instead, this analysis is designed first to present the functional role, constitutional status and existing abuses in the plea bargaining process, and then to discuss the goals and the proposed standards relevant to reform of the present plea bargaining procedures. The culmination of this analysis is the proposed Model Court Rule for Plea Agreements in part III.

Title I - Special Grand Jury, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Title I establishes special grand juries to sit in major population areas and other areas designated by the Attorney General. These grand juries are protected from arbitrary dismissal by the district court before completion of their work. They can sit for extended periods (a maximum of thirty-six months), and are authorized to issue reports concerning (a) noncriminal misconduct of appointed government officials or employees involving organized criminal activity; and (b) organized crime conditions within the district. When reports are issued concerning governmental misconduct, individuals named are given notice, afforded the opportunity to present evidence, file an answer, and obtain judicial …

Toward Judicial Reform, Edward J. Gurney

University of Richmond Law Review

President Nixon has several times in the recent past publicly recognized a growing national attitude-the American people, as a class, are losing confidence in the ability of their governments to govern. And this unfortunate lack, or at least diminution of confidence, is nowhere more evident than in the way the average citizen views the courts of this country.

American Bar Association Project On Minimum Standards For Criminal Justice: Standards Relating To Trial By Jury (Approved Draft), Melvin M. Belli

Michigan Law Review

A Review of American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice: Standards Relating to Trial by Jury (Approved Draft). Recommended by the Advisory Committee on the Criminal Trial

Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, Henry Mcgee

Faculty Articles

Professor McGee reviews Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, by Kenneth Culp Davis. Davis, suggesting both that we are a government of men as much as of laws and that discretion begins where law ends, sets out to determine how much unnecessary discretionary power can be contracted and how necessary discretionary power can be both confined and structured.