Digital Commons Network^™

Dissenchick V. Attorney General, Yoel Sussman, Moshe Landau, Zvi Berinson

Translated Opinions

The trial of one Rafael Blitz for murder stretched over a number of days. On the second day. a newspaper (of which the first appellant was the editor and the second appellant the responsible journalist) published a report which indicated that in answer to the charge defence counsel had pleaded not guilty before the accused could say anything. In the body of the article it was reported that before trial the accused had in fact admitted his guilt to a journalist, although it was noted that such admission not having been made in court was not binding. The appellants were …

El-Saruji V. Minister Of Religious Affairs And The Moslem Council, Moshe Landau, Moshe Silberg, Zvi Berinson

Translated Opinions

The petitioners complained generally of the alleged interference of the Minister of Religious Affairs in matters affecting the Moslem Community of Acre and more particularly of the activities and powers of the local Moslem council appointed by the Ministry.

Held. The departure from the country of Moslem leaders and officials as a result of the events of 1948 had led to a complete collapse of all Moslem institutions and their ceasing to function. In order to remedy the situation and recreate these institutions the Ministry had not proceeded under any express statutory provision but by virtue of general power vested …

Political Thickets And Crazy Quilts: Reapportionment And Equal Protection, Robert B. Mckay

Michigan Law Review

If asked to identify the two most important cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the twentieth century, informed observers would be likely to name, in whichever order, Brown v. Board of Education and Baker v. Carr.

Legislative Apportionment And Representative Government: The Meaning Of Baker V. Carr, Jo Desha Lucas

Michigan Law Review

In three recent cases the Supreme Court has reopened the question of the extent to which federal courts will review the general fairness of state schemes of legislative apportionment. It is a question on which the Court has had nothing to say for over a decade, leaving the bar to patch together the current state of the law from the outcome of cases disposed of without opinion considered against a backdrop of language used in earlier decisions.

Residency Requirements For Voting And The Tensions Of A Mobile Society, John R. Schmidhauser

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this article to determine the extent to which persons otherwise qualified to vote are disenfranchised by the complex of state residency requirements and to assess the practical and constitutional aspects of any statutory prospects for change.

The Administraton's Anti-Literacy Test Bill: Wholly Constitutional But Wholly Inadequate, William W. Van Alstyne

Michigan Law Review

The nature of American national government has undergone a profound metamorphosis, moving from the near oligarchy which characterized the system as established in 1789 to the imperfectly representative government which it is today. At the time the Constitution was ratified, all restrictions then imposed by the several states on the right to vote for state and federal electors were preserved. These various limitations on the franchise restricted the active body politic to approximately four percent of the total population. Disfranchisement applied then, as now, to those under twenty-one, to those lacking sufficient residence in a given community, to the insane, …

Judicial Reaction To Evidence Obtained By Harsh And Unusual Means, Gene Haislip

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Electronic Eavesdropping

Duquesne Law Review

Recorded bribe attempt admissible at bribery trial at which agent, to whom the attempted bribe was made, testified - Rights under fourth amendment not violated where electronic device was not planted by an unlawful physical invasion of a constitutionally protected area.

Lopez v. United States, 83 Sup. Ct. 1381 (1963).

Procedural Due Process And State University Students, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Scholarship

This examination seeks to address the problems both universities and students confront regarding the growth of student expression. It is noted that contemporary students sometimes have fewer rights than petty criminals and this article explores the common reasons behind universities’ abbreviated procedures and reconcile those reasons with students’ emerging Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Resident Aliens And Due Process: Anatomy Of A Deportation, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Limitations Upon The Territorial Reach Of Federal Process, Gerald Abraham

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Discrimination - Executive Speeches Banning Lunch Counter Sit-Ins Held To Be State Action In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, John E. Good

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Marshall Court: Nationalization Of Private Rights And Personal Liberty From The Authority Of The Commerce Clause, W. Howard Mann

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Gideon V. Wainwright: The Art Of Overruling, Jerold H. Israel

Articles

During the 1962 Term, the Supreme Court, on a single Monday, announced six decisions concerned with constitutional limitations upon state criminal procedure. The most publicized of these, though probably not the most important in terms of legal theory or practical effect, was Gideon v. Wainwright. In an era of constantly expanding federal restrictions on state criminal processes, the holding of Gideon-that an indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution has an unqualified right to the appointment of counsel-was hardly startling. And while Gideon will obviously have an important effect in the handful of states that still fail to appoint counsel …

The Administration’S Anti-Literacy Test Bill: Wholly Constitutional But Wholly Inadequate, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

This discussion of Senate Bill 2750 addresses Congress’s ability to extend voting rights without resorting to a constitutional amendment. This paper also examines the efficacy of such a law.

Constitutional Law-Relation Of State And Federal Governments-Application Of The Hatch Act To The Political Activity Of A State Official, Rolfe A. Worden S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought an action to set aside a determination of the United States Civil Service Commission that his political activities while Illinois State Director of Conservation were in violation of the Hatch Act. The district court held that such an application of the Hatch Act would infringe upon the plaintiff's vested rights, and would contravene the constitutional guarantee to the state of a republican form of government. On appeal, held, reversed. Application of the Hatch Act to state employees does not deprive them of any vested rights under the United States Constitution. Palmer v. United States Civil Sero. Comm'n …

Constitutional Separation Of Church And State: The Quest For A Coherent Position, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Obscenity: The Law, A Dissenting Voice, Erwin A. Elias

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Non-Injurious Establishments Of Religion, Terrence R. Fitzgerald

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Obscenity And The Law Of Reflection, Henry Miller

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The "Tropic Of Cancer" Litigation In Illinois, Elmer Gertz

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Position On The Control Of Obscenity, John Cornelius Levy

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Film Censorship Since Roth-Alberts, George D. Haimbaugh Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federalism And The Administration Of Criminal Justice: The Treatment Of Obscenity In The United States, Canada And Australia, Bernard Green

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Obscenity And The Japanese Constitution, Yasuo Tokikuni

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Youth-Obscenity Problem--A Proposal, H. Hamilton Rice

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Probable Cause For Search And Seizure, Paul E. Hieronymous

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Book Review, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Scholarship

This review champions the editor’s use of Mr. Justice Black’s own opinions in showcasing his emphasis of the emancipating aspects of the Constitution. This work cautions the reader to avoid relying on this compilation as an accurate depiction of the state of the law, especially considering that most of the included opinions are dissents.

Betts V. Brady Twenty Years Later: The Right To Counself And Due Process Values, Yale Kamisar

Michigan Law Review

I am quite distressed by talk that the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio "suggests by analogy" that the Court may now overrule Betts v. Brady. For whether one talks about the fourth or the sixth amendment, there is much to be said for Justice Harlan's dissenting views in Mapp. "[W]hatever configurations ... have been developed in the particularizing federal precedents" should not be "deemed a part of 'ordered liberty,' and as such ... enforceable against the States .... [W]e would not be true to the Fourteenth Amendment were we merely to stretch the general principle [ of …

Conflict Of Laws-Full Faith And Credit-Extraterritorial Enforcement Of State Revenue Law, Edwin A. Howe Jr.

Michigan Law Review

As the operator of a parking lot within plaintiffs city limits, defendant was subject to a ten percent city tax on his gross receipts. He failed to report the whole of his receipts on his monthly tax returns, and plaintiff, the City of Philadelphia, duly notified him of a five thousand dollar deficiency. Defendant had a statutory right to petition for administrative review of the assessment within sixty days, failing which the liability would become fixed and no longer subject to review or appeal. Rather than appealing, defendant removed himself and his assets to New York, thus preventing plaintiff from …