Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Agency (1)
- American Studies (1)
- Anthropological Linguistics and Sociolinguistics (1)
- Anthropology (1)
- Applied Behavior Analysis (1)
-
- Architecture (1)
- Art and Design (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Business and Corporate Communications (1)
- Civic and Community Engagement (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Communication (1)
- Communication Technology and New Media (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative Psychology (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Engineering (1)
- Controls and Control Theory (1)
- Creative Writing (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Politics and Social Change
Interpreting, Stephanie Jo Kent
Interpreting, Stephanie Jo Kent
Doctoral Dissertations
What do community interpreting for the Deaf in western societies, conference interpreting for the European Parliament, and language brokering in international management have in common? Academic research and professional training have historically emphasized the linguistic and cognitive challenges of interpreting, neglecting or ignoring the social aspects that structure communication. All forms of interpreting are inherently social; they involve relationships among at least three people and two languages. The contexts explored here, American Sign Language/English interpreting and spoken language interpreting within the European Parliament, show that simultaneous interpreting involves attitudes, norms and values about intercultural communication that overemphasize information and discount …
The Politics Of The Face-In-The-Crowd, Mark S. Mills, Kevin B. Smith, John R. Hibbing, Michael Dodd
The Politics Of The Face-In-The-Crowd, Mark S. Mills, Kevin B. Smith, John R. Hibbing, Michael Dodd
Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications
Recent work indicates that the more conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on negative stimuli, whereas the less conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on positive stimuli. The present series of experiments used the face-in-the-crowd paradigm to examine whether variability in the efficiency with which positive and negative stimuli are detected underlies such speed differences. Participants searched for a discrepant facial expression (happy or angry) amid a varying number of neutral distractors (Experiments 1 and 4). A combination of response time and eye movement analyses indicated that variability in search efficiency explained speed differences …