Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Psychology Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Nebraska at Omaha

Psychology Faculty Publications

Series

2013

After-action reviews

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Psychology

Ambiguity And Freedom Of Dissent In Post-Incident Discussion, Cliff Scott, Joseph A. Allen, Daniel L. Bonilla, Benjamin E. Baran, Dave Murphy Oct 2013

Ambiguity And Freedom Of Dissent In Post-Incident Discussion, Cliff Scott, Joseph A. Allen, Daniel L. Bonilla, Benjamin E. Baran, Dave Murphy

Psychology Faculty Publications

The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants’ satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted, the level of post-incident, pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent, however, attenuated the negative influence of …