Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Psychology
Guidelines And Ethical Considerations For Assessment Center Operations, Deborah E. Rupp, Brian J Hoffman, David Bischof, William Byham, Lynn Collins, Alyssa Gibbons, Shinichi Hirose, Martin Kleinmann, Jeffrey D. Kudisch, Martin Lanik, Duncan J. R. Jackson, Myungjoon Kim, Filip Lievens, Deon Meiring, Klaus G. Melchers, Vina G. Pendit, Dan J. Putka, Nigel Povah, Doug Reynolds, Sandra Schlebusch
Guidelines And Ethical Considerations For Assessment Center Operations, Deborah E. Rupp, Brian J Hoffman, David Bischof, William Byham, Lynn Collins, Alyssa Gibbons, Shinichi Hirose, Martin Kleinmann, Jeffrey D. Kudisch, Martin Lanik, Duncan J. R. Jackson, Myungjoon Kim, Filip Lievens, Deon Meiring, Klaus G. Melchers, Vina G. Pendit, Dan J. Putka, Nigel Povah, Doug Reynolds, Sandra Schlebusch
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
This document’s intended purpose is to provide professional guidelines and ethical considerations for users of the assessment center method. These guidelines are designed to cover both existing and future applications. The title assessment center is restricted to those methods that follow these guidelines.
A Construct-Driven Investigation Of Gender Differences In A Leadership-Role Assessment Center, Neil Anderson, Filip Lievens, Karen Van Dam, Marise Born
A Construct-Driven Investigation Of Gender Differences In A Leadership-Role Assessment Center, Neil Anderson, Filip Lievens, Karen Van Dam, Marise Born
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
This study examined gender differences in a large-scale assessment center for officer entry in the British Army. Subgroup differences were investigated for a sample of 1,857 candidates: 1,594 men and 263 women. A construct-driven approach was chosen (a) by examining gender differences at the construct level, (b) by formulating a priori hypotheses about which constructs would be susceptible to gender effects, and (c) by using both effect size statistics and latent mean analyses to investigate gender differences in assessment center ratings. Results showed that female candidates were rated notably higher on constructs reflecting an interpersonally oriented leadership style (i.e., oral …
Large-Scale Investigation Of The Role Of Trait Activation Theory For Understanding Assessment Center Convergent And Discriminant Validity, Filip Lievens, Christopher S. Chasteen, Eric A. Day, Neil D. Christiansen
Large-Scale Investigation Of The Role Of Trait Activation Theory For Understanding Assessment Center Convergent And Discriminant Validity, Filip Lievens, Christopher S. Chasteen, Eric A. Day, Neil D. Christiansen
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
This study used trait activation theory as a theoretical framework to conduct a large-scale test of the interactionist explanation of the convergent and discriminant validity findings obtained in assessment centers. Trait activation theory specifies the conditions in which cross-situationally consistent and inconsistent candidate performances are likely to occur. Results obtained by aggregating correlations across 30 multitrait-multimethod matrices supported the propositions of trait activation theory, shedding a more positive light on the construct validity puzzle in assessment centers. Overall, convergence among assessment center ratings was better between exercises that provided an opportunity to observe behavior related to the same trait, and …