Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abbott v. Abbott (1)
- Bond v. United States (1)
- Canons and principles of interpretation (1)
- Constitutional and foreign relations law (1)
- Customary international law (1)
-
- Deference to executive branch and foreign courts (1)
- Domestic incorporation of international law (1)
- Human rights (1)
- John W. Bricker (1)
- Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez (1)
- Medellin v. Texas (1)
- Reservations (1)
- Restatements (1)
- Roper v. Simmons (1)
- Self-execution (1)
- Treaties as domestic law (1)
- Treaty ratification (1)
- Understandings and declarations (RUDs) (1)
- United States Senate (1)
- Vienna Convention Articles 31 and 32 (1)
- William Proxmire (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in International Relations
Human Rights Treaties In And Beyond The Senate: The Spirit Of Senator Proxmire, Jean Galbraith
Human Rights Treaties In And Beyond The Senate: The Spirit Of Senator Proxmire, Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
In 1995, Louis Henkin wrote a famous piece in which he suggested that the process of human rights treaty ratification was haunted by “the ghost of Senator Bricker” – the isolationist Senator who in the 1950s had waged a fierce assault on the treaty power, especially with regard to human rights treaties. Since that time, Senator Bricker’s ghost has proved even more real. Professor Henkin’s concern was with how the United States ratified human rights treaties, and specifically with the packet of reservations, declarations, and understandings (RUDs) attached by the Senate in giving its advice and consent. Today, the question …
What Should Restatement (Fourth) Say About Treaty Interpretation?, Jean Galbraith
What Should Restatement (Fourth) Say About Treaty Interpretation?, Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law took notably different approaches to treaty interpretation, reflecting intervening changes in the legal landscape. This symposium contribution identifies five developments in international and domestic law since Restatement (Third). It then considers their import for the forthcoming Restatement (Fourth). Most importantly, it argues that Restatement (Fourth) should fully incorporate two articles on treaty interpretation from the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties into its black-letter provisions. Since the time of Restatement (Third), these articles have become central to international practice on treaty interpretation, and the principles they set forth are …