Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Article II (1)
- Constitutional Design (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Litigation (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
-
- Contestation (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Deference (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Doctrinal entrenchment (1)
- Emergency Power (1)
- Executive Power (1)
- Executive Prerogative (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Institutional analysis (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Locke (1)
- Madison (1)
- NAACP (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Prerogative (1)
- Presidential Power (1)
- Royal Prerogative (1)
- Scottsboro (1)
- State of Exception (1)
- Youngstown (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Legal Studies
The Theory And Practice Of Contestatory Federalism, James A. Gardner
The Theory And Practice Of Contestatory Federalism, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
Madisonian theory holds that a federal division of power is necessary to the protection of liberty, but that federalism is a naturally unstable form of government organization that is in constant danger of collapsing into either unitarism or fragmentation. Despite its inherent instability, this condition may be permanently maintained, according to Madison, through a constitutional design that keeps the system in equipoise by institutionalizing a form of perpetual contestation between national and subnational governments. The theory, however, does not specify how that contestation actually occurs, and by what means.
This paper investigates Madison’s hypothesis by documenting the methods actually deployed …
How To Think Constitutionally About Prerogative: A Study Of Early American Usage, Matthew J. Steilen
How To Think Constitutionally About Prerogative: A Study Of Early American Usage, Matthew J. Steilen
Journal Articles
This Article challenges the view of “prerogative” as a discretionary authority to act outside the law. For seventy years, political scientists, lawyers and judges have drawn on John Locke’s account of prerogative in the Second Treatise, using it to read foundational texts in American constitutional law. American writings on prerogative produced between 1760 and 1788 are rarely discussed (excepting The Federalist), though these materials exist in abundance. Based on a study of over 700 of these texts, including pamphlets, broadsides, letters, essays, newspaper items, state papers, and legislative debates, this Article argues that early Americans almost never used “prerogative” as …
Structural Overdelegation In Criminal Procedure, Anthony O'Rourke
Structural Overdelegation In Criminal Procedure, Anthony O'Rourke
Journal Articles
In function, if not in form, criminal procedure is a type of delegation. It requires courts to select constitutional objectives, and to decide how much discretionary authority to allocate to law enforcement officials in order to implement those objectives. By recognizing this process for what it is, this Article identifies a previously unseen phenomenon that inheres in the structure of criminal procedure decision-making.
Criminal procedure’s decision-making structure, this Article argues, pressures the Supreme Court to delegate more discretionary authority to law enforcement officials than the Court’s constitutional objectives can justify. By definition, this systematic “overdelegation” does not result from the …
The Political Economy Of Criminal Procedure Litigation, Anthony O'Rourke
The Political Economy Of Criminal Procedure Litigation, Anthony O'Rourke
Journal Articles
Criminal procedure has undergone several well-documented shifts in its doctrinal foundations since the Supreme Court first began to apply the Constitution’s criminal procedure protections to the States. This Article examines the ways in which the political economy of criminal litigation – specifically, the material conditions that determine which litigants are able to raise criminal procedure claims, and which of those litigants’ cases are appealed to the United States Supreme Court – has influenced these shifts. It offers a theoretical framework for understanding how the political economy of criminal litigation shapes constitutional doctrine, according to which an increase in the number …
Men Of Great And Little Faith: Generations Of Constitutional Scholars, Alfred S. Konefsky
Men Of Great And Little Faith: Generations Of Constitutional Scholars, Alfred S. Konefsky
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.