Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Environmental Studies
Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations At Justiceburg Resevoir On The Double Mountain Fork Of The Brazos River, Garza And Kent Counties, Texas, Douglas K. Boyd, Martha Doty Freeman, Michael D. Blum, Elton R. Prewitt, J. Michael Quigg
Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations At Justiceburg Resevoir On The Double Mountain Fork Of The Brazos River, Garza And Kent Counties, Texas, Douglas K. Boyd, Martha Doty Freeman, Michael D. Blum, Elton R. Prewitt, J. Michael Quigg
Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State
In 1987, Prewitt and Associates, Inc. conducted a Phase I archeological reconnaissance of the proposed Justiceburg Reservoir located in Garza and Kent counties, Texas. The investigations included a 100\ pedestrian survey, a preliminary geoarcheoloqical study, and historic archival and field research. Three hundred and seventy-five sites were documented in the ca. 8600-acre project area. Two hundred and eighty-eight sites contain prehistoric archeological components consisting of: no Paleoindian or early Archaic, 4 middle Archaic, 10 late Archaic, 10 undefined Archaic, 24 Late Prehistoric, 204 undefined prehistoric, and 45 isolated finds (total components = 252). Thirty historic archeological sites identified include 1 …
Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations At Justiceburg Resevoir On The Double Mountain Fork Of The Brazos River, Garza And Kent Counties, Texas Volume Ii, Douglas K. Boyd, Martha Doty Freeman, Michael D. Blum, J. Michael Quigg, Elton R. Prewitt
Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations At Justiceburg Resevoir On The Double Mountain Fork Of The Brazos River, Garza And Kent Counties, Texas Volume Ii, Douglas K. Boyd, Martha Doty Freeman, Michael D. Blum, J. Michael Quigg, Elton R. Prewitt
Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State
The prehistoric site descriptions are divided into three sections: Garza County, Kent County, and Isolated Finds. All sites are described fully in a telegraphic format in order to conserve space. The descriptions are organized by county in alphabetical order and in numerical order of site within each county. Information for each site 1s organized into six headings: location, description, features, cultural materials observed/collected, shovel test data, and assessment/recommendations. The determination of the percentage of the site remaining intact is based on in-field observations of the postulated original areal extent of the site versus what is still potentially intact. Assessments are …