Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Computer Engineering (1)
- Digital Communications and Networking (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Engineering (1)
-
- Government Contracts (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Other Economics (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Economics (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Sociology (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Economics
Beyond Coase: Emerging Technologies And Property Theory, Christopher S. Yoo
Beyond Coase: Emerging Technologies And Property Theory, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
In addition to prompting the development of the Coase Theorem, Ronald Coase’s landmark 1959 article on the Federal Communications Commission touched off a revolution in spectrum policy. Although one of Coase’s proposed reforms (that spectrum should be allocated through markets) has now become the conventional wisdom, his other principal recommendation (that governments stop dedicating portions of the spectrum to particular uses) has yet to be fully embraced. Drawing on spectrum as well as Internet traffic and electric power as examples, this Article argues that emerging technologies often reflect qualities that make defining property rights particularly difficult. These include the cumulative …
The Relational Contingency Of Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
The Relational Contingency Of Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, we demonstrate, contrary to conventional wisdom, that all rights are relationally contingent. Our main thesis is that rights afford their holders meaningful protection only against challengers who face higher litigation costs than the rightholder. Contrariwise, challengers who can litigate more cheaply than a rightholder can force the rightholder to forfeit the right and thereby render the right ineffective. Consequently, in the real world, rights avail only against certain challengers but not others. This result is robust and pervasive. Furthermore, it obtains irrespectively of how rights and other legal entitlements are defined by the legislator or construed by …