Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Bias perception (1)
- Cognitive bias (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Employment Law (1)
- Health care (1)
- Health coverage (1)
- Healthcare costs (1)
- Insuring healthy young adults (1)
- Irrational insurance behavior (1)
- Law and Business (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Liability insurance (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Nudge (1)
- Politics (1)
- Professional negligence (1)
- Race Relations (1)
- Risk (1)
- Social Science and the Law (1)
- Taxation-Federal Income (1)
- Tontine (1)
- Tort compensation (1)
- Torts (1)
- Waiver (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Economics
Recessions And The Social Safety Net: The Alternative Minimum Tax As A Countercyclical Fiscal Stabilizer, Brian Galle, Jonathan Klick
Recessions And The Social Safety Net: The Alternative Minimum Tax As A Countercyclical Fiscal Stabilizer, Brian Galle, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
As recent events illustrate, state finances are procyclical: during recessions, state revenues crash, worsening the effects of economic downturns. This problem is well known, yet persistent. We argue here that, in light of predictable federalism and political economy dynamics, states will be unable to change this situation on their own. Additionally, we note that many possible federal remedies may result in worse problems, such as by creating moral hazard that would induce states to take on excessively risky policy, both fiscal and otherwise. Thus, we argue that policymakers should consider so-called “automatic” stabilizers, such as are found in the federal …
Book Review (Paul Frymer's Black And Blue: African Americans, The Labor Movement, And The Decline Of The Democratic Party)., Sophia Z. Lee
Book Review (Paul Frymer's Black And Blue: African Americans, The Labor Movement, And The Decline Of The Democratic Party)., Sophia Z. Lee
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Tontines For The Invincibles: Enticing Low Risks Into The Health-Insurance Pool With An Idea From Insurance History And Behavioral Economics, Tom Baker, Peter Siegelman
Tontines For The Invincibles: Enticing Low Risks Into The Health-Insurance Pool With An Idea From Insurance History And Behavioral Economics, Tom Baker, Peter Siegelman
All Faculty Scholarship
Over one third of the uninsured adults in the U.S. below retirement age are between 19 and 29 years old. Young adults, especially men, often go without insurance, even when buying it is mandatory and sometimes even when it is a low cost employment benefit. This paper proposes a new form of health insurance targeted at this group—the “Young Invincibles”—those who (wrongly) believe that they don’t need health insurance because they won’t get sick. Our proposal offers a cash bonus to those who turn out to be right in their belief that they did not really need health insurance. The …
The Overstated Promise Of Corporate Governance, Jill E. Fisch
The Overstated Promise Of Corporate Governance, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
Review of Jonathan Macey, Corporate Governance: Promises Kept, Promises Broken (Princeton, 2008)
Can A Patient-Centered Ethos Be Other-Regarding? Ought It Be?, Theodore Ruger
Can A Patient-Centered Ethos Be Other-Regarding? Ought It Be?, Theodore Ruger
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Allowing Patients To Waive The Right To Sue For Medical Malpractice: A Response To Thaler And Sunstein, Tom Baker, Timothy D. Lytton
Allowing Patients To Waive The Right To Sue For Medical Malpractice: A Response To Thaler And Sunstein, Tom Baker, Timothy D. Lytton
All Faculty Scholarship
This essay critically evaluates Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein’s proposal to allow patients to prospectively waive their rights to bring a malpractice claim, presented in their recent, much acclaimed book, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. We show that the behavioral insights that undergird Nudge do not support the waiver proposal. In addition, we demonstrate that Thaler and Sunstein have not provided a persuasive cost-benefit justification for the proposal. Finally, we argue that their liberty-based defense of waivers rests on misleading analogies and polemical rhetoric that ignore the liberty and other interests served by patients’ tort law rights. …