Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons^™

The Legacy Of Hope Summit: A Consensus-Based Initiative And Report On Eating Disorders In The U.S. And Recommendations For The Path Forward, D. Blackwell, Carolyn Black Becker, O. Bermudez, M. E. Berrett, G. E. Brooks, D. W. Bunnell, D. Cabrera, C. Costin, N. Hemendinger, C. Johnson, K. L. Klump, C. A. Levinson, M. Lutter, M. Maine, C. J. Mcadams, B. H. Mcgilley, S. B. Murray, E. Myers, J. D. Ouellette, C. M. Peat, K. Saffran, S. Setliff

Psychology Faculty Research

Background: Several unsuccessful attempts have been made to reach a cross-disciplinary consensus on issues fundamental to the field of eating disorders in the United States (U.S.). In January 2020, 25 prominent clinicians, academicians, researchers, persons with lived experience, and thought leaders in the U.S. eating disorders community gathered at the Legacy of Hope Summit to try again. This paper articulates the points on which they reached a consensus. It also: (1) outlines strategies for implementing those recommendations; (2) identifies likely obstacles to their implementation; and (3) charts a course for successfully navigating and overcoming those challenges.

Methods: Iterative and consensual …

The Three-Legged Stool Of Evidence-Based Practice In Eating Disorder Treatment: Research, Clinical, And Patient Perspectives, C. B. Peterson, Carolyn Becker, J. Treasure, R. Shafran, R. Bryant-Waugh

Psychology Faculty Research

Background

Evidence-based practice in eating disorders incorporates three essential components: research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values, preferences, and characteristics. Conceptualized as a ‘three-legged stool’ by Sackett et al. in 1996 (BMJ), all of these components of evidence-based practice are considered essential for providing optimal care in the treatment of eating disorders. However, the extent to which these individual aspects of evidence-based practice are valued among clinicians and researchers is variable, with each of these stool ‘legs’ being neglected at times. As a result, empirical support and patient preferences for treatment are not consistently considered in the selection and implementation …