Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional History (66)
- Federal convention (13)
- Early Constitution (6)
- Bill of Rights (5)
- Credentials (4)
-
- Delegates (4)
- Parliamentary procedure (4)
- Corrective Constitution (3)
- Federal constitution (3)
- Machine-readable text (3)
- Officials (3)
- Prohibitions (3)
- Quorum (3)
- Secrecy (3)
- Voting regimes (3)
- Adverbs (2)
- Apportionment (2)
- Articles of Confederation (2)
- Constitutional Text Units (2)
- Delegate support for constitution (2)
- Dred Scott (2)
- Dual offices (2)
- Eligibility to hold federal office (2)
- License plate mottoes (2)
- Mobilia (2)
- New state-making (2)
- Per capita (2)
- Per stirpes (2)
- Philadelphia constitution (2)
- Ratification (2)
Articles 61 - 68 of 68
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Table Annexed To Article: What Is A Constitutional Convention?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Table Annexed To Article: What Is A Constitutional Convention?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
‘State constitutional assembly’ is defined along with three subsidiary definitions; difficulties are addressed and solutions proposed; a survey of the 994 assemblies (1775 to 2010) is supplied, and the proposed definition defended; issues for further development are noted.
What Is A Constitutional Convention?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
What Is A Constitutional Convention?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
‘State constitutional assembly’ is defined along with three subsidiary definitions; difficulties are addressed and solutions proposed; a survey of the 994 assemblies (1775 to 2010) is supplied, and the proposed definition defended; issues for further development are noted.
Table Annexed To Article: Who Were The Superfounders?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Table Annexed To Article: Who Were The Superfounders?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Thirty-two of the fifty-five delegates who attended the federal convention went on to attend a ratifying convention; twenty-five are Yes-Founders and one, Gov. Edmund Randolph, won his ‘SuperFounder’ status at the Virginia Ratifying Convention. Never before surveyed as a group, the table annexed names the SuperFounders and details their opposite numbers, the No-Founders.
Delegate Arrivals In Philadelphia Compared To Voting Records At The Ratification Conventions By State, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Delegate Arrivals In Philadelphia Compared To Voting Records At The Ratification Conventions By State, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Fifty-five delegates were appointed by twelve states to attend the federal convention in May, 1787. Eleven states ratified the Constitution between December 7, 1787 and July 26, 1788. When delegate arrival dates are compared with the order in which their respective state ratification conventions completed their business, a significant number of delegates supporting the constitution are missing in action.
When Did The Delegates Arrive In Philadelphia, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
When Did The Delegates Arrive In Philadelphia, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Twelve states appointed fifty-five delegates to attend the federal convention in May, 1787 at Philadelphia. The arrival of the delegates may conveniently be grouped by the order of their arrival; further information assigned to delegates. Information tabled by Farrand (1911, 1937) will be verified and expanded.
Table Annexed To Article: 'Fast And Fourteen:' Delegates Who Left The Federal Convention Early, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Table Annexed To Article: 'Fast And Fourteen:' Delegates Who Left The Federal Convention Early, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Of the fifty-five delegates who attended the federal convention at Philadelphia in 1787, fourteen left before the constitution concluded its business on September 17, 1787. Their voting records disclose that, just like those early arrivers who supported the Constitution, early leavers who opposed the Constitution were overwhelmed by the number of supporters who departed.
Table Annexed To Article: Were Early Arrivers In Philadelphia More Likely To Support The Constitution, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Table Annexed To Article: Were Early Arrivers In Philadelphia More Likely To Support The Constitution, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Table annexed in support of Article: Fifty-five delegates were appointed by twelve states to attend the federal convention in May, 1787. Arrival of the delegates may be matched with support for or opposition to the Constitution. The eagerness of the delegates supporting a new constitution to go to work is demonstrated.
Were Early Arrivers In Philadelphia More Likely To Support The Constitution?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Were Early Arrivers In Philadelphia More Likely To Support The Constitution?, Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Fifty-five delegates were appointed by twelve states to attend the federal convention in May, 1787. Arrival of the delegates may be matched with support for or opposition to the Constitution. The eagerness of the delegates supporting a new constitution to go to work is demonstrated.