Statistics and Probability Commons^™

Loss-Based Estimation With Evolutionary Algorithms And Cross-Validation, David Shilane, Richard H. Liang, Sandrine Dudoit

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

Many statistical inference methods rely upon selection procedures to estimate a parameter of the joint distribution of explanatory and outcome data, such as the regression function. Within the general framework for loss-based estimation of Dudoit and van der Laan, this project proposes an evolutionary algorithm (EA) as a procedure for risk optimization. We also analyze the size of the parameter space for polynomial regression under an interaction constraints along with constraints on either the polynomial or variable degree.

Resampling-Based Empirical Bayes Multiple Testing Procedures For Controlling Generalized Tail Probability And Expected Value Error Rates: , Sandrine Dudoit, Houston N. Gilbert, Mark J. Van Der Laan

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

This article proposes resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling a broad class of Type I error rates, defined as generalized tail probability (gTP) error rates, gTP(q,g) = Pr(g(V_n,S_n) > q), and generalized expected value (gEV) error rates, gEV(g) = [g(V_n,S_n)], for arbitrary functions g(V_n,S_n) of the numbers of false positives V_n and true positives S_n. Of particular interest are error rates based on the …

A Note On Targeted Maximum Likelihood And Right Censored Data, Mark J. Van Der Laan, Daniel Rubin

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

A popular way to estimate an unknown parameter is with substitution, or evaluating the parameter at a likelihood based fit of the data generating density. In many cases, such estimators have substantial bias and can fail to converge at the parametric rate. van der Laan and Rubin (2006) introduced targeted maximum likelihood learning, removing these shackles from substitution estimators, which were made in full agreement with the locally efficient estimating equation procedures as presented in Robins and Rotnitzsky (1992) and van der Laan and Robins (2003). This note illustrates how targeted maximum likelihood can be applied in right censored data …

Detailed Version: Analyzing Direct Effects In Randomized Trials With Secondary Interventions: An Application To Hiv Prevention Trials, Michael A. Rosenblum, Nicholas P. Jewell, Mark J. Van Der Laan, Stephen Shiboski, Ariane Van Der Straten, Nancy Padian

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

This is the detailed technical report that accompanies the paper “Analyzing Direct Effects in Randomized Trials with Secondary Interventions: An Application to HIV Prevention Trials” (an unpublished, technical report version of which is available online at http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper223).

The version here gives full details of the models for the time-dependent analysis, and presents further results in the data analysis section. The Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA) trial is a recently completed randomized trial that investigated the effect of diaphragm and lubricant gel use in reducing HIV infection among susceptible women. 5,045 women were randomly assigned to either the …

Analyzing Direct Effects In Randomized Trials With Secondary Interventions , Michael Rosenblum, Nicholas P. Jewell, Mark J. Van Der Laan, Stephen Shiboski, Ariane Van Der Straten, Nancy Padian

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

The Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA) trial is a recently completed randomized trial that investigated the effect of diaphragm and lubricant gel use in reducing HIV infection among susceptible women. 5,045 women were randomly assigned to either the active treatment arm or not. Additionally, all subjects in both arms received intensive condom counselling and provision, the "gold standard" HIV prevention barrier method. There was much lower reported condom use in the intervention arm than in the control arm, making it difficult to answer important public health questions based solely on the intention-to-treat analysis. We adapt an analysis …

Empirical Efficiency Maximization, Daniel B. Rubin, Mark J. Van Der Laan

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

It has long been recognized that covariate adjustment can increase precision, even when it is not strictly necessary. The phenomenon is particularly emphasized in clinical trials, whether using continuous, categorical, or censored time-to-event outcomes. Adjustment is often straightforward when a discrete covariate partitions the sample into a handful of strata, but becomes more involved when modern studies collect copious amounts of baseline information on each subject.

The dilemma helped motivate locally efficient estimation for coarsened data structures, as surveyed in the books of van der Laan and Robins (2003) and Tsiatis (2006). Here one fits a relatively small working model …

Super Learner, Mark J. Van Der Laan, Eric C. Polley, Alan E. Hubbard

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

Previous articles (van der Laan and Dudoit (2003); van der Laan et al. (2006); Sinisi et al. (2007)) advertised and theoretically validated the use of cross-validation to select among many candidate estimators to compute a so called super learner which outperforms any of the given candidate estimators. The theoretical basis was provided for this super learner based on oracle results for the cross-validation selector (e.g., van der Laan and Dudoit (2003); van der Laan et al. (2006)) and in Sinisi et al. (2007). In addition, these papers contained a practical demonstration of the adaptivity of this so called super learner …

Covariate Adjustment In Randomized Trials With Binary Outcomes: Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation, Kelly L. Moore, Mark J. Van Der Laan

U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series

Covariate adjustment using linear models for continuous outcomes in randomized trials has been shown to increase efficiency and power over the unadjusted method in estimating the marginal effect of treatment. However, for binary outcomes, investigators generally rely on the unadjusted estimate as the literature indicates that covariate-adjusted estimates based on logistic regression models are less efficient. The crucial step that has been missing when adjusting for covariates is that one must integrate/average the adjusted estimate over those covariates in order to obtain the marginal effect. We apply the method of targeted maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), as presented in van der …