Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physics Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Timothy J. Gay Publications

2020

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Physics

Helmholtz Spacing Of Thin Rectangular Magnetic Field Coils, Karl J. Ahrendsen, Sarah Reyes, Timothy J. Gay Nov 2020

Helmholtz Spacing Of Thin Rectangular Magnetic Field Coils, Karl J. Ahrendsen, Sarah Reyes, Timothy J. Gay

Timothy J. Gay Publications

In this Note, we discuss the Helmholtz spacing for a pair of thin rectangular coils of arbitrary aspect ratio and consider how best to use such coils to compensate for Earth’s magnetic field along the coils’ Cartesian symmetry axes. Such coils are frequently used in conjunction with charged-particle beam machines. The Helmholtz spacing varies non-monotonically between that for square coils and that for four optimally spaced infinite wires. We consider other coil spacings that extend the length over which the field varies by less than some tolerance along the Cartesian symmetry axes. The calculations also provide a convenient means to …


The Paradox Of The Tight Spiral Pass In American Football: A Simple Resolution, Richard H. Price, William C. Moss, Timothy J. Gay Jan 2020

The Paradox Of The Tight Spiral Pass In American Football: A Simple Resolution, Richard H. Price, William C. Moss, Timothy J. Gay

Timothy J. Gay Publications

An American football is a rotationally symmetric object, which, when well-thrown, spins rapidly around its symmetry axis. In the absence of aerodynamic effects, the football would be a torque-free gyroscope and the symmetry/spin axis would remain pointing in a fixed direction in space as the football moved on its parabolic path. When a pass is well-thrown through the atmosphere, however, the symmetry axis remains—at least approximately—tangent to the path of motion. The rotation of the symmetry axis must be due to aerodynamic torque; yet, that torque, at first glance, would seem to have precisely the opposite effect. Here, we explain …