Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physiology Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Exercise Physiology

Journal

2023

Resistance exercise

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Physiology

Attenuation Of Neuromuscular Fatigue By Ischemic Preconditioning With Moderate Cuff Pressure Is Not Related To Muscle Oxygen Saturation In Men, Anderson Meireles, Hiago Leandro Rodrigues De Souza, Rhaí André Arriel, Guilherme Guedes Silva Ribeiro, Alex Batista Rodrigues, Géssyca De Oliveira, Bernardo Ide, Mauro Heleno Chagas, Moacir Marocolo Aug 2023

Attenuation Of Neuromuscular Fatigue By Ischemic Preconditioning With Moderate Cuff Pressure Is Not Related To Muscle Oxygen Saturation In Men, Anderson Meireles, Hiago Leandro Rodrigues De Souza, Rhaí André Arriel, Guilherme Guedes Silva Ribeiro, Alex Batista Rodrigues, Géssyca De Oliveira, Bernardo Ide, Mauro Heleno Chagas, Moacir Marocolo

International Journal of Exercise Science

International Journal of Exercise Science 16(2): 1025-1037, 2023. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been an excellent strategy for enhancing sports performance recovery, although there is still no consensus on the ideal protocol. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of IPC with different cuff pressures (low pressure, medium pressure, and high pressure) on the attenuation of neuromuscular fatigue after an isometric test protocol. And to verify whether this improvement was related to muscle oxygen saturation during the test protocol. Thirty males (18-35 years old) with experience in resistance training were allocated to three different groups: low pressure (20 mmHg), medium …


Low-Load X High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After A Training Session, Gabriel Agentilho, Erick Lucena, Luis Felipe M. Teixeira, Vanessa Boas, Isadora Ribeiro, Renato Barroso, Brad Schoenfeld, Marco Uchida May 2023

Low-Load X High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After A Training Session, Gabriel Agentilho, Erick Lucena, Luis Felipe M. Teixeira, Vanessa Boas, Isadora Ribeiro, Renato Barroso, Brad Schoenfeld, Marco Uchida

International Journal of Exercise Science

International Journal of Exercise Science 16(3): 513-524, 2023. Cell swelling caused by resistance training is proposed to provide an anabolic stimulus for muscle growth and it is believed that these effects are heightened with the use of low loads. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of two volume-equated resistance training (RT) protocols, low-load (LL) versus high-load (HL), on elbow flexor muscles thickness, arm circumference, and blood lactate concentration in well-trained individuals. Eight resistance-trained males performed the following two RT protocols involving unilateral elbow flexion of the dominant arm: i) LL, four sets with 50% 1 …


Ischemic Preconditioning Improves The Bench-Press Maximal Strength In Resistance-Trained Men, Anderson Luiz Rodrigues, Bernardo N. Ide Dr., Jeffer Eidi Sasaki, Donizete Cicero X. De Oliveira Oliveira, Claudio De Oliveira Assumpção, Moacir Marocolo, Gustavo Mota Feb 2023

Ischemic Preconditioning Improves The Bench-Press Maximal Strength In Resistance-Trained Men, Anderson Luiz Rodrigues, Bernardo N. Ide Dr., Jeffer Eidi Sasaki, Donizete Cicero X. De Oliveira Oliveira, Claudio De Oliveira Assumpção, Moacir Marocolo, Gustavo Mota

International Journal of Exercise Science

International Journal of Exercise Science 16(4): 217-229, 2023. We investigated whether acute ischemic preconditioning (IPC) would affect upper limb maximal strength performance in resistance-trained men. Using a counterbalanced randomized crossover design, fifteen men (29.9 ± 5.9 yrs.; 86.3 ± 9.6 kg; 8.0 ± 5.0 yrs. resistance training experience) performed one-repetition maximum (1-RM) bench press tests on three different occasions: control, 10 min post-IPC or 10 min post-placebo (SHAM). One-way analysis of variance showed that the post-IPC condition increased (P < 0.0001) 1-RM loads compared to both control and post-SHAM (control 113.3 ± 15.9 kg vs. SHAM 113.9 ± 15.8 kg vs. IPC 115.7 ± 15.6 kg), while control and SHAM did not differ (P > 0.05). Individual results showed that 13 participants (~87%) improved their performance post-IPC compared to control, and 11 participants (~73%) …