Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Swine day (51)
- Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 97-309-S; Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 804; Cattlemen's Day (45)
- 1998; Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 99-120-S; Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 819; Swine; Early-weaned pigs; Growth; Zinc (4)
- 1998; Beef; Steers; Forage; Intake; Digestion; Degradable intake protein (2)
- 1998; Beef; AI; Timed insemination; Horn breeding; Estrous synchronization; Cows (1)
-
- 1998; Beef; Bacterial infection; Salmonella; Campylobacter; E. coli O157:H7; Feedyards; Antibiotic susceptibility (1)
- 1998; Beef; Betaine; Steers; Performance; Feedlot carcasses (1)
- 1998; Beef; Choline; Fat; Finishing; Heifers; Performance; Carcass (1)
- 1998; Beef; Cow-calf herds; E. coli O157:H7; Bacterial infection (1)
- 1998; Beef; Cows; Efficiency; Profitability (1)
- 1998; Beef; Cows; Milking; Suckling; Calf presence; Anestrus (1)
- 1998; Beef; Culled cows; Melengesterol acetate; Implus-H implant; Feedlot health; Carcasses (1)
- 1998; Beef; Cytosine; Protein degradability; Microbial growth (1)
- 1998; Beef; Digestion; Carbohydrate; Forage; Continuous culture (1)
- 1998; Beef; Dry aging; Meat sensory attributes; Meat physical attributes; Microbiology (1)
- 1998; Beef; E. coli O157:H7; Food safety; Fermented beef; Sausage (1)
- 1998; Beef; Fed cattle price; Price discovery (1)
- 1998; Beef; Fed cattle price; Price discovery projections (1)
- 1998; Beef; Finishing cattle; Choline; Fat; Protein; Carcass (1)
- 1998; Beef; Forage intake; Multiple regression; Prediction models (1)
- 1998; Beef; Fusobacterium necrophorum; Liver abscesses; Antibiotic susceptibility (1)
- 1998; Beef; Fusobacterium necrophorum; Ruminal contents; Ruminal wall (1)
- 1998; Beef; Fustobacterium necrophorum; Liver abscesses; Feedlot (1)
- 1998; Beef; Grid pricing; Value-based pricing; Fed cattle prices (1)
- 1998; Beef; Ground Beef; Shelf life; Meat spoilage; Microbiology (1)
- 1998; Beef; Growth implant; Revalor-G; Ralgro; Synovex-H; Heifers; Rye pasture (1)
- 1998; Beef; Heifer development; Economic evaluation; Replacement Heifers (1)
- 1998; Beef; Holstein; Calf-fed steers; Feeding systems; Implants; Carcasses (1)
- 1998; Beef; Implants; Heifers; Feedlot (1)
- 1998; Beef; Infrared thermography; Feedlot cattle (1)
Articles 91 - 97 of 97
Full-Text Articles in Life Sciences
Projecting Fed Cattle Price Discovery Over The Next Decade (1998), J. Mintert, C.E. Ward, D.S. Peel, Ted C. Schroeder
Projecting Fed Cattle Price Discovery Over The Next Decade (1998), J. Mintert, C.E. Ward, D.S. Peel, Ted C. Schroeder
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Interviews were conducted with cattle feeders, beef packers, and others involved in the beef industry to project how fed cattle prices will be discovered in the next decade. Respondents generally indicated that economics will determine beef's market share in 2010, how important public grades and grading will be, and whether consumer brands for fresh beef will become common. Economics also will determine how much influence alliances will have, whether most cattle will be marketed by some value-based pricing system, and what changes will occur in market information and futures markets.
Differences In Efficiency Among Kansas Beef Cow Producers (1998), S. Eidson, Michael R. Langemeier, R. Jones
Differences In Efficiency Among Kansas Beef Cow Producers (1998), S. Eidson, Michael R. Langemeier, R. Jones
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Beef cow producers must manage costs of production and improve production efficiency to compete with hog and poultry and other beef cattle producers. A sample of 46 beef cow enterprises from the Kansas Farm Management database was used to measure technical, economic, and overall efficiencies. On average the farms were 92% technically efficient, 80% economically efficient and 73% overall efficient. Our results suggest that 5% increases in economic and scale efficiencies would increase profit per cow by $20 and $24, respectively.
Early Detection Of Problem Implants Using Infrared Thermography (1998), M.F. Spire, J.C. Galland, James S. Drouillard
Early Detection Of Problem Implants Using Infrared Thermography (1998), M.F. Spire, J.C. Galland, James S. Drouillard
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Thermal imaging of feedlot cattle ears is a noninvasive diagnostic tool that aids in identifying properly placed or abscessed growth-promoting implants. Thirty-two calves were used to determine if abscessed and normal, functional implants could be identified and differentiated using infrared thermography. Infrared images were taken at implantation on days 2, 4, 7, 14, and 21 after implantation. Abscessed implants were easily identified. Use of thermal imaging can verify implant administration and, thus, has the potential to immediately impact feedlot quality assurance programs.
Comparison Of Implants In Grazing Heifers And Carryover Effects On Finishing Gains And Carcass Traits (1998), F.K. Brazle
Comparison Of Implants In Grazing Heifers And Carryover Effects On Finishing Gains And Carcass Traits (1998), F.K. Brazle
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Crossbred yearling heifers were allotted randomly to three grazing implant treatments: 1) control (CONT), 2) Component® E-H (CEH), and 3) Ralgro® (RAL). After grazing native grass for 74 days, the heifers were transported to a western Kansas feedlot. All heifers were implanted with Synovex-H® upon arrival at the feedlot and were reimplanted70 days later with Finaplix-H®. The CEH heifers gained faster while on grass (P<.10) and in the feedlot than the RAL heifers. The CEH heifers had heavier carcasses than RAL heifers. Control heifers had the largest ribeyes. Other carcass traits, including USDA quality grade, were not influenced by pasture treatment. In this study, administration of CEH to heifers grazing native grass optimized overall performance whencombined with the feedlot implants (Synovex-H and Finaplix-H).
Effects Of Feeding Rumensin® In A Mineral Mixture On Steers Grazing Native Grass Pastures (1998), F.K. Brazle, S.B. Laudert
Effects Of Feeding Rumensin® In A Mineral Mixture On Steers Grazing Native Grass Pastures (1998), F.K. Brazle, S.B. Laudert
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Four hundred sixty-nine English and Continental cross yearling steers grazed on native grass pastures over a 2-year period. Rumensin® was added (1,620 g/ton) to the mineral mixture in half of the pastures. Some of the pastures were used from April 23 to July 15 and the remainder from April 23 to August 15. The pooled data for the grazing periods indicated that Rumensin supplemented steers gained 7.7% faster(P<.05) and consumed 32% less mineral (P<.05) compared to the control steers.
Effects Of Revalor-G®, Ralgro®, And Synovex-H® On The Performance Of Stocker Heifers Grazing Irrigated Rye Pasture (1998), Gerry L. Kuhl, Dale A. Blasi
Effects Of Revalor-G®, Ralgro®, And Synovex-H® On The Performance Of Stocker Heifers Grazing Irrigated Rye Pasture (1998), Gerry L. Kuhl, Dale A. Blasi
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
A 151-day field study was conducted to compare three anabolic implants for promoting weight gain in stocker heifers grazing center pivot-irrigated pastures of winter rye. Three hundred previously nonimplanted heifers averaging 421 lb were allotted to one of four treatments: 1) no implant-control (NC), 2) Ralgro® (RAL), 3) Revalor-G® (REV-G) and 4) Synovex-H® (SYN-H). Heifers were weighed at monthly intervals to evaluate the growth response curve of each implant type over time relative to controls. Only during the first 32-day period after implantation did heifers implanted with REV-G gain significantly faster (P<.05) than NC. All implant groups responded similarly (P>.05) during the next three monthly weigh periods. …
Roundup 1998
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Roundup is the major beef cattle education and outreach event sponsored by the Agricultural Research Center-Hays. The purpose is to communicate timely, applicable research information to producers and extension personnel. The research program of the Agricultural Research Center-Hays is dedicated to serving the people of Kansas by developing new knowledge and technology to stabilize and sustain long-term production of food and fiber in a manner consistent with conservation of natural resources, protection of the environment, and assurance of food safety. Primary emphasis is on production efficiency through optimization of inputs in order to increase profit margins for producers in the …