Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Transportation Law
Carriers-Freight Payable In Cash
Carriers-Freight Payable In Cash
Michigan Law Review
The railroad company sought to recover freight charges on coal shipped to defendant. On delivery, the carrier had accepted defendant's check on a local bank for the amount of the charges, as usual. Before presentment the bank failed and defendant contended it was relieved from liability because of the carrier's unjustifiable delay in presenting the check. The Supreme Court held that a payment by check on demand drawn on a going bank in which the drawer has an ample deposit comes within the requirement of the Interstate Commerce Act that payment must be made in money, so defendant was entitled …
Review: Watkins On Shippers And Carriers, Chas. E. Cullen
Review: Watkins On Shippers And Carriers, Chas. E. Cullen
Michigan Law Review
A Book Review on WATKINS ON SHIPPERS AND CARRIERS Fourth edition by Edgar Watkins assisted by J. Halden Alldredge.
Carriers-Liability For Loss Of Goods-Connecting Carriers In Foreign Commerce
Carriers-Liability For Loss Of Goods-Connecting Carriers In Foreign Commerce
Michigan Law Review
A box of furs, shipped from London, England, to New York City, U. S. A., over the line of the defendant navigation company, was delivered to the defendant trucking company at the order of the United States because the duties had not been paid. The trucking company delivered it to the defendant warehouse where it remained a week before being moved by the same trucking company to the United States Appraisal Stores. Here it was discovered that some of the furs had been stolen from the box. Held, the defendant navigation company was not liable as initial carrier under …
Carriers - Liability For Goods Lost By Express Company While Performing Service Contrary To The Filed Tariff
Michigan Law Review
The filed tariff of the defendant express company provided that packages containing money would be received only when delivered at the office of the express company. It was the custom of the defendant. contrary to the tariff provisions, to send a special truck to the office of the shippers when notified that money was to be transported. A shipment oi the plaintiff was thus called for, and the money lost when the truck was held up on the way to the express office. Defendant contended that the service was in violation of the tariff, and that no recovery could be …