Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- ANSI (1)
- ARRA (1)
- Air Commerce Act (1)
- American National Standards Institute (1)
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (1)
-
- BDO (1)
- Behavior Detection Officers (1)
- Chandler v. Miller (1)
- City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (1)
- Davis v. Mississippi (1)
- EPIC (1)
- Electronic Privacy Information Center (1)
- Erie (1)
- FAA (1)
- FAA/AST (1)
- FACS (1)
- Facial Action Coding System (1)
- Federal Aviation Administration (1)
- Katz v. United States (1)
- Kyllo v. United States (1)
- Michigan State Department of Police v. Sitz (1)
- NASA (1)
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab (1)
- Richard Branson (1)
- Rodriguez v. Riddell Sports (1)
- SPOT (1)
- Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques (1)
- TSA (1)
- Terry v. Ohio (1)
- Transportation Safety Administration (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Transportation Law
Blast Off? — Strict Liability’S Potential Role In The Development Of The Commercial Space Market, Mark Flores
Blast Off? — Strict Liability’S Potential Role In The Development Of The Commercial Space Market, Mark Flores
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The sun rises over the mountains in Southern New Mexico and the windows of Spaceport America blind those looking on at the terminal. A sudden boom shakes the ground and a plane unlike any other takes off toward the sky, leaving Spaceport America in the distance.
Bending Broken Rules: The Fourth Amendment Implications Of Full-Body Scanners In Preflight Screening, M. Madison Taylor
Bending Broken Rules: The Fourth Amendment Implications Of Full-Body Scanners In Preflight Screening, M. Madison Taylor
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In the face of emerging technology, the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee of protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is especially susceptible to erosion. As Justice Scalia wrote in Kyllo v. United States, “[i]t would be foolish to contend that the degree of privacy secured to citizens by the Fourth Amendment has been entirely unaffected by the advance of technology.” In Katz v. United States, technology compelled a dramatic shift in the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. Prior to Katz, the Court generally interpreted the Fourth Amendment to prevent only the search and seizure of tangible things, and looked to …