Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Taxation-Transnational Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Brooklyn Law School

Bilateral

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Taxation-Transnational

Treaties In The Aftermath Of Beps, Yariv Brauner Jan 2016

Treaties In The Aftermath Of Beps, Yariv Brauner

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

The article argues that, despite the fanfare around it, the outcome of the BEPS project is unlikely to be dramatic, at least in the short term. Beyond a period of increased legal uncertainty and aggressive enforcement by some countries, it expects little substantive change in tax treaties. The challenges to the dominance of the OECD and the richest countries would likely be assuaged with marginal concessions, most or all of which not be affecting tax treaties. Yet, the article sees a silver lining in the non-substantive, structural, and instrumental outcomes of the BEPS project. It argues that even if unintended, …


Unilateral Responses To Tax Treaty Abuse: A Functional Approach, Omri Marian Jan 2016

Unilateral Responses To Tax Treaty Abuse: A Functional Approach, Omri Marian

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the attention given to abusive tax schemes that take advantage of bilateral tax treaties. The ensuing discourse tends to view potential responses to treaty abuses as a hierarchical set of options, gradually escalating, in which treaty termination is a last resort option. This article argues that the hierarchical view of unilateral responses to treaty abuse is misguided. Unilateral responses to treaty-based abuse are not hierarchically ordered. Rather, the approach to treaty abuse is (and should be) functional, adopting specific types of unilateral responses based on the type of treaty abuse …


The Two Faces Of The Single Tax Principle, Daniel Shaviro Jan 2016

The Two Faces Of The Single Tax Principle, Daniel Shaviro

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

Some argue that a “single tax principle,” said to underlie tax treaties, requires that cross-border income should generally be taxed once, rather than twice or not at all. Even if one accepts this principle, it is important to recognize the difference between “upside” departures, which occur when the same dollar of income is taxed more than once, and “downside” departures, which occur when it is not taxed at all. This article argues that a focus on barring upside departures from the single tax principle can be quite misguided. While over-taxing cross-border activity, relative to that occurring in one country, may …