Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing the US Supreme Court and European Court of Justice Tax Jurisprudence (2)
- European Court of Justice (ECJ) (2)
- U.S. Supreme Court (2)
- Cities (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
-
- Corporations (1)
- Cost-benefit analyses (1)
- Economic development (1)
- Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses (1)
- European and American tax policies and tax jurisprudence (1)
- Fiscal federalism (1)
- Illinois (1)
- Incentives (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Property tax (1)
- Public interests (1)
- State agencies (1)
- Tax expenditures (1)
- Tax incentives (1)
- Tax revenues (1)
- Taxpayers (1)
- Treaty of Rome (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Taxation-State and Local
Introduction To Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing The European Court Of Justice And The Us Supreme Court's Tax Jurisprudence, James R. Hines Jr.
Introduction To Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing The European Court Of Justice And The Us Supreme Court's Tax Jurisprudence, James R. Hines Jr.
Other Publications
This volume brings together scholars from both sides of the Atlantic to consider federalist tax jurisprudence as practiced in Europe and the United States. These essays display a broad range of shared concerns, which is not to say that the scholars agree on all points of substantive policy and interpretation. What can be said is that there is general agreement that the exercise of comparing the tax jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and the US Supreme Court is likely to be informative and beneficial to all concerned.
The Ideal Deal: How Local Governments Can Get More For Their Economic Development Dollar, Rachel Weber, David Santacroce
The Ideal Deal: How Local Governments Can Get More For Their Economic Development Dollar, Rachel Weber, David Santacroce
Books
This handbook is designed to provide local economic development practitioners with an important tool. It takes the reader step-by-step through the different elements of contracts that treat public incentive packages as a quid pro quo for public benefits. Each section discusses a different element of the ideal deal: valuation of public costs and benefits, performance standards, disclosure and oversight, and enforcement. In each section we provide detailed examples of model provisions used by local governments in their incentive legislation, ordinances, and contracts -- information that has not before been obtained or recorded in any systematic way. These examples are meant …
Preface To Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing The European Court Of Justice And The Us Supreme Court's Tax Jurisprudence, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Preface To Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing The European Court Of Justice And The Us Supreme Court's Tax Jurisprudence, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Other Publications
In October 2005, a group of distinguished tax experts from both the European Union and the United States convened at the University of Michigan Law School for a conference on 'Comparative Fiscal Federalism: Comparing the US Supreme Court and European Court of Justice Tax Jurisprudence.' The conference was sponsored by the Law School, the European Union Center, and Harvard Law School's Fund for Tax and Fiscal Research. Attendees from Europe included Michel Au jean, the principal tax official at the EU Commission, Servaas van Thiel, chief tax advisor to the EU Council, Michael Lang (Vienna) and Kees van Raad (Leiden), …