Tax Law Commons^™

Section 179 Expensing And The Bonus Depreciation Allowance: Their Application, History, Costs, And Benefits., Alice E. Keane

Alice E. Keane

This article examines Section 179 expensing and the bonus depreciation allowance, tax incentives that allow businesses to dramatically accelerate deductions on purchases of most tangible property. Generally, Section 179 expensing benefits smaller businesses, while the bonus depreciation allowance, which is more controversial and costly, is more useful to larger businesses and C corporations. Both of these tax incentives expired at the end of 2014. Congress is currently considering bills that would extend these incentives retroactively to 2015 and beyond. There is conflicting evidence of the benefit to the economy of Section 179 expensing and the bonus depreciation allowance, with certain …

Income Tax Accounting Consistency: Eliminate Accrual And Depreciation, And Revamp The Tax Treatment Of Borrowing, Joseph M. Dodge

Joseph M Dodge

Abstract for

INCOME TAX ACCOUNTING CONSISTENCY: ELIMINATE ACCRUAL AND DEPRECIATION, AND REVAMP THE TAX TREATMENT OF BORROWING

Joseph M. Dodge

Professor Emeritus, Florida State University College of Law

The thesis is that inconsistent tax accounting rules undermine the individual income tax, and the best available move for improving it – given the unassailability of the realization principle - is to eliminate its accrual (and quasi-accrual) features. Specifically, the agenda is to eliminate tax accrual accounting in the conventional sense, revamp the tax treatment of borrowing to (inter alia) abolish the Crane doctrine, and eliminate depreciation deductions for indivisible productive assets. …

Allocative Fairness And The Income Tax, Joseph Dodge

Joseph M Dodge

Abstract for: Allocative Fairness and the Income Tax

This article seeks to provide a normative justification for the “allocative tax fairness” principle of “objective ability to pay.” First off is a brief overview of norm categories as they relate to taxation. Here, the category of internal-to-tax fairness (“allocative fairness”), referring to how the tax burden should be apportioned among the population, is identified as being distinct from a conception of a good or just society (social equity). Allocative tax fairness is often referred to as “horizontal equity.” Unfortunately, that notion is purely formal, and the remainder of the article develops …