Tax Law Commons^™

Comments On Proposed Treasury Regulations Defining Terms Relating To Marital Status, Anthony C. Infanti, The American Bar Association

Articles

These comments respond to proposed Treasury Regulations defining terms relating to marital status in the Internal Revenue Code following the Supreme Court's decision in the Windsor and Obergefell cases. The comments applaud the Internal Revenue Service for reading gendered terms relating to marital status in a gender-neutral fashion. For a number of reasons, however, the comments recommend that the final regulations omit the proposed rule for determining an individual’s marital status and, in its place, codify the current deference to local law in determining marital status for federal tax purposes. Most importantly, the comments further recommend that the final regulations …

Random Thoughts On Applying Judicial Doctrines To Interpret The Internal Revenue Code, Martin J. Mcmahon Jr.

Martin J. McMahon

From the symposium "Business Purpose, Economic Substance, and Corporate Tax Shelters" .

Employee Medical Reimbursement Plans In The Age Of Erisa, Robert D. Rosewater

Akron Law Review

THE EMPLOYEE MEDICAL reimbursement plan presents a new dimension in the spectrum of available corporate fringe benefits. Its attractiveness lies in the relative ease by which the plan may be adopted and administered as well as the favorable federal income tax consequences to both the corporation and its participating employees. These plans undoubtedly will proliferate as other traditional fringe benefits become less attractive due to changes in tax laws,2 as medical expenses continue to increase, and as the advantages of employee medical reimbursement plans become more widely known. The scope of this article is to discuss the purposes of these …

Trading With Related Foreign Entitites: Current American Tax Perspective, Mortimer Caplin

Akron Law Review

This article attempts to summarize existing United States tax law and government policy on arm's-length dealing, with the hope that it will illuminate the current perspective in this important and complex area

Nontaxpayer Suits: Seeking Injunctive And Declaratory Relief Against Irs Administrative Action, John A. Lynch

Akron Law Review

Who should be entitled to challenge Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax policy decision making? Should the concerned citizen or the aggrieved competitor of a company receiving favorable treatment from the IRS be precluded from seeking review of allegedly illegal action when his own taxes are not specifically involved? ...

It is clear from an analysis of recent decisions that several federal courts have been unwilling to accept the proposition that the Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act exception insulate the IRS from judicial scrutiny even when judicial intervention would pose no threat to federal revenues. An analysis of the …

Internal Revenue Service Review Of Tax Accrual Workpapers United States V. Arthur Young & Co., Steven Dimengo

Akron Law Review

The broad summoning power of the Internal Revenue Service [IRS] which enables it to examine any documents related to a taxpayer's liability' was challenged in United States v. Arthur Young & Co. The major issue of the proceedings was whether tax accrual workpapers, prepared by a taxpayer's independent auditor during the course of an annual audit, were subject to disclosure to the IRS pursuant to a summons under section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. In reaching its holding, the Supreme Court had to determine whether tax accrual workpapers were relevant to an IRS inquiry within the meaning …

Dickman And Code Section 7872: The Death Knell To Interest-Free And Below-Market Loans, Beverly Mcdonel

Akron Law Review

This comment will discuss the history of interest-free and below-market rate loans, including recent changes in the law from Dickman and the Internal Revenue Code (Code) revision in 1984. In addition, some of the tax planning alternatives to interest-free loans will be briefly examined.

Carroll V. Commissioner: Narrow Judicial Interpretations Of Internal Revenue Code' § 7502 May Cause Increased Burden On Taxpayers, Nicole D. Stanger

Akron Law Review

In Carroll v. Commissioner, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the minority viewpoint that the statute repeals the common law presumption of delivery in all cases other than those where the taxpayer used registered or certified mail. Thus, taxpayers who do not send tax documents using registered or certified mail must bear the risk of nondelivery. Critics of this decision contend that the court misinterpreted the I.R.C. As a result of the court's narrow interpretation, taxpayers may suffer substantial tax losses and penalties even when a document is lost through no fault of their own. …

Commissioner Of Internal Revenue V. Lundy: Transforming "An Intended Benefit Into A Handicap"?, Douglas Edwards

Akron Law Review

This Note analyzes the Court's decision in Lundy. Part II examines the relevant statutory provisions concerning the power granted to the Tax Court and federal district court. Part III addresses the facts, procedural history, and holding of the Court." Part IV(A) analyzes the holding of the case. Part IV(B) addresses several dissenting arguments, and contends that the Court could have clarified this murky area of the law by adopting the holding of Miller v. United States.

Exile To Main Street: The I.R.S.'S Diminished Role In Overseeing Tax-Exempt Organizations, Evelyn Brody, Marcus Owens

Chicago-Kent Law Review

The Internal Revenue Service’s post-Citizens United approach to political activity by would-be tax-exempt organizations has threatened the financial health of the entire agency. Suffering from a siege mentality in the best of times, the IRS predictably and understandably responded to the asserted “scandal” by retreating into a shell of bureaucratic reshuffling, management mumbo-jumbo, and paper moving. A fresh cadre of senior management lacking relevant experience has overhauled the exempt-organization function and emphasized granting recognition of exemption now and (possibly) asking questions later. The new self-certification process of exemption for small charities could also be setting the agency up for the …

Politics, Disclosure, And State Law Solutions For 501(C)(4) Organizations, Linda Sugin

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Since the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC, there has been an explosion in section 501(c)(4) organizations active in politics. Unable to effectively process applications, the IRS mishandled organizations with conservative political ties, producing a scandal from which the agency has yet to recover. It proposed regulations that would have helped it more easily determine eligibility for 501(c)(4) exemption, but after massive public outcry, the regulations were withdrawn. No new regulations will be proposed before the 2016 presidential election.

Given the federal government’s inability to address the problem of dark money politicking by 501(c)(4) organizations through …

Fragmented Oversight Of Nonprofits In The United States: Does It Work? Can It Work?, Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer

Chicago-Kent Law Review

The United States is well known for its distinctive, although not unique, division of political authority between the federal government and the various states. This division is particularly evident when it comes to oversight of nonprofit organizations. The historical focus of federal government oversight has been limited primarily to qualification for tax exemption and other tax benefits, with more plenary power resting with state authorities. Over time, however, the federal government’s role has come to overlap significantly with that of the states, and many nonprofits have become subject to regulation by multiple states as their operations and donor bases expand …

A Tax Audible: Coaches And Buyouts, Jeffrey H. Kahn

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.

Tax Whistleblower Statute: Obtaining Meaningful Appeals Through The Appropriate Scope Of Review, Matthew R. Stock

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Moonscape Of Tax Equality: Windsor And Beyond, Anthony C. Infanti

Northwestern University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Belk V. Commissioner: Land Substitutions In Conservation Easements, Morgan Davis

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.