Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Estate planning (2)
- Taxation (2)
- Trusts and trustees (2)
- Autónomos (1)
- Bruno (1)
-
- Comisión de Derechos Humanos (1)
- Congreso (1)
- Corporate tax (1)
- Costantini (1)
- Cuarto Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autónomos (1)
- Definition of family (1)
- Estate and gift tax (1)
- Estate tax (1)
- Family LLC (1)
- Income tax (1)
- Indirect gift (1)
- Ithaca Trust (1)
- Linton (1)
- Lottery payments (1)
- Memorias (1)
- Memorias de la OPAM (1)
- México (1)
- Nacional (1)
- Negron (1)
- Non-marketability discount (1)
- Nonmarketability discount (1)
- OPAM (1)
- Organismos (1)
- Públicos (1)
- Step transaction doctrine (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Tax Law
Linton Family Llc And The Step Transaction Doctrine, Wendy G. Gerzog
Linton Family Llc And The Step Transaction Doctrine, Wendy G. Gerzog
All Faculty Scholarship
This article discusses Linton, a district court decision about a family limited liability company, indirect gifts, and the step transaction doctrine.
Families For Tax Purposes: What About The Steps, Wendy G. Gerzog
Families For Tax Purposes: What About The Steps, Wendy G. Gerzog
All Faculty Scholarship
At least 4.4 million families in the U.S. are blended ones that include step-children and step-parents. For tax purposes, these steps receive preferential treatment for their status because they are on the one hand included as family members for many income tax benefit sections, but on the other hand excluded as family members for business entity attribution purposes and for gift and estate tax anti-abuse provisions. In the interests of fairness and uniformity, steps should be treated as family members for all tax purposes where steps have in fact voluntarily acted as their biological or adoptive counterparts, both when such …
Cuarto Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Cuarto Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Memorias del Cuarto Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autónomos
"El papel de los Organismos Públicos Autónomos en la Consolidación de la Democracia"
Negron: Circuits Now Split 2-2, Wendy G. Gerzog
Negron: Circuits Now Split 2-2, Wendy G. Gerzog
All Faculty Scholarship
The article discusses Negron and the circuit split on the issue of whether to value non-assignable lottery payments in a decedent's estate by means of the actuarial tables or whether that value needs to be discounted for non-marketability.
The Irs's Flawed Solution To The Controversy Over Deductible Claims Against The Estate And The Necessity For A Date-Of-Death Standard, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 789 (2009), Lisa K. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Whom Do You Trust? A Reply To Prof. Kahn, Stephen B. Cohen
Whom Do You Trust? A Reply To Prof. Kahn, Stephen B. Cohen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In his 2008 opinion in Knight v. Commissioner, Chief Justice John Roberts harshly criticized then Court of Appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor, writing that her approach to the Internal Revenue Code “flies in the face of the statute.” In the August 3 issue of Tax Notes, I argued that Roberts’ criticism of Sotomayor was “logically flawed and unwarranted.” In the September 21 issue of Tax Notes, Prof. Douglas Kahn defended Robert’s criticism of Sotomayor as “persuasive and accurate” and attacked Sotomayor’s opinion in the case and my defense of what she wrote. I believe that Prof. Kahn’s arguments in defense of …
Judge Sonia Sotomayor’S Tax Opinions, Stephen B. Cohen
Judge Sonia Sotomayor’S Tax Opinions, Stephen B. Cohen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Judge Sonia Sotomayor has written three published opinions on federal taxation, one as a District Court judge and two as a Court of Appeals judge. Two of the opinions deal with routine matters and are unremarkable in the sense that it is difficult to imagine the cases coming out any other way. Her third opinion, however, in William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner, 467 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd sub nom. Knight v. Commissioner, 552 U.S. 181, 128 S. Ct. 782 (2008), generated a sharp difference of opinion with Chief Justice Roberts. Although Chief Justice Roberts, writing for …