Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Supreme Court of the United States Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States

Constitutional Law - New Deal Legislation - Gold Hoarding Statute Nov 1934

Constitutional Law - New Deal Legislation - Gold Hoarding Statute

Michigan Law Review

Two cases involving acts of Congress passed in March 1933 to prevent the hoarding of gold' were denied a review by the United States Supreme Court on October 8. Both of these cases involved the same facts. Plaintiff had delivered certain gold bars to a bank for safe-keeping. Later the bank notified him that, pursuant to an executive order by the President of the United States, it would have to surrender the gold. Immediately the plaintiff demanded the return of the bullion, which demand was refused, and he filed bills for specific performance of the bailment contract against the bank …


The Grant Of Rule-Making Power To The Supreme Court Of The United States, Edson R. Sunderland Jun 1934

The Grant Of Rule-Making Power To The Supreme Court Of The United States, Edson R. Sunderland

Michigan Law Review

The determined effort on the part of the American Bar Association, which continued without relaxation for almost a quarter of a century, to place the regulation of federal trial court procedure in law actions under the control of the Supreme Court of the United States, has at last been successful. Senate Bill No. 3040, granting full rulemaking power to the Supreme Court, became a law on June 19, 1934.


Federal Practice- Declaratory Judgments Apr 1934

Federal Practice- Declaratory Judgments

Michigan Law Review

Alabama, for the purpose of invoking original jurisdiction, applied to the Supreme Court of the United States for leave to file a complaint in equity against nineteen States to have statutes regulating and prohibiting the sale of goods manufactured by convict labor declared void because in violation of the commerce clause of the federal Constitution. Later, Alabama was allowed to submit an amendment eliminating fourteen States. Held, leave to file bill as amended denied. State of Alabama v. State of Arizona, et al., (U. S. 1934) 1 U. S. LAW WEEK (Feb. 6, 1934), index p. 468.


Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court (Cont.), Hugh Evander Willis Jan 1934

Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court (Cont.), Hugh Evander Willis

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court, Hugh Evander Willis Jan 1934

Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court, Hugh Evander Willis

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court, Part 2, Hugh Evander Willis Jan 1934

Capitalism, The United States Constitution And The Supreme Court, Part 2, Hugh Evander Willis

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.