Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
![Digital Commons Network](http://assets.bepress.com/20200205/img/dcn/DCsunburst.png)
State and Local Government Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Assessment (1)
- Asset Fragmentation (1)
- Corporate charter provisions (1)
- Corporation law (1)
- Corporations (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Delaware (1)
- Delaware tensions with U.S. Congress (1)
- Dodd-Frank (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
- Incomplete Takings (1)
- Intervention by Delaware legislators (1)
- Just Compensation (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Options Theory (1)
- Partial Takings (1)
- Proxy access bylaws & rule (1)
- Proxy expense bylaw (1)
- Put Option (1)
- Sarbanes-Oxley (1)
- Shareholder litigation (1)
- Takings (1)
- Takings Compensation (1)
- Valuation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law
Partial Takings, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
Partial Takings, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
Partial takings allow the government to expropriate the parts of an asset it needs, leaving the owner the remainder. Both vital and common, partial takings present unique challenges to the standard rules of eminent domain. Partial takings may result in the creation of suboptimal, and even unusable, parcels. Additionally, partial takings create assessment problems that do not arise when parcels are taken as a whole. Finally, partial takings engender opportunities for inefficient strategic behavior on the part of the government after the partial taking has been carried out. Current jurisprudence fails to resolve these problems and can even exacerbate them. …
The Bylaw Puzzle In Delaware Corporate Law, David A. Skeel Jr.
The Bylaw Puzzle In Delaware Corporate Law, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
In less than a decade, Delaware’s legislature has overruled its courts and reshaped Delaware corporate law on two different occasions, with proxy access bylaws in 2009 and with shareholder litigation bylaws in 2015. Having two dramatic interventions in quick succession would be puzzling under any circumstances. The interventions are doubly puzzling because with proxy access, Delaware’s legislature authorized the use of bylaws or charter provisions that Delaware’s courts had banned; while with shareholder litigation, it banned bylaws or charter provisions that the courts had authorized. This Article attempts to unravel the puzzle.
I start with corporate law doctrine, and find …