Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Shareholder (2)
- United States (2)
- Accountability (1)
- Agenda (1)
- Bidder (1)
-
- Board of Directors (1)
- Commodity futures (1)
- Company (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Constituency Statute (1)
- Constituent (1)
- Control (1)
- Corporate (1)
- Corporate Board (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate Lobbying (1)
- Corporation (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Decision (1)
- Director (1)
- Discovery law (1)
- Employee (1)
- Employer (1)
- Europe (1)
- Extraterritorial (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Foreign (1)
- Global (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Government (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
The Misappropriation Theory In Light Of Carpenter And The Insider Trading And Securities Fraud Enforcement Act Of 1988, Mark A. Clayton
The Misappropriation Theory In Light Of Carpenter And The Insider Trading And Securities Fraud Enforcement Act Of 1988, Mark A. Clayton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulatory Conflicts: International Tender And Exchange Offers In The 1990s, John C. Maguire
Regulatory Conflicts: International Tender And Exchange Offers In The 1990s, John C. Maguire
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Striking The Wrong Balance: Constituency Statutes And Corporate Governance , Edward D. Rogers
Striking The Wrong Balance: Constituency Statutes And Corporate Governance , Edward D. Rogers
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rescuing Expedited Discovery From The Commodity Futures Trading Commission & Returning It To Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(D)(1): Using A Doctrine's Forgotten History To Achieve Legitimacy, Jesse N. Panoff, Esq.
Rescuing Expedited Discovery From The Commodity Futures Trading Commission & Returning It To Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(D)(1): Using A Doctrine's Forgotten History To Achieve Legitimacy, Jesse N. Panoff, Esq.
Golden Gate University Law Review
For over a decade, judicial decisions have “authorized” the CFTC to conduct expedited discovery irrespective of 26(d)(1)’s structure and text. Instead, courts typically allow discovery because either: (i) “good cause” exists, or (ii) for no articulated reason at all. Consider that the so-called Good-Cause Test merely proclaims, “[g]ood cause exists for the plaintiff [CFTC] to conduct expedited discovery . . . .” Hence, judicial decisions have developed the doctrine in ways that are attenuated from 26(d)(1). The overall result is if the Commission asks for accelerated discovery, then courts will grant such relief. This is somewhat unsurprising because the very …