Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Securities Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2011

William & Mary Law School

SEC v. W.J. Howey

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Securities Law

The Howey Test Turns 64: Are The Courts Grading This Test On A Curve?, Miriam R. Albert Feb 2011

The Howey Test Turns 64: Are The Courts Grading This Test On A Curve?, Miriam R. Albert

William & Mary Business Law Review

Sixty-four years ago, the Supreme Court decided SEC v. W.J. Howey, crafting a definition for one form of security, known as an investment contract. The Supreme Court’s definition of investment contract in Howey is flexible, consistent with the Congressional approach to defining the broader concept of what constitutes a security. This choice of adopting a flexible definition for investment contract is not without cost, and raises the specter of inconsistent interpretation and/or application by the lower courts that threatens to undermine the utility of the Howey test itself as a trigger for investor protection. The intentional breadth and adaptability of …