Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Toward A Just Measure Of Repose: The Statute Of Limitations For Securities Fraud, Michael J. Kaufman, John M. Wunderlich
Toward A Just Measure Of Repose: The Statute Of Limitations For Securities Fraud, Michael J. Kaufman, John M. Wunderlich
William & Mary Law Review
Statutes of limitations, a long-standing bulwark of civil litigation, mitigate the risk that evidence of meritorious claims will become stale and relieve defendants who might be exposed to claims from unending uncertainty about whether claims will be brought. But these twin rationales are balanced against allowing plaintiffs sufficient time to discover and file meritorious claims. This balance is manifest in the judicial and congressional effort to fashion a statute of limitations for securities fraud claims. The Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. Reynolds recently attempted to strike that balance in its interpretation of the statute of limitations for securities …
Mismatch: The Misuse Of Market Efficiency In Market Manipulation Class Actions, Charles R. Korsmo
Mismatch: The Misuse Of Market Efficiency In Market Manipulation Class Actions, Charles R. Korsmo
William & Mary Law Review
Plaintiffs commonly bring two distinct types of claims under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: (1) claims of material misrepresentations or omissions, and (2) claims of tradebased market manipulation. Despite the distinctive features of the two types of claims, courts have tended to treat them identically when applying the “fraud on the market” doctrine. In particular, courts have required both types of plaintiffs to make identical showings that the relevant security was traded in an “efficient market” in order to gain a presumption of reliance. The reasons for requiring such a showing by plaintiffs in a misrepresentation …