Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Regulation (2)
- Algorithmic Trading (1)
- Bitcoin (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Dark Pools (1)
-
- Eastman Dillon & Co. (1)
- Flash Boys (1)
- HFT (1)
- High Frequency Trade (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights (1)
- Inc.; Tellabs (1)
- Invest (1)
- Ltd. (1)
- Market Manipulation (1)
- Regulation AT (1)
- Securities (1)
- Securities; traders; artificial intelligence; markets; regulation; machine learning; intent; scienter; price manipulation; enforcement action; deep learning; artificial neural networks; ANN; financial modeling; The Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; black box; autonomous trading; wash sale; 10(b); SEC; 10(b)-5; 20(a); CFTC; FINRA; broker-dealer; SEC v. Masri; SROs; GAAP; financial reporting; recklessness; circumstantial evidence; misstatements; omissions; Facebook; Rolf v. Blyth (1)
- Technology (1)
- Virtual currency (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Artificial Intelligence & Artificial Prices: Safeguarding Securities Markets From Manipulation By Non-Human Actors, Daniel W. Slemmer
Artificial Intelligence & Artificial Prices: Safeguarding Securities Markets From Manipulation By Non-Human Actors, Daniel W. Slemmer
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Securities traders are currently competing to use Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) in order to make more profitable decisions in the marketplace. While A.I. provides superior abilities in recognizing market patterns, its complexity can obscure its decision-making process beyond human comprehension. Problematically, the current securities laws prohibiting manipulation of securities prices rest liability for violations on a trader’s intent. In order to prepare for A.I. market participants, both courts and regulators need to accept that human concepts of decision-making will be inadequate in regulating A.I. behavior. However, the wealth of case law in the market manipulation doctrine need not be cast aside. …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Has Regulation Affected The High Frequency Trading Market?, Kevin O'Connell
Has Regulation Affected The High Frequency Trading Market?, Kevin O'Connell
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
As technology rapidly advances society, there are a few industries that have not been drastically impacted by disruptive technology. The financial markets are no different. Over the past ten years, algorithmic trading has quickly revolutionized the financial markets and continues to dominate an industry that for many years remained largely uninfluenced by society’s technological advances. Algorithmic trading is “a type of trading done with the use of mathematical formulas” and market data “run by powerful computers” to execute trades. One of the most commonly used platforms of algorithmic trading is high frequency trading. High frequency trading (“HFT”) uses a computerized …
Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies, And The Struggle Of Law And Regulation To Keep Pace
Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies, And The Struggle Of Law And Regulation To Keep Pace
Marquette Law Review
At less than a decade old, Bitcoin and other virtual currencies have had a major societal impact, and proven to be a unique payment systems challenge for law enforcement, financial regulatory authorities worldwide, and the investment community. Rapid introduction and diffusion of technological changes throughout society, such as the blockchain that serves as Bitcoin’s crypto-foundation, continue to exceed the ability of law and regulation to keep pace. During 2017 alone, the market price of Bitcoin rose 1,735%, from about $970 to $14,292, causing an investor feeding frenzy. As of September 11, 2018, a total of 1,935 cryptocurrencies are reported, having …