Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2)
- 126 Stat. 306 (1)
- 307 (2012) (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Bubble laws (1)
-
- Computer; fiduciary; hacking; insider trading; securities; Securities Exchange Act; hacker-seller; 10b-5 (1)
- Deregulation (1)
- Dictation and Delegation (1)
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank); Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); Rulemaking; Dodd-Frank Section 953(b); Administrative Procedure Act (APA); D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals; Pay Ratio disclosure; CEO Compensation; Congress; Soft Pay Cap; Median Compensation; Chevron Deference; Independent Compensation Committee; "Median Employee"; Item 402 of Regulation S-K; Say-on-Pay Votes; Cost of Compliance; De Minimis Exception; Congress; "Name and Blame"; Business Roundtable v. SEC; Chamber of Commerce v. SEC; American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co. v. SEC; "Uncertain Legal Status"; National Association of Manufacturers v. SEC; Arbitrary and Capricious Standard; Amending 953(B) (1)
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; Fraud; Hedge Funds; Misappropriation of Assets; Systemic Risk; Financial Systems; Securities Regulation; Institutional Investors; Risk Prevention; Systemic Failure; Long Term Capital Management (LTCM); Retailization; Leveraged Assets; Depository-Custodian; External Independent Valuer; Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); Defining Hedge Funds; The Alpha; The Securities Act of 1933; The Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; The Investment Company Act of 1940; The Investment Advisers Act of 1940; Bank Runs; Derivatives; Short Selling; Trading Volume; Repo Agreements; Like-Banks Activities; Investor Protection; Scandals; The Sophisticated Investor Doctrine; Pension Funds; Compliance; SEC's Anti-Fraud Rule; SEC's Custody Rule; The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) (1)
- False Claims Act (1)
- Financial reform (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Governance (1)
- JOBS Act (1)
- Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Pub. L. No. 112-106 (1)
- Reactionary legislation (1)
- Recovery (1)
- Retaliation (1)
- Rule making (1)
- Rules (1)
- SEC (1)
- Securities Regulation (1)
- Self-executing law (1)
- Statues (1)
- United States Congress (1)
- Whistleblowers (1)
- Whistleblowing (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Protecting Whistleblowing (And Not Just Whistleblowers), Evan J. Ballan
Protecting Whistleblowing (And Not Just Whistleblowers), Evan J. Ballan
Michigan Law Review
When the government contracts with private parties, the risk of fraud runs high. Fraud against the government hurts everyone: taxpayer money is wasted on inferior or nonexistent products and services, and the public bears the burdens attendant to those inadequate goods. To combat fraud, Congress has developed several statutory frameworks to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and report wrongdoing in exchange for a monetary reward. The federal False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to file an action in federal court on behalf of the United States, and to share in any recovery. Under the Dodd- Frank Act, the SEC Office of …
Dictation And Delegation In Securities Regulation, Usha Rodrigues
Dictation And Delegation In Securities Regulation, Usha Rodrigues
Indiana Law Journal
When Congress undertakes major financial reform, either it dictates the precise con-tours of the law itself or it delegates the bulk of the rule making to an administrative agency. This choice has critical consequences. Making the law self-executing in federal legislation is swift, not subject to administrative tinkering, and less vulnerable than rule making to judicial second-guessing. Agency action is, in contrast, deliberate, subject to ongoing bureaucratic fiddling, and more vulnerable than statutes to judicial challenge.
This Article offers the first empirical analysis of the extent of congressional delegation in securities law from 1970 to the present day, examining nine …
Clicks And Tricks: How Computer Hackers Avoid 10b-5 Liability, Ryan H. Gilinson
Clicks And Tricks: How Computer Hackers Avoid 10b-5 Liability, Ryan H. Gilinson
Brooklyn Law Review
This note argues that computer hackers who sell inside information instead of trading on it themselves, referred to in the note as hacker-sellers, avoid liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. Rule 10b-5 criminalizes the use of a manipulative or deceptive device “in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.” Hacker-sellers fall outside the scope of this rule for two reasons. First, the type of hacking employed by hacker-sellers is not always “deceptive,” and only the forms of hacking which deceive the computer into thinking an authorized user is seeking access are …
From Systemic Risk To Financial Scandals: The Shortcomings Of U.S. Hedge Fund Regulation, Marco Bodellini
From Systemic Risk To Financial Scandals: The Shortcomings Of U.S. Hedge Fund Regulation, Marco Bodellini
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In the recent past, hedge funds have demonstrated that they can pose and spread systemic risk across the financial markets, and that their managers can use them to commit fraud and misappropriation of fund assets. Even if the first issue now seems to be considered a serious one by the U.S. legislature, which in 2010, as a legislative response to the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, enacted the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), the current regulation still appears inconsistent and inappropriate to prevent and face it. By contrast, the second issue is not always considered …
Full Disclosure: Moving Beyond Disclosure Regulations To Affirmative Regulation Of Executive Compensation, Christopher Saverino
Full Disclosure: Moving Beyond Disclosure Regulations To Affirmative Regulation Of Executive Compensation, Christopher Saverino
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In the period following the financial crisis of 2008, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), which compelled the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to engage in substantial rulemaking. The Dodd-Frank mandate in Section 953(b) required the SEC to promulgate a rule, which it eventually finalized and is currently known as Pay Ratio Disclosure. Historically, SEC rulemaking has received great deference when rules are judicially challenged. However, following the passage of Dodd-Frank, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has begun to grant less deference to SEC rulemaking where it has found that the SEC has …