Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Competition (2)
- Anti-competitive (1)
- Boot (1)
- Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc. (1)
- Corporate dissolution (1)
-
- Corporate injury (1)
- Corporate minority right (1)
- Deadlock (1)
- Errion v. Connell (1)
- Fanchon & Marco v. Paramount Pictures (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1)
- Federal antitrust law (1)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp. (1)
- Howard v. Commissioner (1)
- Internal Revenue Code (1)
- Investor protection (1)
- Kradon v. National Gypsum Co. (1)
- Liquidation (1)
- Minority shareholder (1)
- Private enforcement (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Reorganization (1)
- Rule X-10B-5 (1)
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1)
- Service of process (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Silver v. New York Stock Exchange (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Antiturst Law-Exemptions For Regulated Industries - Applicability Of The Antitrust Laws To Stock Exchanges, Peter D. Byrnes S.Ed.
Antiturst Law-Exemptions For Regulated Industries - Applicability Of The Antitrust Laws To Stock Exchanges, Peter D. Byrnes S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, the New York Stock Exchange, directed its members to discontinue their direct private wire connections with plaintiffs who were non-member brokers. These private wire connections were utilized primarily for facilitating transactions in the over-the-counter market. Repeated requests by plaintiffs for reinstatement were ignored, and the defendant refused to apprise the plaintiffs of the reasons for its action. Plaintiffs then brought suit, seeking damages and injunctive relief pursuant to sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act. Maintaining that defendant's conduct violated section 1 of the Sherman Act, plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. Held, motion granted.6 Defendant does not …
Taxation- Federal Income Tax-Status Of Stock-For-Stock Exchange Where Boot Is Involved, Roger B. Harris S. Ed
Taxation- Federal Income Tax-Status Of Stock-For-Stock Exchange Where Boot Is Involved, Roger B. Harris S. Ed
Michigan Law Review
Taxpayer was the sole stockholder of International Dairy Supply Company. In 1952, Foremost Dairies, Inc. acquired from taxpayer all his stock in Supply Company in exchange for 82,375 shares of Foremast's common stock and 3,000,000 dollars cash. Taxpayer reported as gain from the transaction only the 3,000,000 dollars "boot" received, less allowable expenses. The Commissioner determined a deficiency of 278,823 dollars, asserting that the nonrecognition provision of the 1939 Code counterpart of section 356 (a) (1) was inapplicable and therefore taxpayer's entire gain realized on the disposition must be recognized. The Tax Court upheld taxpayer's contention that by virtue of …
Regulation Of Business - Sec Rule X-10b-5 - Recovery By Corporation Fradulently Induced To Issue Shares, William S. Bach
Regulation Of Business - Sec Rule X-10b-5 - Recovery By Corporation Fradulently Induced To Issue Shares, William S. Bach
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, Mountain States Securities Corporation and former officers of Consolidated American Industries, Inc., organized a dummy corporation, the Mid-Atlantic Development Company. The defendants drew a formal contract whereby Mid-Atlantic agreed to transfer worthless Cuban insurance company stock and equally valueless Honduran oil exploration rights to Consolidated in exchange for 700,000 shares of Consolidated stock. Consolidated's former secretary falsely certified a corporate resolution authorizing the issuance of the stock, and its former general counsel advised Consolidated's stock transfer agent that the transaction was exempt from SEC regulation. Acting on these representations, the transfer agent issued the Consolidated stock. Since at this …
Federal Antitrust Law - Stockholders' Remedies For Corporate Injury Resulting From Antitrust Violations: Derivative Antitrust Suit And Fiduciary Duty Action, William Y. Webb S.Ed.
Federal Antitrust Law - Stockholders' Remedies For Corporate Injury Resulting From Antitrust Violations: Derivative Antitrust Suit And Fiduciary Duty Action, William Y. Webb S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The question of what remedies are available to a stockholder whose corporation has been injured or is threatened with injury by acts violative of the federal antitrust laws is largely unexplored. The staggering fines suffered by a number of corporations in the recent electrical industry criminal antitrust convictions demonstrate, however, that the question is both timely and important. Moreover, its answer could have a great impact both upon the means of protecting corporate minority rights and upon the means of private enforcement of the federal antitrust laws. The stockholders' derivative suit affords two remedies which deal with these two points …
Tingle: The Stockholder's Remedy Of Corporate Dissolution, Hugh L. Sowards
Tingle: The Stockholder's Remedy Of Corporate Dissolution, Hugh L. Sowards
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Stockholder's Remedy of Corporate Dissolution. By James O'Malley Tingle