Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Securities Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Michigan Law School

Michigan Law Review

Journal

Investment Company Act of 1940

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Securities Law

Insurance-Variable Annuities-Application Of Investment Company Act Of 1940, William C. Brashares May 1963

Insurance-Variable Annuities-Application Of Investment Company Act Of 1940, William C. Brashares

Michigan Law Review

Anticipating the sale of variable annuity contracts as a part of its regular business, Prudential, a life insurance company, applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission for complete exemption from the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Prudential claimed that it qualified for exemption as an insurance company under the definition of "insurance company" in the Investment Company Act ("a company ... whose primary and predominant business activity is the writing of insurance . . . and which is subject to supervision by the insurance commissioner or a similar official or agency of a state"). In the alternative, …


Securities Regulation- Federal Courts-Private Rights Of Action Under The Investment Company Act Of 1940, Lee D. Powar Mar 1962

Securities Regulation- Federal Courts-Private Rights Of Action Under The Investment Company Act Of 1940, Lee D. Powar

Michigan Law Review

Two actions for damages were brought against officers and directors of a mutual investment fund alleging violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940. These actions, by the fund itself and by a stockholder on behalf of the fund, were consolidated in a federal district court. The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss for want of federal jurisdiction. On an interlocutory appeal by the non-affiliated directors, held, reversed. The Investment Company Act of 1940 does not expressly or by implication create a private right of action cognizable in the federal courts against non-affiliated directors. Brouk v. Managed Funds, Inc. …


Regulation Of Business - Securities Act Of 1933 - Sec Loses Fight To Regulate Variable Annuity, William J. Wise S.Ed. Feb 1958

Regulation Of Business - Securities Act Of 1933 - Sec Loses Fight To Regulate Variable Annuity, William J. Wise S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The defendant, Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company, regulated as a life insurance company by the District of Columbia, issued a contract which it termed an annuity, but which differed from a conventional annuity in certain important respects. Ordinary annuity premiums are invested in debt securities while the premiums paid on the variable annuity are invested in common stocks. Further, instead of benefit payments in fixed dollar amounts, the variable annuity's benefits fluctuate since the value of the fund from which they are paid is affected by changing stock prices and dividend policies. The SEC, claiming these provisions brought the contract …