Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
-
- First Amendment (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Retirement Security Law (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Taxation-Federal (1)
- Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
- Taxation-Transnational (1)
- Torts (1)
- Transportation Law (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Limiting Leukophobia: Looking Beyond Lockup. Debunking The Strategy Of Turning White Collars Orange, Jared J. Hight
Limiting Leukophobia: Looking Beyond Lockup. Debunking The Strategy Of Turning White Collars Orange, Jared J. Hight
Jared J Hight
The legal and political landscape of the past 30 years has resulted in the abandonment of the utilitarian principle of parsimony as applied to white collar criminals. In response to preceding decades of minor punishments meted out for serious white collar crimes, the Federal Sentencing Commission abandoned the typical past practices of sentencing judges and instead formulated Guidelines that are wildly excessive and no longer balance the need for community safety with the need for that same community to remain economically efficient. The guiding principles of deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation have been deemphasized in a new model that focuses primarily …
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Mark Strasser
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. Non-religious practices do not receive those same protections, which makes the ability to distinguish between religious and non-religious practices important. Regrettably, members of the Court have been unable to agree about how to distinguish the religious from the non-religious—sometimes, the implicit criteria focus on the sincerity of the beliefs, sometimes the strength of the beliefs or the role that they play in an individual’s life, and sometimes the kind of beliefs. In short, the Court has virtually guaranteed an incoherent jurisprudence by sending contradictory signals with …