Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Internal Revenue Code (2)
- Bond (1)
- Boot (1)
- Capital gains rate (1)
- Corporate readjustment (1)
-
- Deduction (1)
- Depreciable property (1)
- Depreciation (1)
- Eisner v. Macomber (1)
- Gain (1)
- Japan (1)
- Loss (1)
- Recovery (1)
- Reorganization (1)
- Section 1239 (1)
- Section 354(a)(1) (1)
- Shareholder (1)
- Stock (1)
- Stock dividend (1)
- Stock ownership (1)
- Taxable income (1)
- Transaction (1)
- War loss (1)
- War-lost investment (1)
- World War II (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Stock Received In Lieu Of Salary By Stockholder-Employees Whose Proportionate Interest Remains Unchanged Is Taxable Income--Commissioner V. Fender Sales, Inc., Michigan Law Review
Stock Received In Lieu Of Salary By Stockholder-Employees Whose Proportionate Interest Remains Unchanged Is Taxable Income--Commissioner V. Fender Sales, Inc., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Transactions involving forgiveness by stockholder-employees of corporate indebtedness are shrouded in legal uncertainty. The conflicting positions espoused by the Commissioner, the Tax Court, and the circuit court in the principal case focus attention on a few salient problems. The Commissioner, in arguing that the receipt of stock by the individual taxpayers constituted taxable income, considered the individuals solely as employees, believing it immaterial that they were also stockholders. Thus, he reasoned that when they, as employees, received stock in payment of their accrued salaries, they realized income. In contrast, the Tax Court viewed the individual taxpayers as stockholders who had …
Retention Of Control Over Stock Constitutes "Ownership" Under Section 1239 Of The Internal Revenue Code-Harry Trotz, Michigan Law Review
Retention Of Control Over Stock Constitutes "Ownership" Under Section 1239 Of The Internal Revenue Code-Harry Trotz, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner set up a corporation, retaining seventy-nine per cent of the stock and -distributing the remainder to a third party. The third party borrowed from petitioner, pledging his stock as security and executing an option agreement under which the petitioner could recover the stock at any time. Subsequently, the newly organized corporation purchased all the depreciable assets of petitioner's proprietorship at a price in excess of their adjusted basis; petitioner reported the difference as a capital gain. The Commissioner declared a deficiency, relying on section 1239 of the Internal Revenue Code, which treats as ordinary income the gain recognized from …
The Solely-For-Voting-Stock Requirement In "B" Reorganizations Satisfied By Cash Payments For Fractional Shares-Mills V. Commissioner, Michigan Law Review
The Solely-For-Voting-Stock Requirement In "B" Reorganizations Satisfied By Cash Payments For Fractional Shares-Mills V. Commissioner, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The Internal Revenue Code requires recognition of gains or losses realized upon a sale or exchange of property. An exception to this general rule is found in section 354(a)(1), the basic nonrecognition provision for stock-for-stock reorganizations. This section provides that a stockholder need not recognize gains or losses "if stock or securities in a corporation a party to a reorganization are, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization, exchanged solely for stock or securities in such corporation or in another corporation a party to the reorganization." However, before section 354 can be reached, the exchange must satisfy one of the …
Recovery Of Accrued But Unpaid Interest On War-Lost Investments Taxed As Capital Gain To Extent It Exceeds Basis-Horst V. United States, Michigan Law Review
Recovery Of Accrued But Unpaid Interest On War-Lost Investments Taxed As Capital Gain To Extent It Exceeds Basis-Horst V. United States, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Prior to the United States entry into World War II, taxpayer acquired certain Japanese bonds. In December 1941, pursuant to section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, he suffered a war loss with respect to these investments and took the proper deduction. When trading restrictions on Japanese bonds were lifted in 1950, taxpayer enjoyed a war loss recovery. At that time, bonds of this type were being traded flat, the quoted price reflecting both principal and accrued but unpaid interest thereon to the date of recovery. As the defaulted interest coupons were paid on their extended maturity dates, …